YepWe're a lot better than Brisbane.
That was on paper the easiest of the 3 games.
I'd take halving the next two games.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YepWe're a lot better than Brisbane.
Send out Hobson. Swap him and Eski in the order.Reckon if we had Mitch and Jhye, we would be close to being unstoppable.
What are we going to do about finding an opener?
Just promote hardy . Pretty much opening atm batting 3 and losing early wickets .Reckon if we had Mitch and Jhye, we would be close to being unstoppable.
What are we going to do about finding an opener?
GreenReckon if we had Mitch and Jhye, we would be close to being unstoppable.
What are we going to do about finding an opener?
Green's not available.Green
Hardie has just settled into 3.Just promote hardy . Pretty much opening atm batting 3 and losing early wickets .
Next year with Mitch Back will be interesting. He might have to open with Mitch first down. Inglis by my recollection did struggle at 5 for a bitHardie has just settled into 3.
Dont want to move him.
Still a big difference between batting 3 and opening.
I'd rather open with Inglis as he's done it before TBH.Next year with Mitch Back will be interesting. He might have to open with Mitch first down. Inglis by my recollection did struggle at 5 for a bit
Weird hey.I've just realised we're playing Brisbane for the second time in 4 days.
Why on earth?
I'm not sure if anyone else was watching the free to air broadcast on 7mate (FTA is having a bit of a renaissance at my place atm), but I'm almost certain I saw them put up a graphic saying "Scorchers win by 8 wickets with 22 balls left" or similar shortly after Hardie hit the winning runs.The “won by x wickets” thing doesn’t really work in short form cricket.
It really should be x won by four overs. It would make far more sense
Look, let's just all pile on Mop. Guy deserves it for being old and bustedI'm not sure if anyone else was watching the free to air broadcast on 7mate (FTA is having a bit of a renaissance at my place atm), but I'm almost certain I saw them put up a graphic saying "Scorchers win by 8 wickets with 22 balls left" or similar shortly after Hardie hit the winning runs.
Stuck out to me as I hadn't noticed it before (been watching most games on Kayo).
I don't mind these back to back games. Something different, potential for a quick revenge bout if you get a good matchup."double header" (if you will)
Man it would have been nice if Eski could batI'd rather open with Inglis as he's done it before TBH.
Colin Munro was out for less than 10 in three of his first four innings for us.Man it would have been nice if Eski could bat
Colin Munro also had an excellent body of work as an international.Colin Munro was out for less than 10 in three of his first four innings for us.
He did, and I conveniently omitted that the other of the first four innings he scored 114.Colin Munro also had an excellent body of work as an international.
I think he's just getting used to the tournament when a lot of the other players are already comfortable. Based on form elsewhere, he's a far better pick than Lyth.Not putting a line through him just yet, but he looked out of his depth last night to me.
We'll have to wait and see.He did, and I conveniently omitted that the other of the first four innings he scored 114.
I think he's just getting used to the tournament when a lot of the other players are already comfortable. Based on form elsewhere, he's a far better pick than Lyth.
Does the cricket thread come up now for youI have a random question that I think belongs in this thread. "the cricket thread" doesn't show up for me on the main West Coast board anymore, making me think I might have accidentally hid it or something. Does anyone know how to undo this?