List Mgmt. AFC - 2014 Drafting and Trading

[Bailey01]

So Schoenmakers, Giles, McDonough and keep pick 10. Would that be a satisfying trade period for us?

 

[alex_is_on_fire]

Yea given the way they screwed GWS over with the O'Rourke trade I wouldn't be surprised to see Hawthorn get pick 10 out of this.

If that is the case, I hope he enjoys Perth.

 

[Red mist]

Let them bid. We can not get into a bidding war.

Hmmmmmmm ok

 

[alex_is_on_fire]

Hmmmmmmm ok

So you would give up pick 10 or 29 for him?

Yeah ok.

If he wants to play for us, they need to trade hiom for salary car relief - we really need to start being ruthless by screwing a few clubs over.

Pick 57 (or whatever number it is) thanks or no deal.

 

[spexau]

So Schoenmakers, Giles, McDonough and keep pick 10. Would that be a satisfying trade period for us?

Yes

 

[spenze]

So you would give up pick 10 or 29 for him?

Yeah ok.

If he wants to play for us, they need to trade hiom for salary car relief - we really need to start being ruthless by screwing a few clubs over.

Pick 57 (or whatever number it is) thanks or no deal.

Yep, get in his ear and get him to nominate us, hometown and would get a game

 

[NikkiNoo]

Probably 3-4 games....if that!

Don't consider what the Cronulla guys got in trying to figure out what Essendon players will. Cronulla didn't have a program in place for as long and as comprehensive as Essendon did. Unless the players totally hang the coaches and other staff out to dry I think the penalties will be a lot longer than a couple of games.

 

[Red mist]

So you would give up pick 10 or 29 for him?

Yeah ok.

If he wants to play for us, they need to trade hiom for salary car relief - we really need to start being ruthless by screwing a few clubs over.

Pick 57 (or whatever number it is) thanks or no deal.

Perhaps I confused you. I agreed.

 

[I Lost My Keays]

Don't consider what the Cronulla guys got in trying to figure out what Essendon players will. Cronulla didn't have a program in place for as long and as comprehensive as Essendon did. Unless the players totally hang the coaches and other staff out to dry I think the penalties will be a lot longer than a couple of games.

explains why they recruited gwilt

 

[Elite Crow]

So still no Cameron? Why is it taking so long?

 

[Crouch#44]

So Schoenmakers, Giles, McDonough and keep pick 10. Would that be a satisfying trade period for us?

No

 

[alex_is_on_fire]

So still no Cameron? Why is it taking so long?

He is shopping at Habour Town. Fair go.

 

[phill1795]

So still no Cameron? Why is it taking so long?

Hahaha all I know is he's preparing for the preseason with the gws lads so I very highly doubt it

 

[Bicks]

So still no Cameron? Why is it taking so long?

 

[I Lost My Keays]

So Schoenmakers, Giles, McDonough and keep pick 10. Would that be a satisfying trade period for us?

Schoenmakers (Fills a need for KPD)
Giles (Fills a need for Ruckman)
McDonough (doesn't cost us much at all)
Pick 10 (To keep our first rounder is a huge plus)

So yes i'll be very happy.

 

[phill1795]

No

I agree why would we need McDonough for the only ones k would give a shot are Giles and schoenmakers

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Would love Leunberger but at what cost and where will he play?

Isn't he a ruck only type player? not a natural forward.

Yeah, luey struggles as a forward. Jacobs would be better as a forward & we want him playing 70+% in ruck. Would cost to much & not really what we need.

Giles or Griffin more comfortable playing forward.

 

[Bailey01]

No

Why not

 

[Shamus75]

I reckon this is fair.

Trade 1 with Richmond

Out: 31, 50
In: 33, McDonough

Trade 2 with GWS

Out: 33
In: Giles, 40

Trade 3 with St Kilda

Out: Lyons, 40
In: 22

Overall Outs: 31, 50, Lyons
Overall Ins: 22, McDonough, Giles

Exchange Lyons in the St Kilda trade and would be happy. Lyons either goes to Carlton or stays with AFC.

 

[Crouch#44]

Why not

Not enough additions in the defensive department,

Also i feel we will need to find a tall forward that can pinch hit in the ruck even if they are under developed

 

[Bailey01]

Not enough additions in the defensive department,

Also i feel we will need to find a tall forward that can pinch hit in the ruck even if they are under developed

Not too many defensive options up for trade tbh.

 

[mickfaxis]

Schoenmakers (Fills a need for KPD)
Giles (Fills a need for Ruckman)
McDonough (doesn't cost us much at all)
Pick 10 (To keep our first rounder is a huge plus)

So yes i'll be very happy.

Do we keep Lyons then?

 

[I Lost My Keays]

Do we keep Lyons then?

Probably yes..........

If we don't get McDonough then Giles would most likely cost us our 3rd , Schoenmakers our second.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Suggestion in a main board rumour thread Hannath and 13 for 10.

Came from a Perth paper who must have a journo as credible as Rooch!

 

[spexau]

Not enough additions in the defensive department,

Also i feel we will need to find a tall forward that can pinch hit in the ruck even if they are under developed

If we managed those trades and filled those needs in the draft would you then be happy?