Shepherding i'd guess. Arguable if the ball was within the 5 or 10 metres of the contest it needs to be to outbody someone.a free how? I can't watch that again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Shepherding i'd guess. Arguable if the ball was within the 5 or 10 metres of the contest it needs to be to outbody someone.a free how? I can't watch that again.
I'd assume shepherding.a free how? I can't watch that again.
a free how? I can't watch that again.
After last weeks crap "ambush interview" with LB on Footy Crapafied, I dont know why people event watch, read or listen to anything that "goggles" Barrett has to say about our club.http://www.afl.com.au/video/2016-04-11/magpies-are-in-big-trouble
I'm pissed off.
2 things, of the Dogs v Hawks game, coming out of the 'Access All Areas' mini-show by Damien Barrett and Matthew Lloyd that need to be highlighted:
1. WHY THE F**K WAS MATTHEW LLOYD ACTUALLY SMILING WHEN DISCUSSING BOB'S INJURY?? Pause at 1:38min mark to see.
2. How can someone so 'respected' as a journalist (Barrett), within the AFL circle, be so reactive as to say that Jake Stringer may be a liability to our team, and that others perform better when he's on the bench. This, coming after his round 1 'Sliding Doors' piece where he named Stringer his fourth favourite player in the entire competition. I mean, come on, I reckon Ben Stratton played one of the best games he's had in years against Stringer, fair play to him.
Not too often you dominate the coaches votes in a loss (20-10). Shows we had the game just didn't finish...Coaches votes
View attachment 234497
Current tally for Dogs players:
14- JJ
11- Dahl
11- Adams
9- Libba
8- Hunter
7- Biggs
7- Stringer
6- Bob
5- Daniel
1- Picken
1- Macrae
You blokes are top 4 material and will win a flag by 2018 IMO.
How do you get minus in metres gained? I noticed in the Hun that one player of ours had -14 metres gained?!
Shepherd / hold. Would have been a contentious decision but there argument can be made.I'd assume shepherding.
Hope you are right but still a lot of work to be done. Remember AFL were planning to start the GWS, GCS domination from next year. Don't think anyone will be winning 3 in a row for a whileYou blokes are top 4 material and will win a flag by 2018 IMO.
Don't want to turn this into an umpiring bash cause we lost the game ourselves , but I think it was Breust had no eyes for the ball grabbed and sheparded Murphy away from the contest.
The more i think about it, the more the narrative of this game is similar to the Freo game last year. Against a team expected to be competing at the end of the year, go down 5 goals to zip early on before we start to get back in the game. Final quarter a see-sawing battle but eventually go down in the final two mins of the game.
This year when we played Fremantle, we completely outplayed them. What happens next time we play the Hawks remains to be seen but geez, we'd have to be confident.
Don't want to turn this into an umpiring bash cause we lost the game ourselves , but I think it was Breust had no eyes for the ball grabbed and sheparded Murphy away from the contest.
The more i think about it, the more the narrative of this game is similar to the Freo game last year. Against a team expected to be competing at the end of the year, go down 5 goals to zip early on before we start to get back in the game. Final quarter a see-sawing battle but eventually go down in the final two mins of the game.
This year when we played Fremantle, we completely outplayed them. What happens next time we play the Hawks remains to be seen but geez, we'd have to be confident.
There were many, many questionable decisions throughout the game and I think we did a little better out of them than you, but that one wasn't one of them.
Yea. It would be hard.I hear you. I am so restless. I am meant to be working, but I am just sitting here listlessly refreshing bigfooty.
It's so empty. Imagine what the boys must be feeling.
I think we really missed Wood as he has the speed to cover a lot of ground fast and make a contest of the high mark.Agreed. But we also had some stars like Dixon and Wood out.
It was a shattering game at the end of the day, but we should all be proud that we came within 3 points (I take it as both teams won) of winning, to a tough and brutal side. It's not like Hawthorn played shit which is why we got close to them.
You won't get too many matches were your so close to winning against the Hawks when they are playing in their top form.
It would of been good to have Wood in the defence, as he would of given the others confidence to go forward. Players were too nervous in the 1st qtr, and thats what helped Hawthorn at the end of the day
I agree, I said before the game if we didn't beat the Hawks by four goals and get into their heads, then a close loss is the next best thing, to keep the boys hungry.A positive look for the Bulldogs would be to compare it to Hawthorn's late season game against Geelong in 2008. Geelong pipped us but it was close enough that Hawthorn had genuine belief that they could match the juggernaut. Had Geelong lost that game, they would not of been nearly as complacent (and arrogant) going into the grand final.
In the grand scheme of things, losing the tight one is not a bad result for a young team with genuine premiership aspirations this year.