- Banned
- #76
Danger tackled him long after the ballJust like Danger's wasn't?
Was gone. Grundy didn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Danger tackled him long after the ballJust like Danger's wasn't?
Based on current system he wouldn't get 2 even if guilty. 1 would be the max.He's not getting off. In fact he'll get two.
Danger tackled him long after the ball
Was gone. Grundy didn't.
Danger tackled him long after the ball
Was gone. Grundy didn't.
Brown put his head into the turf when he didn't need to. At no stage did Grundy slam him. Brown almost bounced his head back and forth which shows it wasn't Grundy who motioned the action.Completely irrelevant where the ball is. Read the MRP ruling on Dangerfield - the fact Kreuzer no longer had possession is not even mentioned.
Grundy pinned both of Brown's arms and slammed him head first into the turf, not preventing him from bracing his fall.
The impact of Danger's tackle was labelled medium - Kreuzer walked off the ground and was BOG today. Given Brown was stretchered off and is now in hospital, the impact of Grundy's tackle has to be cited as severe.
You Collingwood supporters are in for a nasty surprise on Monday afternoon.
Based on current system he wouldn't get 2 even if guilty. 1 would be the max.
Oops! Hawks hate it when others get more attention than them.
So they both drove a players head into the ground and caused injury?
According to the AFL this means weeks off
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
You're wrong.
Careless conduct, high contact, high impact.
3 weeks down to 2 - as per current MRP guidelines.
Yep, it cant be classed any lower than that... unless he has a bad record - which I dont think he has.
Danger tackled him long after the ball
Was gone. Grundy didn't.
The only people calling for Grundy's head are bitter BF posters. The media and hq have all but cleared the action even after Dangers dog act.
Who?
He'll get off. This is how the cycle goes:
Media identifies issue->AFL get sucked in so have to find a single hoop jumpered player to make an example of->non-Geelong players continue to do identical actions with no consequence.
This needs to stop!!
A serious injury waiting to happen with these tackles.
Anyone that thinks it's the perfect tackle is totally ignorant to the fact that these tackles are regarded as dangerous and players will be suspended.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Who's daddy got her the job.Herald Sun journalist.
Brown went to hospital in an ambulance no way he gets off three weeks down to two minimum.He'll get off. This is how the cycle goes:
Media identifies issue->AFL get sucked in so have to find a single hoop jumpered player to make an example of->non-Geelong players continue to do identical actions with no consequence.