Carlton’s soul exorcised, I am disappointed

Remove this Banner Ad

Those Authoritarian coaches also hug and have a great relationship with their players.

Look at Sir Alex for the definitive example of it.

And Malthouse has a great relationship with his players on a personal level as well.

Authoritarian coaches also don't hesitate to send you to the reserves when you fall out of line.

Personally I'm stumped on what to do with Carlton's coaching situation.
 
And Malthouse has a great relationship with his players on a personal level as well.

Authoritarian coaches also don't hesitate to send you to the reserves when you fall out of line.

Personally I'm stumped on what to do with Carlton's coaching situation.
Mick needs a new game plan that can use Carltons strengths, He is still using the same game plan that he used in 2010-11
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Those Authoritarian coaches also hug and have a great relationship with their players
Mick has a great relationship with exactly one of his players...

894783-mick-mathouse-amp-dale-thomas.jpg
 
Did someone break your sarcasm detector?


West Coast draft Judd as a PP and he won you a flag.

The AFL handed you your first two flags with the draft concessions you received on start up.

You didn't earn those flags because of good recruiting.


This needs to be debunked every 6 months or so

A WA state side?

In 1986 the WA State of Origin side played Victoria in July.

Of the 22 in that side, the following players were on the Eagles list at the start of 1987:

Geoff Miles, Shane Ellis, Dean Laidley, Ross Glendinning, Peter Davidson, Phil Narkle, Andrew MacNish, Laurie Keene, Dwayne Lamb, Colin Waterson. Thats 10.

The 12 players who werent on our list were Brad Hardie, Rod Lester-Smith, Leon Baker, Gary Buckenara, Peter Sartori, Peter Wilson, Brian Peake, Maurice Rioli, Michael Mitchell, Wayne Blackwell, Paul Harding, Mark Bairstow.

In other words the Eagles got the fringe players left after the VFL teams took the cream.

Of those 10 players, precisely one played in a Premiership for West Coast (Dwayne Lamb). 2 of the players who went to Victoria were subsequently traded back to West Coast (in normal trade deals) and both played in premiership sides (Wilson 92, 94 & Harding 92).

The following West Australians (off the top of my head) were playing for other VFL sides in 1987:

Jim Krakouer, Phil Krakouer, Mike Richardson, Michael Christian, Craig Starcevich, John Ironmonger, Wayne Henwood, Craig Holden, Simon Beasley, Phil Cronan, Andrew Purser, Murray Rance, Warren Dean, Earl Spalding, Alan Johnson, Steve Turner, Nicky Winmar, Jon Dorotich, Bill Duckworth, Ken Judge, Ken Hunter, Richard Dennis etc

So apart from those 22 and the 12 from our SOO side of 86 (thats 34 players by the way) West Coasts initial list of 37 was a state side :rolleyes:

In case some arent across history, the Eagles commenced with a list of 37 players v existing VFL sides which had 52. It is true that we had first choice of WAFL players at the end of 1986 but this was only after the other sides had delayed the entry of the Eagles so that players including Wilson, Sartori, Dennis, Winmar, Bairstow, Mitchell, Spalding, Christian, Starcevich and Dean, were first signed by VFL teams before the Eagles were granted a licence. So we got the best 37 players from the WAFL after the best 10 from 1986 were already signed up by Vic clubs. Given that 10 players from WA would be a good number in the annual draft, the balance were essentially the leftovers, late round picks if you like.

At the end of 1987, we did not participate in the draft but instead again got unrestricted access to the WAFL. The same WAFL that in the previous season had 47 players taken from it i.e. there wasnt much left.

At the end of 1988, the Eagles got 5 priority picks (again WAFL only) and then took place in a draft that was compromised in that all the other clubs could only take 1 player each from the WAFL (huge concession :rolleyes:)

In 1989, we were down to 2 pre-draft selections (compare this with Brisbane's 6 and Sydneys 4). Again, all teams were then restricted to one WAFL player, this resulted in the unusual situation of 6 of the first 9 picks being from WA. West Coast with its normal first round pick at 4 (based on finsihing 4th last in 1988) got Matera. Then players such as Brad Rowe, Mark Brayshaw, Stephen Edgar, Brad Tunbridge, Dale Kickett, Ben Allan, Gavin Rose, Peter Cransberg & Dennis Repacholi were picked up before West Coast got Tony Evans (64), Brett Heady (92), Dean Kemp (117).... So every club passed on those 3. No concession at all.

1990, West Coast got 2 pre-draft picks, again, Sydney got 6 and Brisbane 5.

