Unofficial Preview Changes for next week vs @Freo

Remove this Banner Ad

out: xerri (inj), scott and bergman
in: Goldy, Phillips and Corr

B: Bonar Logue McDonald
HB: Goater Corr Sheezel
C: Shiels Simpkin Powell
HF: Sleevo Comben Taylor
F: Zurhaar Larkey Curtis
R: Goldy Phillips LDU
I: Turner Cunners Ziebell Greenwood
Sub: Bergman

Jackson - Ziebell
Treacy/Amiss - Corr
Fyfe - Bonar
Taberner - Logue

next week mckay in for ziebell, the following week TT in for greenwood

bergman stiff but a small defender to go out for corr
Why are you replacing two outside runners with a backman and an inside mid?

Do you even football?
 
Where did Powell usually start centre bounces?
You mean in relation to Comben? Behind or to his right. Simpkin usually started behind Chom.
Only issue with this is how easily Powell and Phillips were pushed around by mature Dogs mids during that practise game. Jy's becoming a solid, hard player now, maybe an extra 10% so 69% and 28% for powell would work and not leave us to get smashed around the contest.
Yeah that sounds good.

Is 18% CBA an issue? Powell was everywhere while we were on top.
Not at all, and I do like your general observations about Powelly.

The issue I'm thinking about is how we can maximise our strengths around the centre while also defending against Taberner, Jackson, Fyfe and one of Amiss/Treacy.

Fyfe does not appear like much of a threat anymore as a forward. At least if the last game and preseason is any indication. We can just tell JZ punch it everytime it heads in his direction and give Nat all the grief he can muster.

But Bonar and Logue leaves us one tall short for the other three.
 
Last edited:
IN: Hall Dawson Corr Goldstein
OUT: Taylor Xerri Bonar Turner

B: Hall Dawson Corr
HB: McDonald Logue Sheezel
C: Scott Davies-Uniacke Bergman
HF: Simpkin Comben Stephenson
F: Curtis Larkey Zurhaar
R: Goldstein Cunnington Powell
I: Phillips Greenwood Ziebell Goater
S: Shiels
E: Tucker Turner Bonar
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You mean in relation to Comben? Behind or to his right. Simpkin usually started behind Chom.

Yeah that sounds good.


Not at all, and I do like your general observations about Powelly.

The issue I'm thinking about is how we can maximise our strengths around the centre while also defending against Taberner, Jackson, Fyfe and one of Amiss/Treacy.

Fyfe does not appear like much of a threat anymore as a forward. At least if the last game and preseason is any indication. We can just tell JZ punch it everytime it heads in his direction and give Nat all the grief he can muster.

But Bonner and Logue leaves us one tall short for the other three.
All this talk (both on here and in the media) of the Fyfe forward experiment failing just makes me more certain he'll kick 3+ against us this week. He's awesome above his head. Will cause us a ton of strife if Longmuir leaves him in, which he will going by what Freo fans are saying.

But yeah, all that is fair enough. They'll go in tall and Corr is a must. I'd actually bring in Dawson too, but that'd likely mean dropping one of JZ and Bonar, and all indications are that that won't be the case. Can tell this season that we're gonna struggle against land of the giants teams
 
playing our captain and back to back syd barker medallist and proven elite centre square mid is going to cost the team

just ******* lol. you're an absolute goose mate

and for the record i love Powelly and WilPhil and have said so many times, and I hope Wardlaw is a gun, but all of them have a very ******* long way to go until they're fit to tie Jyza's bootlaces let alone relegate him from a position where he has won back to back Syds

Pretty aggressive response to a valid point.....

Dont want to undersell Jy's achievement, but BF in a bottom team is vastly different from BF in a premiership winning team.

coupled with Clarksons well publicised philosophy of being a duel position player, it will be sooner than later where he will be pushed out of that midfield.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Goldie for X is the only certainty.

I agree we need to get Corr in, but who he replaces is not clear. Bonar played well enough and appears to be in Clarko's long-term plans.

Is Round 2 too early to manage Shiels? Especially given Perth trip? Unlikely, and he definitely showed his worth.

I'd drop CT. Unforgivable miss at the end.
 
You mean in relation to Comben? Behind or to his right. Simpkin usually started behind Chom.

Yeah that sounds good.


Not at all, and I do like your general observations about Powelly.

The issue I'm thinking about is how we can maximise our strengths around the centre while also defending against Taberner, Jackson, Fyfe and one of Amiss/Treacy.

Fyfe does not appear like much of a threat anymore as a forward. At least if the last game and preseason is any indication. We can just tell JZ punch it everytime it heads in his direction and give Nat all the grief he can muster.

But Bonar and Logue leaves us one tall short for the other three.
Knowing Norths luck they will rotate him through the mid field and he will hurt us badly...
 
Goldie for X is the only certainty.

I agree we need to get Corr in, but who he replaces is not clear. Bonar played well enough and appears to be in Clarko's long-term plans.

Is Round 2 too early to manage Shiels? Especially given Perth trip? Unlikely, and he definitely showed his worth.

I'd drop CT. Unforgivable miss at the end.

We need Shiels leadership and experience especially in a hostile environment interstate.
 
