I'am sure you are all aware now that in todays Herald Sun Mike Sheahan named the West Coast Eagle player who nearly died in Las Vegas.
And i quote from Mike Sheahan's article
'Late last year, it was reported that a preimership player almost died on a recent players' trip to Las Vegas. The report did't mention drugs, but the industry soon knew exactly who had done exactly what'.
'The player supposedly is West Coasts 2006 premiership player Chad Fletcher, commonly believed to have almost died after an episode with an illicit substance that put him in hospital'.
So he names the player with out any solid proof, accuses him of using illicit substances, and uses words such as 'supposedly' to put together his article. Now we at Bigfooty, legally, because of this article are allowed to use Chad Fletchers name. Opposed to the 3 footballers that were actually caught by the AFL for using 'illicit substances'. Bit unfair on Chad isn't it?
And i quote from Mike Sheahan's article
'Late last year, it was reported that a preimership player almost died on a recent players' trip to Las Vegas. The report did't mention drugs, but the industry soon knew exactly who had done exactly what'.
'The player supposedly is West Coasts 2006 premiership player Chad Fletcher, commonly believed to have almost died after an episode with an illicit substance that put him in hospital'.
So he names the player with out any solid proof, accuses him of using illicit substances, and uses words such as 'supposedly' to put together his article. Now we at Bigfooty, legally, because of this article are allowed to use Chad Fletchers name. Opposed to the 3 footballers that were actually caught by the AFL for using 'illicit substances'. Bit unfair on Chad isn't it?