The Eagles pre-draft picks and the concessions on WAFL picks (one per club) were to compensate for the Eagles having a smaller list than other clubs (15 players less) and to allow that list to be lifted up over a 5 year period to limit damage that would be inflicted on the WAFL if they had just allowed 50 in year one + unlimited drafts thereafter. It wasnt a concession as such, it was a drip system to allow us to build our list to the same size as other clubs over an extended period and limit WAFL damage. The Eagles last pre-draft pick was in 1991. Remember, these picks werent the number 1 pick in Australia but rather the best player in WA from a comp that had been decimated - and has never recovered.

The Eagles skill/luck in its first 5 years was that the predatory behaviour pre West Coast of VFL clubs and the delay in its introduction in 1986, forced them to take on a ton of unproven kids. This was extended over a 5 year period by the list size restriction which was dealt with by given us priority access to a couple of WAFL players each year for 4 years. Basically, we were forced into a situation of picking up the best kids in WA over a 4 year period which just happened to coincide with the best WA Under 18 side in history. We inadvertently stumbled on the recipe for building a good side - draft as many talented kids as possible in a short time frame. We were assisted in this by the abject amateurism of VFL sides re the draft at that stage that saw them overlook some talented kids. I mean 3 guys got drafted ahead of Matera and every club overlooked Kemp & Heady all in the one draft.

West Coast of the early 90's was a great side because it drafted lots of kids and came up with the formula that works in the draft era.

We were nowhere near gifted a state side. A state side was the 35+ gun WA players running around for other sides in 1987.

I mean imagine is we had started with a real state side:

Leon Baker, Maurice Rioli, Gary Buckenara, Phil Krakouer, Jim Krakouer, Nicky Winmar, Brad Hardie, Simon Beasley, Earl Spalding, Peter Sartori, Andrew Purser, Ken Hunter, Wayne Blackwell, Mark Bairstow, Rod Lester-Smith, Jon Dorotich, Bill Duckworth, Michael Christian, Michael Mitchell, etc

Then you would have had something to whinge about....
 
Mick needs a new game plan that can use Carltons strengths, He is still using the same game plan that he used in 2010-11

We are doing worse though. No defensive pressure at all in any part of the ground, no two way running and skills have degraded badly over the years.

For a team that is playing a defensive game plan we seem to turn it over more then anyone and we consistently kick it to outnumbered contests.
 
A fair section of Carlton supporters deserve to cop a pasting. Carlton's BF is a perfect example of why. So many sycophants who couldnt handle any time someone criticised the club and their drafting. Naturally anyone who questioned it and called it out for what it was got shouted down or banned from the board because they would get accused of being a troll or because the inner circle circle jerk didn't like what they were saying.

Now that minoirty has become the majority with even the sycophants finally realising the average down hill skiing list that had been assembled

This all harks back to the "We're Carlton **** the rest attitude". This resulted in a w***er attitude that we some how would just become good again by virtue of our history.

To all the muppets blaming Malthouse get the roses coloured glasses off. What you see now isn't malthouse team. This is the average list that Ratten helped put together along with all the other clowns like Hughes and Kernahan.

I hope Mick stays because he's the only one who has the balls to stand up to all of these sycophants and make the ahrd call on shit, soft below average players careers at this club.
 
We are doing worse though. No defensive pressure at all in any part of the ground, no two way running and skills have degraded badly over the years.

For a team that is playing a defensive game plan we seem to turn it over more then anyone and we consistently kick it to outnumbered contests.

We drop basic chest marks 10 year olds would take. That's nothing to do with anyone but the players.
 
Carlton, Richmond and Melbourne have proved that tanking does not work, especially when it damages the culture of the club. while you could say Hawthorn, St Kilda and Collingwood (1 year) tanked in the early to mid naughties, they didn't do so to such an extent as the former 3 clubs and with the exception of Collingwood for that 1 year (2005) I think Hawthorn and St Kilda were generally crap for those few years where they were getting high draft picks. if you look at the past decade, all premierships were won by clubs who maintained a strong culture even through their bad periods
 
