Frederico_WA
West Africa's #1 qooty player
Also interested to knowLigma, what is your current position on choc mint icecream?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also interested to knowLigma, what is your current position on choc mint icecream?
i agree.
For me???
Icecream?Lots of early action.
Instead of the usual costumeFor me???
I was too busy to care that much.i agree.
sorry about yesterday- I hope you understand
Are your votes based on my vote switch?
Tarkyn_24 please. I've heard he doesn't like choc mint icecream.
Thanks hotchilli, boncer34, thewizardmelon
HahaDo I look like a mod? What in the dog-shittery is this?
Lmao of course you do.Haha
As known good, all I could assume was that they were after your approval
Tbh I think you're onto something re: Tarks but based on yesterday's play, he couldn't be mafia, so looking elsewhere
I did not rescue another evil player at the expense of the doctor at allLmao of course you do.
Any switch on deadline is dodgy. The case is even more compelling when you wind up rescuing another evil player at the expense of the doctor. Your argument of trying to save for Harps (and based on what behaviour?) is flimsy at absolute best. If I were trying to save someone I’d be proactive in their defence, not throwing a random last second vote on Jack.
Speaking of, why aren’t you interrogating Jack? You’re usually like a dog with a bone.
None of any of this is very like you at all.
Wouldn’t sante have died rather than Harps had you not changed? That’s saving evil no matter how you try to spin it.I did not rescue another evil player at the expense of the doctor at all
I switched from Ding (my early vote) to sante (late) and then Jack (who was always going to be my final target, in case the jokey nature of my previous posts didn't give away that I wasn't serious with either of them)
Also, the premise behind my vote for Jack was that he was the SK who missed on Greenery, and also the target of the N1 miss
The latter seems less likely now based on that Harps result which is why I didn't open with that, and instead looked at the Harps voters
In any case, he was canny enough to get on the front foot so any interrogation now is going to look extra suspicious, isn't it?
But im on the Tarks mint choc icecream bandwagon
Only if you assume sante wouldn't have changed his vote, which I'm not naive enough to believeWouldn’t sante have died rather than Harps had you not changed? That’s saving evil no matter how you try to spin it.
Thanks to your actions we’ll never knowOnly if you assume sante wouldn't have changed his vote, which I'm not naive enough to believe
It’s very easy to phrase it that way. Could also be that you knew what HARPS was, conveniently switched to another player thinking they’d get lynched (but knowing the vote count). All in all was just a shifty move followed up by the “I tried to save the doctor” when realistically your vote change got the doctor lynched.Are your votes based on my vote switch?
As before, it was more about saving Harps and trying to get Jack lynched
(based on a combination of this play, and also that tidbit from a previous game that MC Bad Genius kindly confirmed re: greenery )
Than anything to do with sante
Honestly I was hoping somebody would seer me as Dingster suggested
Would rather it have been a flog than the actual seer though...
And even then, sante only had you/3KZ/sante on him, other than meThanks to your actions we’ll never know