- Oct 4, 2018
- 10,173
- 25,841
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Arsenal & NY Knicks
Wouldn't surprise me if SOS split 8 to try and get one ahead
Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII
- Thread starter The Old Dark Navy's
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Moderator
- #2,227
Especially given he can play multiple roles, including 3rd tall forward which is a flexibility need for us.
![C4[2]Yo`DooR](https://www.bigfootycontent.com/avatars/m/21/21849.jpg?1724656646){kind=avatar}
- Dec 18, 2005
- 17,736
- 27,961
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- GAVROI MOUNIA... GAMW TON PIRAEA
I legit can’t tell if that’s a pattern on his shirt or if he’s wearing a bra underneath?
Look at his chest as he walks … you can’t unsee it!
Dunna Heartknee
Club Legend
- Jul 4, 2020
- 1,986
- 6,276
- AFL Club
- Carlton
StanleyBeren
Draftee
- Sep 19, 2024
- 4
- 6
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Considering we’re not bringing in any high price recruits for 2025 we’re sorted for next year. He’s off the books after that anyway if we’re not getting anything for him.
Same result but we get another year with a valuable player on the books.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Unless we're getting a miracle play like Smith or Petracca into the club I don't see why we would need to clear Kennedy's salary off the books in 25, as surely the 25 salary cap is already set with Kennedy's contract included. If Kennedy does move it would allow us to shift salary from our higher rated players into 2025 - say $50-100k of each of Cripps, Weitering, Charlie, Harry and Williams and therefore free up up to $1m in 2026, but that would be about it.
- Jun 4, 2016
- 13,342
- 40,808
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Might be one of those sports bra things that have got quite popular. Kanes still a ****ing good runner
- Apr 4, 2018
- 17,321
- 35,805
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Do we need to clear cap space for tdk?
- Oct 4, 2015
- 13,274
- 24,960
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Could there be something brewing for the final day?
Talk of Kennedy to Dogs, Kemp potentially to Saints...
CARL
OUT: Kemp + Kennedy
IN: 8
WB
OUT: Daniel + Macrae
IN: Kennedy + 32
STAINS
OUT: 8 + 32
IN: Kemp + Macrae + Daniel
This gives the Dogs extra currency to facilitate a trade for O'Halloran from GWS. Effectively replacing Daniel and Macrae with Kennedy and O'Halloran whilst also relieving them of Caleb's salary.
Stains are ponying up a bit here, but if you want a contracted KPP that is starting 22 who was drafted as a first round pick and we've put years of development into... then you pay a premium. Also, if you "absolutely" think Battle is worth 8, then surely Kemp + Macrae + Daniel is worth pick 8 and 32...
We get another pick before the bid... at the cost of losing 2 contracted players which will also hurt our depth. But it's a pretty good pick...
Anything involving 30+ for either Kennedy or Kemp is pointless. We won't be enticed to do so unless we trade each of them for a pick in the 30's that we can combine into a mid 20's pick... I don't care how strong this draft is, losing those 2 for the sake of a mid 20's pick is just not worth it...
Talk of Kennedy to Dogs, Kemp potentially to Saints...
CARL
OUT: Kemp + Kennedy
IN: 8
WB
OUT: Daniel + Macrae
IN: Kennedy + 32
STAINS
OUT: 8 + 32
IN: Kemp + Macrae + Daniel
This gives the Dogs extra currency to facilitate a trade for O'Halloran from GWS. Effectively replacing Daniel and Macrae with Kennedy and O'Halloran whilst also relieving them of Caleb's salary.
Stains are ponying up a bit here, but if you want a contracted KPP that is starting 22 who was drafted as a first round pick and we've put years of development into... then you pay a premium. Also, if you "absolutely" think Battle is worth 8, then surely Kemp + Macrae + Daniel is worth pick 8 and 32...
We get another pick before the bid... at the cost of losing 2 contracted players which will also hurt our depth. But it's a pretty good pick...
