Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The detail is unimportant, what matters now is that Pelosi has him boxed in.
He's got to get out of the box - she's got a structure around him now.
His typical play is to break the shackles by doing something more outrageous and distracting than whatever has him boxed in.
She's giving him rope with this, giving him all the rope in the world and betting he uses it to hang himself once and for all.
Whether it works is another matter, but he's not lawyerly enough in his approach to work his way through the gaps in the net like Clinton was in the late 90s.
And he's not got good people around him and even if he did he wouldn't listen to them
That said, he's a survivor, he's got a habit of getting out of jams.
But I strongly doubt Pelosi genuinely sees her win here him being impeached and it going all the way through the process and him being removed from office.
The bottom really fell out for you, didn't it? Reduced to counting backwards.
Wowee
You asked. I explained. Fusion GPS is not a foreign principal. The Ukrainian government, however, is a foreign principal. Which part stumps you?I'm still laughing at your cognitive dissonance re justifying the Steele Dossier.
"Well, they paid a third party to do the oppo research instead of doing it themselves, so it's all above board".
Lmao. Open both eyes man.
This is jarring to watch you guys with not a leg to stand on.
She just gave up the gavel with starting impeachment proceedings.
This might be the smoking gun but the general public that don't live politics don't give a s**t about this. They have been here too many times and have stopped listening.
There we are.She just gave up the gavel with starting impeachment proceedings.
This might be the smoking gun but the general public that don't live politics don't give a s**t about this. They have been here too many times and have stopped listening.
Even if it is a Smoking Gun the Republican Senate won't convict.
Pelosi wants her win elsewhere.
Stop pretending to know anything about this subject.She wont get it.
There we are.
The Trumpets decide that even if Trump broke the law, it doesn't matter. That is the only argument remaining available to them.
When confronted with reality, they end up with "nah I don't care so it doesn't count".
It took how many days?
Stop pretending to know anything this subject.
In what respect?Do you think Biden did wrong?
What does this have to do with the matter at hand?Do you think bleaching email is illegal?
Do you think lying to the FISA courts is illegal?
This is jarring to watch you guys with not a leg to stand on.
You still have to go through the motions of replying though.
I really couldn't ask for a more clear demonstration of the fact you have no argument.
He might well be re-elected. I've never said otherwise.You can bleat all you want but Trump with be President until 2024.
How will you cope?
In what respect?
What does this have to do with the matter at hand?
You need to address the central point here: the transcript shows Trump soliciting aid from a foreign government, asking them to investigate a political rival. That is illegal.
What is your argument against that statement?
It is not an argument to just ignore it and say "what about this other stuff?" You are avoiding the issue.
196I really couldn't ask for a more clear demonstration of the fact you have no argument.
You don't even trust yourself to string a sentence together.
What do you mean "where my moral equivalence is"? That makes no sense.How can I ignore it. You post it every 2nd post.
I just want to know where your moral equivalence is. You just made this obvious.
You prove my point for me.196
Time for bed so I will update the count of your insane posts tomorrow
He might well be re-elected. I've never said otherwise.
The big variable, as ever, is whether the Democrats shoot themselves in the foot.
Now, back to the issue at hand, the transcript shows Trump soliciting aid from a foreign government, asking them to investigate a political rival. That is illegal.
What is your argument against that statement? Do you have one?
It's OK to say you don't. Just concede the point. Be honest instead of endlessly misdirecting.
What do you mean "where my moral equivalence is"? That makes no sense.
Do you concede you have no argument on the matter at hand?
So make an argument or concede you don't have one.This is mind numbing.
No. They're the dumbest f***ers on this planet.