Minimum should be Out: Taylor, Zerri
In: Goldy, Corr

Would like to bring in either Hall or Dawson but not sure who should be replaced...Bonar, Turner, Stevo and Shiel all did enough to keep their spots as did Zeibell...
 
Pretty aggressive response to a valid point.....

Dont want to undersell Jy's achievement, but BF in a bottom team is vastly different from BF in a premiership winning team.

coupled with Clarksons well publicised philosophy of being a duel position player, it will be sooner than later where he will be pushed out of that midfield.
It's not a valid point. Its typical sphynx hyperbolic nonsense
 
I'd drop CT. Unforgivable miss at the end.

It's a good problem to have that there isn't an obvious drop due to form.

I suspect CT is safe this week because he demostrated some good forward pressure and physicality, and we know that Clarko rates that highly. (Same reason Kayne Turner won't be dropped).

If someone's getting dropped, my guess is it'll be one of Bergman, Goater, or Scott. All three of those guys played a decent game against the Eagles, so they'd be a bit stiff. But it just comes down to matchups.
 
Goldie for X is the only certainty.

I agree we need to get Corr in, but who he replaces is not clear. Bonar played well enough and appears to be in Clarko's long-term plans.

Is Round 2 too early to manage Shiels? Especially given Perth trip? Unlikely, and he definitely showed his worth.

I'd drop CT. Unforgivable miss at the end.

CT and Stepho are the obvious outs.

CT couldn't hit a target in the first half when we were flying.

His first quarter I think he missed each of his first 3-4 kicks by about 5m.

If we know anything about Clarkson, he also values quality ball use above most things also.
 
As we head into enemy territory to face one of the stingiest defences in the AFL, I think we'll get a great indication of how high-powered this gameplan from Clarkson is going to be.

Just because of who we're facing and where the game is, it'll probably be one of our lowest scoring games for the year. Whatever we end up scoring this weekend can almost be considered our base output so to speak.

David Noble averaged 36 points in his two games at Optus against the Dockers. I'd be hoping for at least 60 and anything above that would show tremendous improvement and belief that we can kick a winning score against anyone.

On the other side of the ball, I think Fremantle showed against the Saints that even with a new look forward line with Jackson and Fyfe added to the mix, they still aren't going to be a high scoring side. If Fyfe doesn't get back to his best, then there's nobody up forward for the Dockers who scares you. West Coast at least had Ryan, and perhaps even Darling or Allen are more dangerous right now than Taberner, Treacy, and Jackson. It's not going to be a shootout, so if we're able to score on them then we'll give ourselves a great chance.

My prediction is Fremantle 85 - North Melbourne 60.
 
As we head into enemy territory to face one of the stingiest defences in the AFL, I think we'll get a great indication of how high-powered this gameplan from Clarkson is going to be.

Just because of who we're facing and where the game is, it'll probably be one of our lowest scoring games for the year. Whatever we end up scoring this weekend can almost be considered our base output so to speak.

David Noble averaged 36 points in his two games at Optus against the Dockers. I'd be hoping for at least 60 and anything above that would show tremendous improvement and belief that we can kick a winning score against anyone.

On the other side of the ball, I think Fremantle showed against the Saints that even with a new look forward line with Jackson and Fyfe added to the mix, they still aren't going to be a high scoring side. If Fyfe doesn't get back to his best, then there's nobody up forward for the Dockers who scares you. West Coast at least had Ryan, and perhaps even Darling or Allen are more dangerous right now than Taberner, Treacy, and Jackson. It's not going to be a shootout, so if we're able to score on them then we'll give ourselves a great chance.

My prediction is Fremantle 85 - North Melbourne 60.

We have a few things stacked against us, despite Fremantle playing Sunday arvo in Melbourne, we played in 37 degrees.

Saturday's forecast in Perth is for 29 and sunny and there's no roof to protect us and the ground is much bigger, we aren't the fittest side in the league yet and the ground size wont suit that game plan as much as it did on Saturday.


Hoping for a good showing, but expecting us to run out of legs in the second half, as we appeared to on the weekend.

1679356566281.png
 
I'd like to see Bonar get a decent block of games to see if he's up to it or not so we can make a call on his future. Otherwise how are we gonna find out if he can be the next Gibson.

Agree. Clarko may well keep Bonar in. Maybe, Corr doesn’t come in. Clarko knows best, obviously. My view is that, if Corr comes in, it shouldn’t be at the expense of Miller.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
My biggest concern is their mids. Those smaller zippy mid groups, that handball around and out of congestion are generally what kills us. It’s why Essendon/Dogs midfield always have a day out against us. They make us look slow & generally we get sucked in and they burn us when the ball is released.

Need to win clearances and contested ball.

Jy or Shiels to run with Brayshaw.

Clarkson will have a plan to mitigate Pearce/Cox (we won’t be able to completely) intercepting everything.

Time will tell. However, we looked far zippier ourselves in the middle on Saturday. I’m hoping we’re a completely different proposition than in the past. Maybe, WC made us look better than we really are? We’ll certainly find out at the weekend.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Unofficial Preview Changes for next week vs @Freo

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top