- Jun 17, 2007
- 3,842
- 5,010
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Inverleigh Hawks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Defending the tactical approach in Australia is that no funding gets to your area if not marginal. And tipping out politicians regularly prevents them getting pensions.I agree she’d likely not get much (she’s not particularly well known), but then Bernie wasn’t seen as anything of note when he first announced in 2015.
I don’t like the whole “be an amateur prognosticator” thing in terms of electability. I think you can only find who speaks to your concerns and hope they speak to others (and spread the word on their behalf). I remember during the 2020 primary Nate Silver or someone of his ilk commented that Amy Klobuchar was the most electable candidate and that her polling so badly showed that wasn’t a priority to Democratic primary voters. And I thought the dissonance in that was pretty astonishing, but is the issue with people treating politics as a science.
(I also remember living in the UK during the Corbyn elections and in 2019 a campaign to “vote tactical”, advocating for Lib Dem votes. And so there were seats where they went Tory and where Labour massively outpolled the Lib Dems, who people were told were the tactical anti-Conservative vote. Basically, I think a lot of the “think tactical, not ideological” view of politics is wrongheaded.)
Because voting on a single issue is almost always a mistake.
No realistic candidate is going to have a substantially different policy on Gaza, and no realistic candidate is going to have a materially different affect on the progress of the war.
So, if I have an interest in something else, such as, resisting the spread of fascist like policy in the US, I shouldn't support the candidate most likely to affect that outcome, because of his policies on Gaza.
If there was a candidate with a chance of winning, who could end the war, and roll back Trumpism, sure, has my support.
Because as I see it, the current options on the table are.
Stop Trump, but not stop the war and,
Not stop Trump, not stop the war.
Option 1 for me.
On moto g(6) plus using BigFooty.com mobile app
As we aren't Americans, its foreign policy is the one that's going to make the biggest difference for us. But irrespective, while things are beyond any single issue, I think the slaughter of 26,000 and the displacement of another 2 million is beyond a "single issue" (as Lyndon Johnson found, who had a significantly better domestic record than Biden but was losing the Democratic base because of the carnage in Vietnam).
The threat to withhold support is the only thing people have to have Biden back down in throwing his support behind Israel. The acceptance of the Democratic base of "Well it's not good but the Republicans would be worse!" have seen the Democrats chase right for decades and led to this current sorry state (could also look at the ALP, but the threat to not vote or to vote for a third party is a bit harder in mandatory, preferential voting).
Looks like The Daily Show reads BigFooty tooMy non politician option, and who I actually think is a good matchup for Trump, as I've said before, is Jon Stewart. Well known, sharp, funny, good in debate mode. Yeah, he's to the left of Biden, but Trump's true fans think Biden is socialist and aren't switching anyway. Independents put off by Trump, but equally perceptions about Biden's age and inaction, might be swayed. He'd pull more left-wing votes and he has admiration from veteran and first responder groups, given his advocacy for them. Word of mouth, endorsements etc can help there. He even has some begrudging respect from conservatives over that, which may not get their vote, but could influence independents if they hear that. Someone like Whitmer as a running mate, or flip it and have Stewart as VP with the above as his priorities e.g. veterans administration.
Plus anything to piss off Tucker Carlson.
Because voting on a single issue is almost always a mistake.
No realistic candidate is going to have a substantially different policy on Gaza, and no realistic candidate is going to have a materially different affect on the progress of the war.
So, if I have an interest in something else, such as, resisting the spread of fascist like policy in the US, I shouldn't support the candidate most likely to affect that outcome, because of his policies on Gaza.
If there was a candidate with a chance of winning, who could end the war, and roll back Trumpism, sure, has my support.
Because as I see it, the current options on the table are.
Stop Trump, but not stop the war and,
Not stop Trump, not stop the war.
Option 1 for me.
On moto g(6) plus using BigFooty.com mobile app
I can’t see the republicans making choices any differently that would reduce effective support for Israel. Maybe even increase by stopping support for Ukraine and giving that to Israel.As we aren't Americans, its foreign policy is the one that's going to make the biggest difference for us. But irrespective, while things are beyond any single issue, I think the slaughter of 26,000 and the displacement of another 2 million is beyond a "single issue" (as Lyndon Johnson found, who had a significantly better domestic record than Biden but was losing the Democratic base because of the carnage in Vietnam).
The threat to withhold support is the only thing people have to have Biden back down in throwing his support behind Israel. The acceptance of the Democratic base of "Well it's not good but the Republicans would be worse!" have seen the Democrats chase right for decades and led to this current sorry state (could also look at the ALP, but the threat to not vote or to vote for a third party is a bit harder in mandatory, preferential voting).
There's plenty of other options, 'generic democrat' still leads Trump in polling. Wouldn't want Mrs O in any case, political dynasties can GAGF.Michelle Obama to be the dem nomination for president?
Pretty much the only chance Trump doesn't win
I don't think reality and Joe can be used in the same sentence anymore.There's plenty of other options, 'generic democrat' still leads Trump in polling. Wouldn't want Mrs O in any case, political dynasties can GAGF.
Joe seems too stubborn to accept reality and move over for anyone though, think we're past the point of no return now.
Think it is just standard stubbornness bd hubris not senilityI don't think reality and Joe can be used in the same sentence anymore.
Senility has well and truly set in.
Perhaps that was because American boys were dying in Vietnam? No US troops in Gaza at the moment, are there?As we aren't Americans, its foreign policy is the one that's going to make the biggest difference for us. But irrespective, while things are beyond any single issue, I think the slaughter of 26,000 and the displacement of another 2 million is beyond a "single issue" (as Lyndon Johnson found, who had a significantly better domestic record than Biden but was losing the Democratic base because of the carnage in Vietnam).
The threat to withhold support is the only thing people have to have Biden back down in throwing his support behind Israel. The acceptance of the Democratic base of "Well it's not good but the Republicans would be worse!" have seen the Democrats chase right for decades and led to this current sorry state (could also look at the ALP, but the threat to not vote or to vote for a third party is a bit harder in mandatory, preferential voting).
Do you mean Biden, or Geelong_BisonsThink it is just standard stubbornness bd hubris not senility
Dark Brandon is out and about today.
Dark Brandon is out and about today.
Amazing. He completed 3 sentences.Not too senile there, hey Geelong_Bisons_#36?
It's hilarious how easy some of you fall for the Trumpie deflection about mental capacity. Says a lot about mental capacity, tbh.
More than his opponent can manage.Amazing. He completed 3 sentences.
Trump can complete 3 sentences.More than his opponent can manage.
Amazing. He completed 3 sentences.
Never forget that Trump was a 5 times draft dodger and none of his family have served in the US military
The Texas National Guard is what Texas are using in standoffs with federal border protection. They can be federalised (activated under federal control) at short notice, just like other states National Guard units. So other states could end up just sending more units for Biden to federalise.Just need someone under 60 years old with more than 3 brain cells left to run, and they'll win.
With what's happening at the border in Texas currently that civil war maybe a bit closer than any one ever thought. Potentially a stunt to help Trump get over the line but even still incredibly concerning. The fact other states are sending "troops" to help Texas against the national guard must have at least some alarm bells ringing.