TradeDraft
Post-Human
- Thread starter
- #951
Then don't be so outside. Go & get the footy.
Just doing what Coaches are telling him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then don't be so outside. Go & get the footy.
Just doing what Coaches are telling him
Played most of the game for 1 kick & 1 handball. I love the kid. But he has dropped off big time for some reason.
We are playing more corridor which means he gets the less of the ball when he plays on the wing.
Needs form in the VFL (when its operational again).
I still love you, Caleb.
He's a promising talent for us, and --unless he's physically cooked-- shouldn't be dropped under any circumstances.
Wing under Bucks was the easiest role in the AFL. Had to run a lot, but held your spacing and got a lot of uncontested footy. I think Harvey is using the wings differently.Played most of the game for 1 kick & 1 handball. I love the kid. But he has dropped off big time for some reason.
He did not play most of the game, just over a half but yes he was MIA for most of that time. He is a keeper though.
Wing under Bucks was the easiest role in the AFL. Had to run a lot, but held your spacing and got a lot of uncontested footy. I think Harvey is using the wings differently.
Could be wrong, but I get the impression that we've tightened our wings in and are thus not allowing as easy exits from defence for opposition teams.or Not Using it
Maybe its a case of no Josh Thomas ...No CollingwoodThe whole team went MIA about the time he came on
Thought him being the sub was absurd, even before he came on. Why would you make an out of form 18 year old the sub, especially one with such high endurance?
Thought him being the sub was absurd, even before he came on. Why would you make an out of form 18 year old the sub, especially one with such high endurance?
Who was a better option as the medical sub?