- May 28, 2013
- 25,652
- 27,723
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Seattle Seahawks
Right so clubs don’t offer big money on potential but when they do it doesn’t count?Lol of course find the one outlier which still isn’t relevant to the McKay discussion. They paid that because he was expected to be a generational forward and the pick 1 from 12 months ago. Not an injury prone 25 year old who’s been in the system 6/7 years and still hasn’t broken out as a top line player due to a mixture of form and injury.
Look how that played out for them though. So actually doesn’t support your argument at all and if anything, is even more reason why clubs shouldn’t and likely won’t be paying $800k+ contracts based on just potential.
Who else has been offered that kind of contract purely on potential as you are asking for…
It happened last year - jase had an average 1st year yet got a massive contract - based on potential.
Or a does this 2nd example not count because it proves your post incorrect?