- Thread starter
- #51
Even cherry picking like this doesn't give you the result you are after. The Bulldogs game was an exceptionally rare outlier for winning a game with a stacked injury list. It followed 3 winnable (for a side with 4 or less injuries instead of 7-8) games where we had as many injuries and played like a VFL side.Nope I don't. A factor yes. But not that massive. Because we had bad losses when the injury list was not massive (Gold Coast, Fremantle, St.Kilda come to mind instantly), and we had good wins with more injuries (first Dogs game).
What I do think is that it's become a very convenient catch all for the inevitable decline of a lot of players. We don't want to admit some stars are just players now, so it's easier to pin it on injuries.
Gold Coast and St Kilda games were away from home with 5 (Rohan managed/sub) and 4 pre game injuries, then 1 and 2 in game injuries. Therefore 6 missing/injured in total.
Therefore Fremantle is your main example and again is an outlier. Everyone agrees that game was a shocker for that reason.
That's the whole reason I ran the stats. To assess if there was a strong correlation between losing and having 6 or more players injured, and to see if this situation happened an abnormally large amount. It was an emphatic yes in both cases.