Because he's a proven coach with a very good record, who is good at rebuilding teams. He's miserable? What the **** is this, high school? This is a professional environment, if the players don't like him because he is "grumpy" then they can sod off. That's not an excuse to be lazy and insipid, it is something a little league player would use as an excuse!
Don't get me wrong, the players aren't doing themselves any justice. All I'm saying is as impressive as his career has been, Malthouse's 'proven track record' isn't doing wonders at the moment. I have no idea what's going on at Carlton, all I have to see is the results. Now if, in a years time, the Blues have dug themselves out of this hole that they're in, then that'll be all swell, but the fact is, just because he's had success at other clubs, it doesn't mean anything when you look at the mess Carlton's in at the moment. Malthouse shouldn't be taking any crap and the players shouldn't give him any, and yes the players have been weak and brittle, and they deserve crap for it, but the coach should at least take some responsibility for his teams performances. Otherwise we'd just ditch coaches altogether, because according to you it's 100% the players' fault.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Carlton, Richmond and Melbourne have proved that tanking does not work, especially when it damages the culture of the club. while you could say Hawthorn, St Kilda and Collingwood (1 year) tanked in the early to mid naughties, they didn't do so to such an extent as the former 3 clubs and with the exception of Collingwood for that 1 year (2005) I think Hawthorn and St Kilda were generally crap for those few years where they were getting high draft picks. if you look at the past decade, all premierships were won by clubs who maintained a strong culture even through their bad periods

We didn't tank. We got butt r*ped by the AFL when they took years of picks away from us.

Every year we got a #1 pick, we were shit.
 
We didn't tank. We got butt r*ped by the AFL when they took years of picks away from us.

Every year we got a #1 pick, we were shit.

remember the kreuzer cup? Carlton tanked all through 2007 no doubt about it, even in the prior two years I reckon they could have won a few more games had they tried. playing to lose in those years has scarred the club
 
remember the kreuzer cup? Carlton tanked all through 2007 no doubt about it, even in the prior two years I reckon they could have won a few more games had they tried. playing to lose in those years has scarred the club

In 2007 our list was still rubbish. We've had a rubbish list since the days of Pagan.

To say "if they tried" is easily refuted by todays results as we've always has a fair amount of peahearts on the list that didn't try consistently.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

remember the kreuzer cup? Carlton tanked all through 2007 no doubt about it, even in the prior two years I reckon they could have won a few more games had they tried. playing to lose in those years has scarred the club

For Matthew Kreuzner also. Worth it? Cotchin, Dangerfield, Rioli, Taylor all on the table. It still amazes me that clubs waste high picks on ruckman when it takes them so long to make a contribution and you just never know what you're going to get.
 
Melbourne, ******* Melbourne??? I thought the Lions were bad, but coming home to this result...iggest LOL. Nice one Mick, let Betts walk, but pay overs for injury prone Thomas. The new laughing stock of the competition...well done Blues.

It's true we can be laughed at. Fortunately we've won a shitload of cups so we'll never be able to claim the mantle of being among the biggest jokes of club in the league however.
 
For Matthew Kreuzner also. Worth it? Cotchin, Dangerfield, Rioli, Taylor all on the table. It still amazes me that clubs waste high picks on ruckman it takes them so long to make a contribution and you just never know what you're going to get.

Erhm, you never know what you're getting with any pick.
 
we barely won a game for five years 2002-6 but when a priority pick became a possibility we tanked ??

we were that bad ... and today we are back to where we were in 2006
 
It's true we can be laughed at. Fortunately we've won a shitload of cups so we'll never be able to claim the mantle of being among the biggest jokes of club in the league however.
Just proves that a coach is only as good as his list allows him. Your list at the moment is shithouse, maybe the worse in the league. Murphy, although a good player, is NOT a leader...he couldn't lead the Titanic into an iceberg. Don't worry, I will be yelling my **** off for you to get over the Crows. If Gibbs walks, I think he will be headed in the direction of Alberton. The Crows are done.
 
Just proves that a coach is only as good as his list allows him. Your list at the moment is shithouse, maybe the worse in the league. Murphy, although a good player, is NOT a leader...he couldn't lead the Titanic into an iceberg. Don't worry, I will be yelling my **** off for you to get over the Crows. If Gibbs walks, I think he will be headed in the direction of Alberton. The Crows are done.

Gibbs should leave yes, because even though we will offer him $500k he will want more and I seriously doubt he will go to Adelaide or Port. He will go to a club like Lions or Suns.. we might be able to package up a deal to GWS for a young key forward who knows.
 
Richmond and Brisbane supporters should be thanking us big time - all the media focus will be on us this week and rightly so. ;)
We were so bad today it wasn't funny.
So many issues I don't even know where to start.

But, I agree with what Gus Poyet said - we have to keep Mick at the club as he will make the tough decisions at years end.
A small but significant point to this is that Waite and Garlett were dropped for the game.
Can't wait to see what happens at the selection table this week.
 
I just dont see why ruckman are taking in the first or second rounds even. Let alone with #1 pick. If they re-did that draft Kreuzer would be lucky to go top 20.

Kreuzer was outstanding at junior level. Every other team in the league would probably have taken him at #1.

It's hardly his fault he's been struck down by multiple injuries along the way. There's a shitload of luck involved in football and thoughout players career.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Carlton’s soul exorcised, I am disappointed

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top