Clubs all do due diligence when recruiting players now. Walsh's back issues are well known. If we do trade him it won't be at anywhere near his true value.What if we know his back issue will never get better?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Clubs all do due diligence when recruiting players now. Walsh's back issues are well known. If we do trade him it won't be at anywhere near his true value.What if we know his back issue will never get better?
Cerra and our first rounder this year and a first or a good second next year (i.e if we get a second rounder from WCE or something)
Agree, there’s work to be done, Curely’s boy needs to freshen our playing list.I’ve said for a long time we would run out of steam this season. We need to bring in some youth assp.
What we are currently seeing has been on the cards all year
Ahh, wot?
Cerra - an okay midfielder with 5x hamstring injuries in 12 months + 2x (likely) late 1sts?
Petracca is a multiple AA, Brownlow medalist and a genuine bona-fide star of the comp.. with 5 years on his contract.
If they're losing him they'd be seeking to replace him with an immediate need, like a key forward. They can pick up a Cerra-type from anywhere.
They'd ask for McKay + a 1st, and rightly so.
No Brownlow - maybe one day ??
We'd be the laughing stock of the comp to give up McKay and our 1st so won't happen.
Won a norm smithCould've sworn he won a couple of years ago, my bad.
It's definitely overpaying but if it netted us a flag it would be worth it.
We've backed this group in for a long time now, with minimal results. Not saying the axe should be swung and we should start turfing players, but I wouldn't mind us taking a risk somewhere with our list this off-season.
Would I be ok with trading one of our stars? If it gets someone like Petracca then.. maybe.
Could've sworn he won a couple of years ago, my bad.
It's definitely overpaying but if it netted us a flag it would be worth it.
We've backed this group in for a long time now, with minimal results. Not saying the axe should be swung and we should start turfing players, but I wouldn't mind us taking a risk somewhere with our list this off-season.
Would I be ok with trading one of our stars? If it gets someone like Petracca then.. maybe.
Petracca is worth way more.McKay clearly worth more than Petracca.
Especially because he doesn't want to leave.
Cmon everyone, if we’re prepared to trade a Harry or Walshy, you don’t do it for a 29yr old, coming off a serious injury, with no guarantee he ever gets back to his best, who may only have 3/4 seasons left at the elite level.
Now if it was to try and get a Harley Reid, then you’re talking some sense.
Not when he wants to leave because your side is a basketcase run by a druggie.Petracca is worth way more.
McKay clearly worth more than Petracca.
Especially because he doesn't want to leave.
TDK 2nd tall/ruck reliefPetracca: 3x AA, 1x Norm Smith, 2x BnF. Has ripped games apart and won games off his own boot multiple times - genuinely powerful mid who can do it in the middle or down fwd. 29yo with a huge contract is also iffy, weirdly increases his trade value due to the power Melbourne hold, but decreases it as a player because it's a gross contract & a high risk to the club taking it on.
McKay: 1x AA, 1x Coleman. KPF's are way harder to find so that boosts his value. 27yo, prime age for a KPF who should still have plenty of good years.
It's close when factoring in all of that.
Love Harry, but with Charlie down there, I've often thought we could get by with a workhorse CHF who can simply take a defender and get out of Charlie's way, feel Harry's potential superstardom is wasted a bit. His kicking, whilst improved is still iffy & I don't think I could ever trust him to nail them in big finals.
If Harry was open to it, I'd look at it.
I think trade value inflation has gone up since then, particularly with future draft picks an option now.Sorry but Judd was worth 2 early firsts and a player at his absolute peak when he was barely 24 years old.
Petracca is 29 next year, people saying he'd cost multiple firsts and a player are a way off. Nobody in their late 20s is worth multiple firsts and a player, absolutely nobody. Certainly no team would be stupid enough to do a deal for that price at the very least.
Sorry but Judd was worth 2 early firsts and a player at his absolute peak when he was barely 24 years old.
Petracca is 29 next year, people saying he'd cost multiple firsts and a player are a way off. Nobody in their late 20s is worth multiple firsts and a player, absolutely nobody. Certainly no team would be stupid enough to do a deal for that price at the very least.
Cripps would be worth 1 good first round pick. The difference is the value he brings to our team is far greater than any compensation a team would pay for a 30 year old. Thus we'd never trade him.Judd was out of contract & held all the cards. Also different era of trading back then.
What would we want for Cripps if god forbid he wanted out? He's 30 next year.
Cripps would be worth 1 good first round pick. The difference is the value he brings to our team is far greater than any compensation a team would pay for a 30 year old. Thus we'd never trade him.
Interestingly North are targeting Viney. Could be a mass exodus at seasons end.Petracca: 3x AA, 1x Norm Smith, 2x BnF. Has ripped games apart and won games off his own boot multiple times - genuinely powerful mid who can do it in the middle or down fwd. 29yo with a huge contract is also iffy, weirdly increases his trade value due to the power Melbourne hold, but decreases it as a player because it's a gross contract & a high risk to the club taking it on.
McKay: 1x AA, 1x Coleman. KPF's are way harder to find so that boosts his value. 27yo, prime age for a KPF who should still have plenty of good years.
It's close when factoring in all of that.
Love Harry, but with Charlie down there, I've often thought we could get by with a workhorse CHF who can simply take a defender and get out of Charlie's way, feel Harry's potential superstardom is wasted a bit. His kicking, whilst improved is still iffy & I don't think I could ever trust him to nail them in big finals.
If Harry was open to it, I'd look at it.
Possibly, but given the shitshow that occurred earlier this year with his injury and all the rumours re drug use at the Dees it may be one of those 'out of our control' type trades where a player basically demands their traded or sits out.Dees probably feel the same way about Petracca.
Possibly, but given the shitshow that occurred earlier this year with his injury and all the rumours re drug use at the Dees it may be one of those 'out of our control' type trades where a player basically demands their traded or sits out.
Entirely likely. Personally, even going through a hypothetical trade just with the cap space we'd need to clear alone I wouldn't go after him. Yes our 22 might be better than previously but any semblance of depth will be gutted and we'll have bugger all to hit the draft with to replenish the list.They also did kinda almost kill him by sending him out there with that injury.
I reckon Oliver & Viney will go and they'll retain Petracca - gut feel says the players are over Oliver and the fact the club has bent over backwards to protect him.