BoundbyKreuze
Cancelled
- Feb 9, 2020
- 1,463
- 2,997
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Merrett and Saad for pick 7 and Future first.Sorry, should've said Carlton supporters besides you, Skull face or BoundByKreuze..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Merrett and Saad for pick 7 and Future first.Sorry, should've said Carlton supporters besides you, Skull face or BoundByKreuze..
If you really want de Koning. It’ll require you to give up pick 6 and Saad.So 13 and DeKoning then?
FFS there’s FOUR trade offers there, and Carlton wont even listen to one of them??
What more can we do?
If the AFL was deciding what you get for Saad it would be pick 20-21 based on the contract.HAHAHAH this is some of the greatest bullshit I have read in this tip.
The AFL and AFLPA won't do sh*t about it. In fact the AFL would more likely scrutinise how Carlton have somehow pulled a swifty two years in a row and got highly rated players for free don't you think?
Perhaps the trend is that Carlton woo players offering them big money and long contracts and then don't want to pay the price to recruit them.
Different ways to polish a turd aren't there champ.
On draft night someone will want a player at pick 7. We can then downgrade on the night. Remember GC wouldn’t trade last years first for a downgrade with Martin but on draft night they did exactly that. GC have Carlton 17 and 22 for 11. Points massively in our favour. GC desperate for a player at that spot last year and similar will occur this year. If the equivalent happens this year. It’ll be 7 for 13 and 18. We pick a kid at 13 and Saad at 18. Essendon get **** all for being pricks.Stuff them. Let him nominate for the draft, use pick 7 on him and be done with it. We get our man. Essendon miss out on everything and their reputation is even further destroyed. Zero chance anyone uses a pick prior to that on him.
Just proves how ridiculous the requests are. Dodo has no power here, none.
Arguably it should be less as he’s uncontracted.If the AFL was deciding what you get for Saad it would be pick 20-21 based on the contract.
Pretty obvious who is asking for an unreasonable trade
You'd think Essendon would learn by now on mature negotiationsI honestly thought this was satire when I first saw it. Never change Dodo
Sets a bad precedent for future trades. What do you think the next club would ask for if we were after a gun mid? X3 first round picks?In the end who cares if we give up pick 7 for him.
I'd rather a quality known commodity than some unknown that won't contribute much for a couple of years anyway(if they even turn out any good anyway).
How much have Carlton put on the table for Saad?... does anyone know the exact figure?.. is it in the realm of $600-700k a season?.
If its around that then its a bit hard for Carlton to argue against paying up..
Those Carlton fans suggesting pick 7 should be split so they can get a pick in the teens to give up for Saad need to remember a pick in the teens in this years draft will probably end up being very late teens after compo/nga’s etc..
Pick 7 could drift out to 9-10..
Carlton have chased Saads services here.. now they are committed they need to pay up. Pick 7 sounds about right really..
I don't understand the question in relation to the comment you quoted?So why does the pre-season draft exist?
Spot on.You'd think Essendon would learn by now on mature negotiations
Just another piece of evidence on why they are miles off the good clubs
Lot of ifs and buts there.If he were a free agent the contract would result in band 2 or 3 compensation regardless of any anticipated bidding. Thats not even a first round pick.
Even if he were contracted a top 10 pick would be unjustifiable in a straight swap.
You should just go back to the Brad Crouch thread.
Lot of ifs and buts there.
“If he was a free agent”...
Hes not, so why bother bringing it up?
And on that, given you bought it up, if he was a free agent and Carlton was offering him around $600-700k a year... then they’d probably just chuck in another $50-100k to help ensure they get him for nothing (no draft pick cost through being forced into a trade) anyway..
And..
youre not a fan of people presenting arguements that dont suit your agenda are you.. this is the main board and I’ve got as much right to post my opinions here as anyone else.. so pull your head in..
neither do you but you keep trying to parade your opinion as fact.. which way is it??
You'd think Essendon would learn by now on mature negotiations
Just another piece of evidence on why they are miles off the good clubs
If the AFL thought Carlton were pulling swifties, they would step in and mediate, but they won't because they know Carlton will offer a fair trade.HAHAHAH this is some of the greatest bullshit I have read in this tip.
The AFL and AFLPA won't do sh*t about it. In fact the AFL would more likely scrutinise how Carlton have somehow pulled a swifty two years in a row and got highly rated players for free don't you think?
Perhaps the trend is that Carlton woo players offering them big money and long contracts and then don't want to pay the price to recruit them.
Different ways to polish a turd aren't there champ.