Any chance we can swap the labels so that No Discussion is yellow as before and this discussion thread is Red Hot Topic?
Thanks
Mods, I'm going to ask again. Please?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Any chance we can swap the labels so that No Discussion is yellow as before and this discussion thread is Red Hot Topic?
Thanks
An advantage of not having 20 odd players on their injury list.If you go through their list they have a lot of draftees, rookies etc. They do it well
Nothing will ever top Bowes + Pick 7That would be the icing on GC stupidity, giving up pick 2 for Weller just because he actually wanted to go there and then fk him off for nothing a few years later is all you need to know about their incompetence
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I second the motionAny chance we can swap the labels so that No Discussion is yellow as before and this discussion thread is Red Hot Topic?
Thanks
how's that?Mods, I'm going to ask again. Please?
What's stopped him playing this year? Played the last 6 AFL rounds but no VFL this yearPretty decent player when healthy too Weller
Better, but would be great to get the original Yellow Rumour for the NO Discussion thread.how's that?
My suggestion is the "no discussion" thread is locked and stickied and mods copy to it as appropriatehow's that?
That kills the sport of reposting a verified ITK post into bluemours for a massive like uptickMy suggestion is the "no discussion" thread is locked and stickied and mods copy to it as appropriate
Fiorini is my guess.
Only just signed a long term deal this season, would be stunned if only 3 months later they dump him off as cap reliefAinsworth?
now I got Eddie Rayners brilliant keyboard solo banging away in my headi see reeeedddddd
I'm sure ferrisb is preparing a High Court injunction as we speakThat kills the sport of reposting a verified ITK post into bluemours for a massive like uptick
It’s a hotly contested sport at times
I am really happy with this approach.Message this morning from someone I trust that gets most things right. In response to questions I asked a day ago
1. SDK - No but we will always ask. He is happy at Cats
2. Houston - Port would have to move a fair bit on their position. Picks the issue not money
3. Papley - No
4. Looking at "player" to take over salary and get cheap. If his club signs their target he may be "forced" out and we will take contract
5. Petracca - Just won't happen and we could never satisfy asking price
6. Graham Wright spoken to about CEO role. Not interested in football role
7. A number of a DFA's being interviewed and having medicals
8. Perfect world we will get 2-3 first round picks
My comment: I know people would like to hear "big names" but I just can't see it. The messages to me have been consistent and for months. Draft picks, Campo twins and some targeted cheap trades or DFA's is our focus
Didn't follow it too closely but think he was coming back from a major injury. From memory an ACLWhat's stopped him playing this year? Played the last 6 AFL rounds but no VFL this year
Talk to Kane about that, although he's looking at length as well as dollars I guess
View attachment 2129822
Talk to Kane about that, although he's looking at length as well as dollars I guess
View attachment 2129822
Tolstoy has been getting more and more nervous reading this and the Bluemour File thread.
I'm missing my very favorite ITK RoyalBlues
View attachment 2129821
My guess is Darcy Parish.4 would rule out Kelly.
Forced out. Would make me think it's an older player from a better team or team on the rise.
Also suggests a club confident of getting another player in on a good contract.
Who would be excess to Geelong's midfield if they're getting both Smith and Oliver?
Jargar O'Meara if Freo get Kelly?
The AFL can’t stop someone earning (to a certain point) but in this case of his Cotton On commitments increase he can validate that with the extra side income. As this is prior contract, the T&C’s should remain the same on remuneration for output.Just reading up on TPP and additional player payments. It seems to state that it’s the afl discretion to approve additional funding from a teams sponsor. Hence the removal of judds in 2012 after getting extra from 2008-2011. As smith already has an existing arrangement with cotton on it will only come up if that arrangement is altered once he states he’s signing with Geelong (today). If Geelong were prepared for this they would have got him a nice pay rise from cotton on throughout this season under the proviso he signs for 2025. It’s going to be messy for the afl and if the media get a hold of a sniff of this (it’s already going to look insane if smith and Oliver both come to Geelong) this will be a huge story over the coming weeks of the trade period.
View attachment 2129572