Werewolf Basic Werewolf - Time for Chilli - VILLAGE WINS

Do you like Choc Mint Ice-Cream

  • No, I don't have working tastebuds.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

MWPP for me please. Can’t see any non-nefarious reason for that late switch

boncer34 hotchilli


We’re good at this game.

MWPP thanks hotch
Are your votes based on my vote switch?

As before, it was more about saving Harps and trying to get Jack lynched
(based on a combination of this play, and also that tidbit from a previous game that MC Bad Genius kindly confirmed re: greenery )
Than anything to do with sante

Honestly I was hoping somebody would seer me as Dingster suggested
Would rather it have been a flog than the actual seer though...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Do I look like a mod? What in the dog-shittery is this?
Haha
As known good, all I could assume was that they were after your approval
Tbh I think you're onto something re: Tarks but based on yesterday's play, he couldn't be mafia, so looking elsewhere
 
Haha
As known good, all I could assume was that they were after your approval
Tbh I think you're onto something re: Tarks but based on yesterday's play, he couldn't be mafia, so looking elsewhere
Lmao of course you do.

Any switch on deadline is dodgy. The case is even more compelling when you wind up rescuing another evil player at the expense of the doctor. Your argument of trying to save for Harps (and based on what behaviour?) is flimsy at absolute best. If I were trying to save someone I’d be proactive in their defence, not throwing a random last second vote on Jack.

Speaking of, why aren’t you interrogating Jack? You’re usually like a dog with a bone.

None of any of this is very like you at all.
 
Lmao of course you do.

Any switch on deadline is dodgy. The case is even more compelling when you wind up rescuing another evil player at the expense of the doctor. Your argument of trying to save for Harps (and based on what behaviour?) is flimsy at absolute best. If I were trying to save someone I’d be proactive in their defence, not throwing a random last second vote on Jack.

Speaking of, why aren’t you interrogating Jack? You’re usually like a dog with a bone.

None of any of this is very like you at all.
I did not rescue another evil player at the expense of the doctor at all
I switched from Ding (my early vote) to sante (late) and then Jack (who was always going to be my final target, in case the jokey nature of my previous posts didn't give away that I wasn't serious with either of them)

Also, the premise behind my vote for Jack was that he was the SK who missed on Greenery, and also the target of the N1 miss
The latter seems less likely now based on that Harps result which is why I didn't open with that, and instead looked at the Harps voters
In any case, he was canny enough to get on the front foot so any interrogation now is going to look extra suspicious, isn't it?
 
I am going to vote MWPP because I can’t see a reason to change your vote at such a late stage unless you are evil. hotchilli boncer34
 
I did not rescue another evil player at the expense of the doctor at all
I switched from Ding (my early vote) to sante (late) and then Jack (who was always going to be my final target, in case the jokey nature of my previous posts didn't give away that I wasn't serious with either of them)

Also, the premise behind my vote for Jack was that he was the SK who missed on Greenery, and also the target of the N1 miss
The latter seems less likely now based on that Harps result which is why I didn't open with that, and instead looked at the Harps voters
In any case, he was canny enough to get on the front foot so any interrogation now is going to look extra suspicious, isn't it?
Wouldn’t sante have died rather than Harps had you not changed? That’s saving evil no matter how you try to spin it.
 
Wouldn’t sante have died rather than Harps had you not changed? That’s saving evil no matter how you try to spin it.
Only if you assume sante wouldn't have changed his vote, which I'm not naive enough to believe
 
Are your votes based on my vote switch?

As before, it was more about saving Harps and trying to get Jack lynched
(based on a combination of this play, and also that tidbit from a previous game that MC Bad Genius kindly confirmed re: greenery )
Than anything to do with sante

Honestly I was hoping somebody would seer me as Dingster suggested
Would rather it have been a flog than the actual seer though...
It’s very easy to phrase it that way. Could also be that you knew what HARPS was, conveniently switched to another player thinking they’d get lynched (but knowing the vote count). All in all was just a shifty move followed up by the “I tried to save the doctor” when realistically your vote change got the doctor lynched.

If something more concrete pops up then sure, but it’s all very convenient and you can frame it from both sides of the argument. If you knew HARPS was the doctor (as a good role) you would surely give everyone a reason to change.
 
Thanks to your actions we’ll never know
And even then, sante only had you/3KZ/sante on him, other than me
Which is equal to Harps (and jack) , even including sante's vote
I felt sante would remove the vote to save himself from the tie and sink Harps
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Werewolf Basic Werewolf - Time for Chilli - VILLAGE WINS

Back
Top