Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 9 - The Shi'ites Hit The Fan (Cont. in Part 10, see OP)

[blackcat]

MSM - "the president then in damning evidence says"

Trump - "yeah thats great and if your ever around we do a great pork roast and we would love to have you, we can crack a few beers"

MSM - "this is the line that proves unequivocally that Trump is colluding with Russia"

Chief Satan Balls In any close scrutiny of d'affaire trump can only be interpreted that his position on Russia (especially Ukraine) is tougher than Obama, this is all about the MSM and HRC Mook Podesta, the NYTimes, the WaPo, and Bezos, have conspired*
*amorphous, NOT conspiracy qua conspiracy,
...and Bezos have conspired to move all traditional 4th Estate media against POTUS and to get him in indicted. See: CNBC's Rachel Maddow qua Mad, qua Peter Sellers Kubrik's Dr Strangelove General Curtis Lemay... this has pushed Trump further to the extreme to prove his bonafides against traditional cold war foe.

Just read some Stephen F Cohen and Aaron Mate.

And in immortal words of Jan Ullrich, if you can't add two and two I can't help you.

yaco55

#fuxsake folx, get a grip, leave the TDS behind

GuruJane

 

[Groin guru]

On the contrary, I'm focused on the issue of Trump's conduct.

Your response is: "No, look over here!"

Who is your favourite Fox News host?

If you took the time to read instead of acting superior and dodging anything remotely challenging you would know that I spoke about the transcript and exactly what trump said. What the inspector general said. What the DOJ concluded. What the Ukranian president said. What Biden said. I'd say that covers every base.

I know like MSM. Why would I? MSNBC and CNN both cut and pasted the transcript to push an agenda. Then people like you get all worked up because you're too lazy to read a few pages and do some independent thought.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

So if the WH did indeed take action to "lockdown" the record of Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian president, what is going to be the self-serving Trumpet explanation for that?

It surely undermines the previous claim that whatever Trump said was utterly benign. Such action would in fact suggest the WH aides knew it was bad at the time and acted to conceal it.

 

[Groin guru]

I did enjoy this legal opinion from Chris Christie before the transcript was released.

Just highlights how little reading people do. The favour is related to Crowdstrike.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

I know like MSM. Why would I? MSNBC and CNN both cut and pasted the transcript to push an agenda.

You mean the account of the conversation released by the administration because they erroneously thought it made Trump look OK?

 

[blackcat]

As old mate Socrates said,
"True wisdom is knowing that you know nothing at all".

Let that one marinate for a bit... glad to help!

Sweet Jesus the low information line is a HRC smear, I see you majored in plagiarism at kindergarten, cheers to you brah

 

[Chief]

So for all of those that read the transcript where is the:

• quid pro quo?
• mention of withholding 391 million?
• the favour to look into Biden? - The favour from President Zelenskyy is looking into Crowdstrike - a security software company that the democrats had analyse the DNC servers after their emails were leaked - after claiming it was the Russians. But the DNC wouldn't give the servers to the FBI. Crowdstrike previously falsely claimed that the Russians hacked into a Ukranian system so Barr is trying to find out if they falsely hacked into the DNC servers.

"that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, and incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible." - AKA - look into how the entire witch hunt against me (Trump) started.

The funny thing is this all lead to what Pelosi feared before and why she was so apprehensive about proceeding with impeachment inquiries in the past. Trump campaign raised $5 million since the impeachment inquiry started. Galvanising the Republicans.

Bye-bye Biden, hello Warren. She was probably the Whistleblower . She'll pick Buttigeg as her VP to maximise her diversity pulling power.

So, you like this free website I provide for you don't you? I do a lot for you.

 

[Groin guru]

You mean the account of the conversation released by the administration because they erroneously thought it made Trump look OK?

What about the Inspector General and DOJ ticking it off 2 months ago? When the conversation (25th July) was flagged.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Sweet Jesus the low information line is a HRC smear, I see you majored in plagiarism at kindergarten, cheers to you brah

The phrase "low information" is trademarked by Clinton?

Sorry, I didn't realise.

Did she use it to describe Quora Knightley too?

 

[Sweet Jesus]

You mean the account of the conversation released by the administration because they erroneously thought it made Trump look OK?

What about the Inspector General and DOJ ticking it off 2 months ago? When the conversation (25th July) was flagged.

And you claim you're not deflecting.

A point get raised that doesn't suit your argument. And your immediate response is "what about..."

It's like clockwork. Do better.

 

[Groin guru]

So, you like this free website I provide for you don't you? I do a lot for you.

If I'm giving thanks I'd like some back in return. Without me and a few others in here this would be a low-quality echo-chamber.

I have nothing but respect for what you and your team have done with bigfooty over the years. I just wish you viewpoint on pretty much every issue wasn't off the reservation. At least you're a contributing nutjob. That's the difference between me buying you a shitty watered down beer vs. buying you a drink you enjoy.

