Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: If you want Capitalism, you got it

When will Trump be finished?

  • Right now. Bloke's a dickhead.

    Votes: 41 41.8%
  • We'll let him run, we'll wipe him out after the election. Be way funnier that way!

    Votes: 14 14.3%
  • At some point, Trump will wipe out all options except for him. Send him to jail.

    Votes: 9 9.2%
  • Needs to be next president of the ICC.

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • Clean the swamp, Trump2025!

    Votes: 31 31.6%
  • It's not enough to just elect him, him ahead of anyone else!

    Votes: 2 2.0%

  • Total voters
    98

Remove this Banner Ad

Mod Notice
* Thread monitored actively. User who drag it down will be removed

Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and its counterpart 'Trumpanzee' or anything similar will no longer be allowed.

Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.

Just a reminder, even if it hasn't come up for a few pages and y'all should know this stuff by now:

This thread is not about Covid, lockdowns, or vaccines. It is about Donald Trump. While Trump was in office during the pandemic and his response to Covid is relevant, there are pertinent threads for you to post your opinions on those things in.

It might also do with reminding a few that when you post on the SRP, you are responsible for backing up/verifying your claims to fact. What this means is that you will be asked time to time to support your claims with evidence, to ensure that this forum is as free of misinfomation as we can make it.

Do not post conspiracy theories on this forum. We have an entire other forum for that.

Thanks all.

As always, please submit ideas for the thread title by tagging Gethelred! We're looking for something new to match the new thread!



< - Trump 19 is back there.
 
Last edited:
For someone complaining about literacy, you didn't read the article, did you?

Victoria outperformed all other states except the ACT. The results were due to a decline in the high performers not due to overall literacy. The decline is likely attributed to the period of lockdowns and remote learning impacting access to teachers. Victoria and ACT are the only states where boys aren't outperformed by girls.

So if anything, 'woke' Victoria is the best place (along with the ACT) for young boys to develop their literacy skills.


So the decline was due to the Victorian Government's COVID policy? Checks out.
 
Oh we have a typo NAZI in our midst.

You were deep in a rant about literacy. It was quite the amusing time for you to make such an error. I wouldn't normally pull someone up on minor mistakes, but if you're going to go on a rant about literacy, you'd want to get it pretty spot on.
 
So the decline was due to the Victorian Government's COVID policy? Checks out.

There was no decline in the number of kids who met the Australian standard of literacy. As I pointed out in the quote.

Did you want to continue to rant about literacy whilst continuing to fail to read and comprehend the very article you linked?

You said 'woke' Victoria was the reason for a decline in literacy, that's not what the article says. If anything Victoria (and the ACT) are the two best states for young boys to be educated in as they're likely to be more literate than boys in other states. Woke Victoria strikes again? Making those boys literate and all.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You said she wasn't qualified.

Being VP doesn't require votes. What about her resume suggests she's not qualified for the role?

As compared to say, J.D Vance?

You're right VP doesn't require votes. Harris was a great VP. Her is a list of her accomplishments:














Its a mystery how she lost the election with all of that behind her.
 
You were deep in a rant about literacy. It was quite the amusing time for you to make such an error. I wouldn't normally pull someone up on minor mistakes, but if you're going to go on a rant about literacy, you'd want to get it pretty spot on.

Three sentences counts as deep rant?
 
You're right VP doesn't require votes. Harris was a great VP. Her is a list of her accomplishments:














Its a mystery how she lost the election with all of that behind her.

You said she wasn't qualified.

I gave you her history prior to being VP, you've at no point commented on her qualifications.

You've mentioned her primary votes - not a requirement for VP.
You've ignored JD Vance as comparison given he's the incoming VP.
You've now tried to redirect to her accomplishments as VP instead of her qualifications prior to appointment.

You wouldn't be trying to avoid the question and/or shift the goalposts would you?
 
Three sentences counts as deep rant?

So no comment on the content of the article you linked in order to support the point you thought you were making, but that actually supported the opposite? 'Woke' Victoria being one of the two best states for young boys to be educated based on literacy outcomes.
 
There was no decline in the number of kids who met the Australian standard of literacy. As I pointed out in the quote.

Did you want to continue to rant about literacy whilst continuing to fail to read and comprehend the very article you linked?

You said 'woke' Victoria was the reason for a decline in literacy, that's not what the article says. If anything Victoria (and the ACT) are the two best states for young boys to be educated in as they're likely to be more literate than boys in other states. Woke Victoria strikes again? Making those boys literate and all.

One in 4 in Victoria do not meet the literacy standard, and Victoria spends more on education. Saying boys are worse elsewhere is really nothing to crow about.
 
You said she wasn't qualified.

I gave you her history prior to being VP, you've at no point commented on her qualifications.

Or wow, an ex-lawyer enters politics. That's unique. No-one ever did that before. Obvious choice really.

You've mentioned her primary votes - not a requirement for VP.

If you're not even liked by your own voters, how can you expect people vote for you running for President?

You've ignored JD Vance as comparison given he's the incoming VP.

He hasn't had one day as VP.


You've now tried to redirect to her accomplishments as VP instead of her qualifications prior to appointment.

You wouldn't be trying to avoid the question and/or shift the goalposts would you?

It was always the Democrats plan riding on a wave of BLM and Woke euphoria that Biden would step aside in the mid-terms to have the first woman of color as President. Except the old bastard did better than anyone thought he would, and ruined the succession plan.
 
Could you list up Mike Pence's accomplishments for comparison?
As vice president, Pence chaired the National Space Council following its reestablishment in 2017 as well as the White House Coronavirus Task Force, which was established in early 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Also does it bother you that the things the political left says the Republicans will do/have done like "stacking the Court"(they haven't) and blocking judicial appointments (they did), the Democrats have or wanted to well before then?
But they haven't in recent times. You are picking the worst possible example to try to turn this on the Dems.
 
As vice president, Pence chaired the National Space Council following its reestablishment in 2017 as well as the White House Coronavirus Task Force, which was established in early 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Partly correct regarding Pence,
Trump noticed the media coverage and promptly took over regarding the virus.
Just a fact.
 
Last edited:
But they haven't in recent times. You are picking the worst possible example to try to turn this on the Dems.

No that isn't the worst example.

The worst example is the Democrats support of slavery until a Republican President went to war over it and abolished it.

So lets see: The Democrats supported racism, had a President who actually did try to stack the Supreme Court and failed so he served as President for 12 rather than the standard 8 years during which time he appointed eight of the nine SCOTUS Judges (he wanted another 6), and also has repeatedly blocked Republican nominees.

But, but, but Trump....
 
Or wow, an ex-lawyer enters politics. That's unique. No-one ever did that before. Obvious choice really.

It’s a pretty common pathway, yes. So as politicians go, she’s qualified?

If you're not even liked by your own voters, how can you expect people vote for you running for President?

Again though, she’s VP. Not president. Voting isn’t a requirement for qualification.

He hasn't had one day as VP.

Irrelevant. He’s the incoming VP. His qualifications for the role are already known, what are they? How do they compare to the allegedly inadequate Harris?

It was always the Democrats plan riding on a wave of BLM and Woke euphoria that Biden would step aside in the mid-terms to have the first woman of color as President.

So this didn’t happen, you’ve made it up.

Also what exactly is ‘woke euphoria’?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: If you want Capitalism, you got it

Back
Top