-
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
BIG Q on the move?
- Thread starter worsfold
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Would Essendon be interested? They have no key forwards beside Gumby who looks good but is injury prone and Neagle & Hardingham who are questionable at best. Neagle missed a lot of footy to.
Nahas no good. I wouldn't be laughing. Probably a bigger and smaller spud than Damian Adkins.
Yes, I agree. I'd be crying not laughing, bad deal, robbed.
Nonsense.
Cupar Kane
Rookie
- Jul 13, 2010
- 34
- 0
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Lynch - an AFL premiership player.....
Nahas - a VFL player,proven nothing and not getting a game in front of some bloke called Webberley.
Get a clue!!!
Nahas - a VFL player,proven nothing and not getting a game in front of some bloke called Webberley.
Get a clue!!!
Lynch is a far better shot on goal than Neagle.
And can play other positions, ruck / CHF / ruck rover, which Neagle can't.
Neagle would have to be the worst FF in the comp by far.
Lynch for Reimers?
Lynch + our 3rd for their 2nd pick?
TurleyBurley
Team Captain
Lynch: an absolute truckosaurus whose good days are so far behind him they're almost impossible to see now, and who only gets a game because of how crap our team is. A known, useless quantity
Nahas: a guy who might, one way or another, have a future. An unknown quantity.
Hey! I resent that!
I think people might be underestimating Lynch's worth at the trade table. After all, Seaby wasn't exactly setting the world on fire and we still got a worthwhile pick for him. A team that needs a versatile big-body or even just a semi-decent CHF would be willing to give us something interesting for him. Personally I feel that that team is more the Gold Coast but that may be because they have all the picks and players I'm interested in. CHF is a tough position to play and Lynch could do it and pinch-hit in the ruck to allow any of their young KPFs time to find their feet and size.
Hey! I resent that!
I think people might be underestimating Lynch's worth at the trade table. After all, Seaby wasn't exactly setting the world on fire and we still got a worthwhile pick for him. A team that needs a versatile big-body or even just a semi-decent CHF would be willing to give us something interesting for him. Personally I feel that that team is more the Gold Coast but that may be because they have all the picks and players I'm interested in. CHF is a tough position to play and Lynch could do it and pinch-hit in the ruck to allow any of their young KPFs time to find their feet and size.
Take into consideration of the poor midfield kicking to him Lynch still works pretty hard.
I'm hoping Gold Coast, just told my 8yr old daughter he might be going and she said she's changing teams.
- Banned
- #62
That's what I think. As shit as Lynch has been this year, he's still superior to Naharse. Posters are thinking of Naharse in 2009, where he went o.k, not the Nahas that has been an absolute spud, in 2010.
WC will be getting ripped in a deal trading Lynch for Nahas. Bigs are worth a lot more than FP's. FP's have the least worth of any type of player.
- Banned
- #63
Lynch is a far better shot on goal than Neagle.
And can play other positions, ruck / CHF / ruck rover, which Neagle can't.
Neagle would have to be the worst FF in the comp by far.
Lynch for Reimers?
Lynch + our 3rd for their 2nd pick?
I'd also perhaps trade McKinley for Arse-reimers. Better still, a goodly pick upgrade would be nice.
Eagle Ant
Club Legend
He is....Its already agreed by both parties it just the finer points that need to be worked out.
Agreed, Nahas is ok but not what we need imo.
He has to be, he's a forward and all the best forwards a selfish and hungry around goals.
What i think you mean is he isn't a team player and trys to be a superstar when he isn't 1.
Ahhhhh No it wouldn't we would be getting screwed again.
We are looking for an established small forward, Not a fringe player.
IMO Established means players like- S.Milne, L.Davis, A.Schnider, S.Burns, P.Chapman, B.Dick, Brett Ebert, Jeff Garlett etc etc etc.
Im not saying we are chasing any of these guys but I doubt that players like Nahas, Krackour and Co would be classed as established and would they bring anything different to the team that Guys like Hams, Neates, Weedon, Broome, LeCras, Strijk couldnt. NO.
I think our small forward stocks are pretty good and next year if Neates, LeCras, Weedon and Hams all play together in our forward half with Kennedy and either Wilson or Darling we will have a dangerous Tall and Small division.
I do however believe a Ruckman with our PP or a trade is a must, as Will Sullivan still isnt ready to be a back up ruck if either Cox or Naita go down.
I would like to take a chance on Max Bailey from Hawthorn.
Max Bailey- 23yrs, 206cm, 107kgs, 6 games, Drafted from West perth.
Bio- The young ruckman will likely miss the entire 2010 season after undergoing his third knee reconstruction in four years. His career looked over when he damaged his ‘good’ left knee against Essendon in the final round, but he remains upbeat about adding to his tally of six AFL games. Showed he can compete at the level in an impressive comeback match against Richmond the previous week – his first AFL game in three years – when he had nine disposals, 23 hit-outs and six tackles.
Draft history: 2005 NAB AFL Draft 1st round selection (Hawthorn) No. 18 overall.
I believe a straight swap for 1 of our defenders like Matt Spangher would get the deal done.
Talent identification mate. Clearly you aren't able to do this.
not big on nahas. he's too fringe. we needa chase someone who can actually be expected to be in the best 18 or atleast 22. like a bennell or garlett. not nescecerily these two but hopefully someone with similiar ability.
- Thread starter
- #68
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/-/eagles/7773952/big-q-wants-to-make-amends/
May not be going anywhere, Worsfold see him as part of the forward line next year - don't shout!
May not be going anywhere, Worsfold see him as part of the forward line next year - don't shout!
Of course Worsfold does
**** **** ****.
Miguel Sanchez
(Unique injury) TBC
Well ... actually it says that "it is understood" that Worsfold sees him as part of the forwardline next year.
Must be one of the most overused, ambiguous phrases in footy journalism. Who understands it? What is the basis of their understanding?
Could mean something concrete, or nothing at all.
Oh god I hope this is a bluff to up his trade value by pretending we aren't desperate to get rid of him.
- Oct 8, 2007
- 13,797
- 9,504
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- FLO-RIDA , PITBULL ,SEAN PAUL
lets go back to the future....
Indeed. The phrase "it is understood" is used when they can't actually get a quote.
Why can't they get a quote? Because no one actually said it.
I love it when people get carried away.
Similar threads
