I agree that the priority pick is the biggest incentive to tank overall, but I fail to see how the incentive to tank doesn't exist without the priority pick.
Again, what do you define as tanking?
Molly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I agree that the priority pick is the biggest incentive to tank overall, but I fail to see how the incentive to tank doesn't exist without the priority pick.
Again, what do you define as tanking?
Molly
Where any draft related incentive affects a team's priorities on winning a game.
So you are happy for a 12-10 team getting the first pick?
Molly
What if your team just ____ing sucks balls and you get pick 8, 3 years in a row even though you've won 3 spoons.
Let's start ANOTHER thread on lotteries and tanking. Just what the world needs.
The ONLY reason why a team might consider tanking is to receive a priority pick.
A priority pick = 1 more 17 year old gun.
But it doesn't really matter whether your team gets pick 1,2,3,4 or 5
No point losing games just so we can draft Bryce Gibbs instead Joel Selwood
Demetriou: please scrap the priority pick, so we can put an end to all this "tanking" horseshit
I hear so much about how a draft lottery similar to the NBA will stop tanking, yet if we take the NBA as the evidence it wont. Teams tank just as much and it is in fact openly excepted and expected that a team should tank.
The lottery ensures that tanking wont always pay off but it wont stop teams from doing it. Another system is needed if we are to stop the practice.
Huh? That makes very little sense.
If teams tank now in the AFL for one player, why would they not tank in a lottery. Coming last still means you have a greater chance than 9th of the number 1 pick. So if you are coming 10th you may as well aim for 16th and have more balls in the lottery.
Thats what they do in the NBA!
Have two words that should end any talk of lottery drafts for the AFL:
LA Clippers!
We done now?
Molly
Fair enough. But if you are weighting the draft, purely under the lottery (no need to look at compared to the old system as its gone anyway) system, you are still better off tanking (surgery, kids, etc,etc) as you have more balls and players that are ready for the next year and kids that have played games!
Molly
Again, what do you define as tanking?
Molly
you realise the odds of that are astronomically low, I'd be surprised to see it in a thousand years of footy. they are just as likely to finish ninth the following 3 yrs and get 3 number 1 picks! Yes you can get unlucky, but you are just as likely to get lucky, so over the years it evens out. Luck in sport is part what makes it enjoyable, fate always has a hand in your results why not in you draft spot?I hate the idea of a lottery. What if your team just ____ing sucks balls and you get pick 8, 3 years in a row even though you've won 3 spoons.
But its still no guarantee. You may finish 16th, but get pick 7 or something. The odds are in your favour, but no guarantee like it is now.
how can you say it's a problem when you don't know, or can't agree what it is?
thanks. you have just shown what is wrong with the simplistic and naive talk about tanking.
those things are not tanking. the state of a teams affairs are on a continuous plane, not a a discreet one off. you manage your team for the best long term and short term benefit. getting games into your kids, and not delaying surgery for stars once its clear that the season is over for you is GOOD MANAGEMENT.
flogging a dead horse is not good management. it's the way all sports have been for years, only now we have some illinformed kids screaming "tanking" all the time.
Some call that tanking, I personally don't. If you mean tanking is dropping games on purpose (not games lost through "GOOD MANAGEMENT") then there is already rules in place for that and its Match Fixing. It also isn't provable and doesn't happen!
If you are worried that it happens, kill the Priority Pick and it stops teams losing on purpose!
Molly
Thank you! You just made my point! Finally someone understands! Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Some people say it is what I would Call List Management (i.e. surgury, retiring guys early, playing kids) and some say it is losing games on purpose (but not because of the effects of list management).
You have to say what your trying to stop. If you agree with me tanking is losing on purpose (etc,etc), then I don't think it goes on at all and definitely not at this point in the season!
Molly