Bluemour Discussion Thread XVII - Coniglio means Rabbit in Italian!

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
No dusty no rance. Yeah we had good players out but not as impactful as those 2
Go have a look at the results of the last game that the tigers played in 2016.... And then try to work out how they managed to win the flag the following year.

We are on the improve. Rome wasn’t built in a day. Your words suggest you are either an opposition supporter who has set up a Carlton account to troll... or you are a fair weather supporter. Go buy a Crows membership next year. You will fit in well with them.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Same source who mentioned the Dale Bleach ‘rumour’ earlier in the week.

Coniglio is done as long as we pick the right coach aka not Voss. 1.25/1.3m over 7 heavily front loaded as others have mentioned.

Papley wants to come back to vic and too us but Swans will make it very hard. Looks like we’ll be paying overs (more than Adelaides 1st).

Not Carlton related but the Saints will offer Roughy a 1 year deal for 2020. Roughy probably says yes if it’s 2 but Saints rightly hesitant.

Let's hope he is right again.

If Papley requests a trade it will get done. Swans might play hard ball but no point keeping a bloke at the club who doesn't want to be there.
 
Let's hope he is right again.

If Papley requests a trade it will get done. Swans might play hard ball but no point keeping a bloke at the club who doesn't want to be there.

I think pick 9-10 is fair, don't be dickheads with us now Swans. Campaigners give away players to other clubs but will play hard ball with us.
 
Same source who mentioned the Dale Bleach ‘rumour’ earlier in the week.

Coniglio is done as long as we pick the right coach aka not Voss. 1.25/1.3m over 7 heavily front loaded as others have mentioned.

Papley wants to come back to vic and too us but Swans will make it very hard. Looks like we’ll be paying overs (more than Adelaides 1st).

Not Carlton related but the Saints will offer Roughy a 1 year deal for 2020. Roughy probably says yes if it’s 2 but Saints rightly hesitant.
That's a nice connection you've got there. 99% of us haven't heard of Dale Bleach...quite an obscure bit of info you arrived at.
 
We can’t turn it around the same way Brisbane have because we don’t have a home ground. Docklands is more or less an interstate trip for us. St best it’s a neutral ground. We rarely get wins there. That just leaves the MCG where we play our best footy.

The Dogs are the only Docklands tenant to win a flag and that’s a damning stat. Docklands is an albatross around the neck of every team who plays there. It gives us no advantage whatsoever. Look at Geelong. Look at Hawthorn with Launceston. Look at the Eagles. Hell, even Richmond, Collingwood, and Melbourne get an advantage playing at the MCG. We get nothing.

How much would we give to start on 5-6 free wins each year the way Geelong and Hawthorn do because of massive, massive home ground advantages?
Do you know by chance how long are we contracted to Docklands and if we can have MCG as homeground after that?

Hopefully the AFL will come to their senses before then and let us play a few games (against Suns, GWS etc) at Princes Park.
 
Same source who mentioned the Dale Bleach ‘rumour’ earlier in the week.

Coniglio is done as long as we pick the right coach aka not Voss. 1.25/1.3m over 7 heavily front loaded as others have mentioned.

Papley wants to come back to vic and too us but Swans will make it very hard. Looks like we’ll be paying overs (more than Adelaides 1st).

Not Carlton related but the Saints will offer Roughy a 1 year deal for 2020. Roughy probably says yes if it’s 2 but Saints rightly hesitant.
How reliable is your source?
 
No dusty no rance. Yeah we had good players out but not as impactful as those 2
Mate, were you at the game today? Score line flatters Richmond immensely due to their polish playing in those conditions. They took their chances, we didn’t. Look at the key stats, Carlton very much controlled much of the game, just made a few costly errors. Richmond a more seasoned outfit with hardened bodies that thrive in wet weather conditions.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I think pick 9-10 is fair, don't be dickheads with us now Swans. Campaigners give away players to other clubs but will play hard ball with us.

Pretty certain the Swans are very reasonable to do business with. If Papley wants out and wants to come to us then a deal will be pretty easy to accommodate for both teams.
 
Do you know by chance how long are we contracted to Docklands and if we can have MCG as homeground after that?

Hopefully the AFL will come to their senses before then and let us play a few games (against Suns, GWS etc) at Princes Park.

I don't think the MCG has the capacity for another full time tenant, we need to split our games somewhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top