Lets hope that Essendope have to give up the farm now.
I hope 2 firsts (2018 & 2019) similar to Gibbs and Lever deals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Lets hope that Essendope have to give up the farm now.
It's just a bit of discussion but look at it like this
We trade a future first round (3-6 2019) then get
Setterfield
Maybe Pick 14 for Martin and a later pick
Pick 25 could still draft a good young player or could be traded for a Tyson type and a pick
We would essentially get 3 ready to go players that are best 22 and maybe two more picks.
You really don't like anyone disagreeing with you, do you?Cool, thanks for posting.
So the deal smacks of desperation? Then you agree with my original point.
I've previously nominated numerous ways in which we could have navigated this if we weren't wedded to the idea of MM, but BB wanted him badly.
Your logic of what is ‘overs’ is what is flawed. The potential damage from trading pick 1 is losing a champion. The probability of that is ‘reasonable’. The probability of losing access directly (through draft) or indirectly (through trade) of paying overs using second rounders is extremely low.I keep saying it, what frustrates me the most about the McGovern trade is that we paid overs for him (a forward we don’t really need) when we were determined that we wouldn’t pay overs for Shiel (a mature midfielder who we acknowledged we need this trade period)
How does that freaking make sense?
By the way I posted this in 2016
Would love Dylan Shiel, but I feel he'll be another Goddard, as a former Carlton supporter we'll always talk about him, but I feel he's the pure mercenary type and will go to some flog team like Richmond, Essendon or Collingwood, if he leaves GWS at all.
Jun 28, 2016
I should have listened to myself and not gotten my Hopes up
I hear you and I have consistently posted that our midfield needs our most attention. In fact its critical that we bolster it up ASAP.Hard Facts? We urgently require ready made midfielders. Why are we targeting MM when clearly thats not our most pressing need. It wouldn't matter if we have Lynch, Brown & Kennedy in our forward 50 with the limited supply our midfield provides. Absolutely livid with this trade. We wont win more than 5 games next year based on what we've bought in and yet were trading future picks and ready made players the AFL have provided us.
Haha Barlow was a A-grade mid when he was at his best, graham is a useful as an a-hole on your elbow and that’s being generous. You’re strait up dangus if you don’t think he will help, he has a bigger body than all the youngins, him Cripps and Kennedy dishing out to them wile they develop for another year.
Any insight to becoming better is good and makes sense but wait graham is a gun
Sorry mate, honestly sounds horrible when consider Tyson is a B grader, probably B - after prelim final showing. He is not going to help us. Martin has scratchy form so not sure how he helps us and Setterfield we getting already without need to throw away a pointy end pick. Use it for something a lot better than Tyson and Martin. You obviously rate Tyson much much higher than me. I rate him not much more value than our own Nick Graham after seeing his prelim final efforts. I want A graders, not fringe players. We got plenty of them already looking for A graders to raise their standards. We are not playing money ball with an elite pick. Leave that for picks in the 2nd and 3rd rounds when they make sense.
Just watching us beat the scum on Fox Footy - Bahaha!
I'd add 2018 pick 43 too.Not sure if has been mentioned. We could see if we could package setterfield and finlayson for our next years second + ?
Wouldn’t mind someone comparing SPS to an established player where the comparison doesn’t have to be about skin colour.... Martin, Burgoyne, Wells etc
How about Simon Black. Not fast, silky, good inside. Sps has that Pendlebury like movement in traffic too. Seems to make everyone else look slow, without him being fast.
I have assumed the connotation is to family violence or spousal abuse - you are clearly one of the few who immediately made a link.
"Mean" doesn't have to be abuse in a family context, regardless of the rest of the phrase. This is an action shot from a contact sport where aggression and physicality are fairly decent attributes.
I understand the importance of language and the value of its meaning in promoting causes... but lighten up. I am a little tired of those that presume to tell me how to react.
Taking this tone actually does more harm than good. - Call something/someone out by all means but always do it in a way that includes rather than shames. The alternative is to lessen your position while doing little to engender the sort of change you wish to see, rather you help foster an unwarranted sense of victim-hood in the those who have offended through ignorance rather than malice.