Gone Critical
Moderator
- Moderator
- #101
Its never a win when something works out well for Carlton
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know if IP gets shared among players going to different clubs, clubs generally know how other clubs play.How much IP would Markov have picked up over 4 weeks that he can take with him?
Its never a win when something works out well for Carlton
Very quick.Hey everyone - I come in peace.
Question for my fellow track watchers:
How was Markov looking in the pre-season? Did he look out of place in comparison to your other HBFs (N. Daicos, IQ, Noble etc.)? I'm wondering if he'll be a VFL player/emergency AFL depth or if we think he could fill a role in the seniors early for us.
Cheers.
Just about every player looks out of place compared to Nick .Hey everyone - I come in peace.
Question for my fellow track watchers:
How was Markov looking in the pre-season? Did he look out of place in comparison to your other HBFs (N. Daicos, IQ, Noble etc.)? I'm wondering if he'll be a VFL player/emergency AFL depth or if we think he could fill a role in the seniors early for us.
Cheers.
Its never a win when something works out well for Carlton
He was looking better than N. Daicos and IQ, but not as good as Johnny F***ing Noble.Hey everyone - I come in peace.
Question for my fellow track watchers:
How was Markov looking in the pre-season? Did he look out of place in comparison to your other HBFs (N. Daicos, IQ, Noble etc.)? I'm wondering if he'll be a VFL player/emergency AFL depth or if we think he could fill a role in the seniors early for us.
Cheers.
Hey everyone - I come in peace.
Question for my fellow track watchers:
How was Markov looking in the pre-season? Did he look out of place in comparison to your other HBFs (N. Daicos, IQ, Noble etc.)? I'm wondering if he'll be a VFL player/emergency AFL depth or if we think he could fill a role in the seniors early for us.
Cheers.
Surely there would by NDA. But I would hope most clubs would be in the know of how their opposition plays.I don't know if IP gets shared among players going to different clubs, clubs generally know how other clubs play.
I'm more concerned that we're signing another rookie ruck and dusting our hands going "ruck depth issue solved."
The players can say whatever they like.Surely there would by NDA. But I would hope most clubs would be in the know of how their opposition plays.
Markov: Collingwood will play an attacking, fast game of footy with run and carry out of defence. WHE is moving to defence, Nick Daicos will have more midfield minutes. And they've signed a secret weapon by the name of Oscar Steene.
Carlton: This is what we needed to know in R23.
I agree about the rookie ruck situation. Cox has a few years left max (guy didn't start playing until 24 so his body will wear down differently to kids who have played for years) and Cameron is getting older. If they go down, it means that Frampton, McStay or someone else is going to have to step up which is less than ideal. I suppose we do have the mid-season draft but it doesn't seem very proactive when we could just sign a TALL forward-ruck from the state leagues and solve TWO problems. Ruck depth and forward.
If I’m an aspiring AFL ruckman, I’m not going to Collingwood to play behind Cameron and Cox. No guarantee the team will even include two ruckmen most weeks, given they have McStay and Kreuger potentially helping out for 15% game time.Surely there would by NDA. But I would hope most clubs would be in the know of how their opposition plays.
Markov: Collingwood will play an attacking, fast game of footy with run and carry out of defence. WHE is moving to defence, Nick Daicos will have more midfield minutes. And they've signed a secret weapon by the name of Oscar Steene.
Carlton: This is what we needed to know in R23.
I agree about the rookie ruck situation. Cox has a few years left max (guy didn't start playing until 24 so his body will wear down differently to kids who have played for years) and Cameron is getting older. If they go down, it means that Frampton, McStay or someone else is going to have to step up which is less than ideal. I suppose we do have the mid-season draft but it doesn't seem very proactive when we could just sign a TALL forward-ruck from the state leagues and solve TWO problems. Ruck depth and forward.
Ooh that didn't age well, perhaps don't laugh til you know who the joke really is.How is Steene almost certain if they've only just invited Markov and he doesn't start until Monday?
The injury to Cameron probably helped in the decision, but if it had of been Murphy or Howe getting injured, it may have tipped the scales in the favour of Markov. Back when Markov first started training it was probably an even money bet.Ooh that didn't age well, perhaps don't laugh til you know who the joke really is.
Yeah probably started even, but as of last week, Steene was just ahead given how impressive his summer has been, and a list need. Then cameron's injury scare prob came a reminder in our ruck stocks.The injury to Cameron probably helped in the decision, but if it had of been Murphy or Howe getting injured, it may have tipped the scales in the favour of Markov. Back when Markov first started training it was probably an even money bet.
we needed a ruckman to replace Grundy's spot on the list so he probably started ahead.Yeah probably started even, but as of last week, Steene was just ahead given how impressive his summer has been, and a list need. Then cameron's injury scare prob came a reminder in our ruck stocks.
Yeah, post trade period its the thing that wright mentioned, if we didn't get a ruck in the draft; we'd train someone over summer.we needed a ruckman to replace Grundy's spot on the list so he probably started ahead.
Reading comprehension not your strong suit Dudebro? I didn't say Steene wouldn't get the gig, I pointed out that he can't have been a certainty if they were still inviting Markov to train.Ooh that didn't age well, perhaps don't laugh til you know who the joke really is.
We want extra run off halfback, which Markov would have provided. It also explains the move of WHE to that position.Yeah, post trade period its the thing that wright mentioned, if we didn't get a ruck in the draft; we'd train someone over summer.
And that's exactly what happened.
Markov's inclusion just threw a spanner in the works that didn't quite make sense.
You know what I mean. Given they always were looking to the future with Oscar. If they wanted a mature ruck could have found one to invite down
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Bwahahahaaaa you were so cocky and look like a fool nowReading comprehension not your strong suit Dudebro? I didn't say Steene wouldn't get the gig, I pointed out that he can't have been a certainty if they were still inviting Markov to train.
They only signed Steene today.
My word, you've opened with a bang haven't ya?Bwahahahaaaa you were so cocky and look like a fool now
Almost seems like the account was made specifically for it.My word, you've opened with a bang haven't ya?
So your concerned with our ruck issues, but upset we’ve taken a punt on a kid as a rookie ruck to start trying to address it? I mean, it’s a start atleast.I don't know if IP gets shared among players going to different clubs, clubs generally know how other clubs play.
I'm more concerned that we're signing another rookie ruck and dusting our hands going "ruck depth issue solved."
Seriously? Between Moore, Noble, IQ, Maynard, Daicos and even Howe, I’m pretty sure we have run off half back well and truly covered. Markov would have been depth, nothing more. I’m sure his run off half back in the VFL would have been thrilling, but personally I’m happy to have a genuine ruckman developing now rather than an undersized ruck/forward taking the main role in the twos most weeks.We want extra run off halfback, which Markov would have provided. It also explains the move of WHE to that position.