Anything involving 30+ for either Kennedy or Kemp is pointless. We won't be enticed to do so unless we trade each of them for a pick in the 30's that we can combine into a mid 20's pick... I don't care how strong this draft is, losing those 2 for the sake of a mid 20's pick is just not worth it...
thanks for pointing that out...
- Jun 2, 2019
- 677
- 1,871
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Can’t believe clubs are trading out of the best draft since 2001
We will draft the next 10 yr star
We will draft the next 10 yr star
- Jun 4, 2016
- 13,342
- 40,808
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Looks pretty bad for the dogs but something may indeed be up
Correct, absolute effort is his one wood and that’s exactly what you need as a key defender
Don’t think he was a great forward at all, and imo was looking at being left out more often than not up forward.
Now get little Durds in the guts ffs
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- Aug 25, 2014
- 1,407
- 3,436
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Norwood
Heart rate monitor. He’s big on running and fitness
I believe it’s called a bro- or a manzier
4flagsin5yrs
Premiership Player
Any team with Jakovich, Woosha and McKenna i the back six....terrific.
Brennan very capable too...
Last edited:
- Jul 13, 2018
- 1,158
- 2,653
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Yes please, I feel like Moraes is a bit underrated on this board, would love him in navy blue
The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #2,245
How about this:
Blues: Out: Kennedy, Kemp In: Busslinger, 35
Dogs: Out: Busslinger, 35 In: Kennedy, 22
Saints: Out: 8 In: Kemp, 22
Swans: Out: 19, 22: In: 8
Rationale:
Kemp does not have a clear position right now. It's not down back, it could be up forward, it's not midfield. We are looking at JSOS for CHB, but our coverage is Young. Busslinger is 198cms and has a footy IQ.
Dogs have Jones for another year, Lobb for another couple, and can't play Darcy, JUH and Naughton up forward together very much. Darcy and Naughton are the swingmen so can go back. Plus Dale plays tall.
The Saints and Swans pick swap speaks for itself.
Edit: Or more straightforward.
Saints and Swans do the swap. Saints give us 19 and 47 for Kemp. Dogs give us 35 for Kennedy. We hope Trainor falls to us for we grab another 18 year old tall.
Blues: Out: Kennedy, Kemp In: Busslinger, 35
Dogs: Out: Busslinger, 35 In: Kennedy, 22
Saints: Out: 8 In: Kemp, 22
Swans: Out: 19, 22: In: 8
Rationale:
Kemp does not have a clear position right now. It's not down back, it could be up forward, it's not midfield. We are looking at JSOS for CHB, but our coverage is Young. Busslinger is 198cms and has a footy IQ.
Dogs have Jones for another year, Lobb for another couple, and can't play Darcy, JUH and Naughton up forward together very much. Darcy and Naughton are the swingmen so can go back. Plus Dale plays tall.
The Saints and Swans pick swap speaks for itself.
Edit: Or more straightforward.
Saints and Swans do the swap. Saints give us 19 and 47 for Kemp. Dogs give us 35 for Kennedy. We hope Trainor falls to us for we grab another 18 year old tall.
- Apr 16, 2008
- 10,765
- 31,026
- AFL Club
- Carlton
We won’t need to clear his wage but there’s benefits in doing it. Sounds as if he has signed with the dogs
- Oct 4, 2015
- 13,274
- 24,960
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Maybe not the best result, but why pretty bad?
There's talk they need to relieve Caleb's salary from their books so that could be extra incentive.
If Kennedy's on his way to the Dogs,might be cutting it fine with the Dogs,got alot going on with Smith and Daniels.
bradfisher14
Not actually Brad Fisher
Kennedy deal will be straight forward. Austin has a great relationship with them.
The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #2,250
They have 35, 48 and picks coming in for the other two. Should be a simple agreement in there somewhere.
Similar threads
