A bit premature with this.Hall of fame player no doubt. Top 10 in the game ATM. But won’t be the goat. Just does not have the devastating kicking skills or goal scoring nous of some of the greats.
Also top ten in the comp ATM.
Debatable
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join the Sweet FA and sign up for State Of Origin! Rivalry, Banter and New Friends made along the way in Bigfooty’s own AFL-Style simulated game. Everyone Welcome! -- Sweet Football Association - Since 2001 AD
A bit premature with this.Hall of fame player no doubt. Top 10 in the game ATM. But won’t be the goat. Just does not have the devastating kicking skills or goal scoring nous of some of the greats.
Cripps, Curnow, Weitering. That is just from his own team.Hall of fame player no doubt. Top 10 in the game ATM. But won’t be the goat. Just does not have the devastating kicking skills or goal scoring nous of some of the greats.
A bit premature with this.
Also top ten in the comp ATM.
Debatable
A bit premature with this.
Also top ten in the comp ATM.
Debatable
Fogarty unlucky.I have him in my top 3. And rising.
1. Curnow
2. Cripps
3. Walsh
4. Heney
5. Weitering
6. Bontempelli
7. McKay
8. Petracca
9. Heeney
10. Acres
Fogarty unlucky.
Bay13
You missed HeneeyI have him in my top 3. And rising.
1. Curnow
2. Cripps
3. Walsh
4. Heney
5. Weitering
6. Bontempelli
7. McKay
8. Petracca
9. Heeney
10. Acres
Ah, that's where he misspelt Fogarty.You missed Heneey
You missed Heneey
Ah, that's where he misspelt Fogarty.
33 and a snag for the future GOAT.
Dominant. As per normal.
Walsh isn’t playing against plumbers and milkmen though. That’s why he’s the future GOATThat would be a dismal game for Leigh Matthews
33 and a snag for the future GOAT.
Dominant. As per normal.
You know they have both taken contested marks before. Just saying....Zeor contested marks. In fact, Walsh and Cripps had 74 touches between them an ZERO contested marks. I guess they are both seagulls.
You know they have both taken contested marks before. Just saying....
So, room for improvement then ?Given they didn't take a contested mark, then, I'd say Carlton won in spite of these two seagulls.
Zeor contested marks. In fact, Walsh and Cripps had 74 touches between them an ZERO contested marks. I guess they are both seagulls.
Nick Daicos has never taken a contested mark, just like his brother and father.
Biggest chip scab family in the business.
Can't blame them for seeing GOAT in the thread title and defaulting to Daicos.I thought this was a Walsh thread. Does Naicos live rent free in the head of Carlton supporters?
Nicky does that every second game and he's fineWill have a very short career if he doesn’t stop that stupid move trying to plough his own head into the turf to cheat and win a free. Carlton must train for that manoeuvre