 

[Chief]

What about the Inspector General and DOJ ticking it off 2 months ago? When the conversation (25th July) was flagged.

"Ticking it off" = ??

 

[Groin guru]

And you claim you're not deflecting.

A point get raised that doesn't suit your argument. And your immediate response is "what about..."

It's like clockwork. Do better.

How is that deflecting? They are the Department of Justice.

Again, bigfooty poster <<< The DOJ.

That's like you asking me a question about a food item and I refer you to the information set in the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. Then you say "stop deflecting"

 

[Chief]

If I'm giving thanks I'd like some back in return. Without me and a few others in here this would be a low-quality echo-chamber.

I have nothing but respect for what you and your team have done with bigfooty over the years. I just wish you viewpoint on pretty much every issue wasn't off the reservation. At least you're a contributing nutjob. That's the difference between me buying you a s**tty watered down beer vs. buying you a drink you enjoy.

Huh? Why do you think I want anything? I didn't specifically mention that, yet you respond as if I have asked for something. I am puzzled.

 

[Sweet Jesus]

How is that deflecting? They are the Department of Justice.

Again, bigfooty poster <<< The DOJ.

That's like you asking me a question about a food item and I refer you to the information set in the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. Then you say "stop deflecting"

If the call was so benign, why did the WH move to conceal the record of it?

As for the DOJ, it is overseen by someone implicated in Trump's alleged abuses of power.

 

[Groin guru]

"Ticking it off" = ??

This phone call was on July 25th. At this point, the inspector general referred this to the DOJ as a possible campaign financed violation (Trump using the government to advance his own campaign). The DOJ already looked into it and concluded - "all relevant components of the department agreed with this legal conclusion: that there was NO violation"

The Inspector General found that the "whistleblower" who leaked the information about the phone call had "some sign of an arguable political bias in favour of a rival political candidate"

So the "whistleblower" had a bias against Trump. So again we don't see collusion on the part of Trump but the intelligence community and the Democrats AGAIN (like they were doing in 2016). Which is why Trump asked about Crowdstrike because he wants to get to the bottom of the 2016 election issue.

 

[Groin guru]

Huh? Why do you think I want anything? I didn't specifically mention that, yet you respond as if I have asked for something. I am puzzled.

****ing so needy chief. You've done well okay. happy?

 

[Sweet Jesus]

This phone call was on July 25th. At this point, the inspector general referred this to the DOJ as a possible campaign financed violation (Trump using the government to advance his own campaign). The DOJ already looked into it and concluded - "all relevant components of the department agreed with this legal conclusion: that there was NO violation"

The Inspector General found that the "whistleblower" who leaked the information about the phone call had "some sign of an arguable political bias in favour of a rival political candidate"

So the "whistleblower" had a bias against Trump. So again we don't see collusion on the part of Trump but the intelligence community and the Democrats AGAIN (like they were doing in 2016). Which is why Trump asked about Crowdstrike because he wants to get to the bottom of the 2016 election issue.

The IG also found the complaint to be "urgent and credible". Why did you leave that out?

 

[Satan]

Too soon?

 

[Sweet Jesus]

How many agencies are engaged in the Trump arse-covering operation?

 

[blackcat]

If I'm giving thanks I'd like some back in return. Without me and a few others in here this would be a low-quality echo-chamber.

I have nothing but respect for what you and your team have done with bigfooty over the years. I just wish you viewpoint on pretty much every issue wasn't off the reservation. At least you're a contributing nutjob. That's the difference between me buying you a s**tty watered down beer vs. buying you a drink you enjoy.

but we have seen the zeitgeist so well represented by trudeau and Wang's Daniel Andrews, Arden or Ardern, et al, we should just leave it to the historians to do their work and judge these low altitude fliers in * in three decades

*PJKperfectplagiarism

 

[BigTacoBandit]

Just highlights how little reading people do. The favour is related to Crowdstrike.

Isnt that just as bad though? Trump is saying "do me a favor and investigate Crowdstrike or you wont get your Javelins" in an attempt to get dirt on political rivals.

 

[blackcat]

View attachment 754043

Too soon?

i mocked the HRC Podesta Mook RussiaGate scandal with such a meme 3 years back, completely original, and it used the damn stonefruit

either Deleuze or Baddou, a French philosopher and mathematician created the theory for memetics decades prior to TimBernersLee


sorry meds
medusala

 

[Chief]

******* so needy chief. You've done well okay. happy?

I just can't believe the same thing worked twice in one thread.

Do you understand "context" now? Can you draw a parallel with the Trump phone call?

 

[Sweet Jesus]

Support for impeachment increasing sharply.

I'm sceptical of such polls, but if you're a Republican in a purple state, you're keeping an eye on these numbers. Still likely to err on the side of cowardice, of course.