Bluemour Discussion Thread XVIII - Please Sir, Can We Have More?

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
So Leon Cameron is confident. Carlton is confident. Hawthorn is confident. Hmmm

I think I posted this the other day. Makes complete sense to me. Coniglio/Petroro are going to be very positive towards any club they're speaking with, which will make that club feel confident. Dollars aside, the feedback to clubs will be inherently positive. Same story with Shiel last year. So the ITKs are getting the good mail from clubs who are genuinely confident.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Serious obsession with Coniglio in here. Do people expect an update every day?

He prob hasn’t made up his mind yet. He’s got heaps of time to sort it out.
i need to know when he shits, showers, what he has for breakfast, lunch and dinner, when he goes to sleep and when he wakes up.......................
 
I think I posted this the other day. Makes complete sense to me. Coniglio/Petroro are going to be very positive towards any club they're speaking with, which will make that club feel confident. Dollars aside, the feedback to clubs will be inherently positive. Same story with Shiel last year. So the ITKs are getting the good mail from clubs who are genuinely confident.
Hmm, that’s not so difficult to counter. Just put a reasonable time frame on the life of the offer, after which the player manager can no longer continue to bank offers; if, and its merely an if, thats what he/she is doing.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

One thing that hasn't really been discussed is what we'd be prepared to pay for Coniglio if he chose Carlton, given we're also apparently in the hunt for players like Papley and Jack Martin.

And before people start jumping down my throat, I know he's a RFA. But if GWS match our offer, then we'd be forced to trade for him.

Sam McClure discussed this tonight and it does make sense. If Cogs chooses us or the Dawks through free agency, GWS just match the offer. They're fully aware he won't be with them next year, but will get more through a trade than through free agency. If Andrew Dillon from the AFL asks how they are going to fit him into their current salary cap, they just say "we'll either trade other players, or adjust existing contracts to create space".

Apparently it's one of the reasons we can't start negotiating with other players until it all becomes clearer. It's also another reason why we would likely be interested in Ellis through FA if we don't have a lot of trade currency remaining.

So it may all get down to what we'd be prepared to give up for him if by chance he chooses us.
 
Fair call on the flag. But just rekon we got talent underneath that will be better. If it holds back a spot for say Stocker i say no.

Ellis is at his best out on a wing. Don't think he's competing with Stocker for a spot in the side.

Also don't think there's anything wrong with bolstering our depth via free agency, even if we don't land the big fish. There are plenty of options out there who can improve us from next season and I think Ellis is one such player.
 
They said months ago they wont match. And why would they if a player doesn't wish to be there?

I'm not sure they will match, but the motives for doing so are clear.

If they do match but Cogs is intent on leaving, they'll get a hell of a lot more for him via trade than via free agency compensation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top