Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
No it is costing 2 first round picks and Noble no matter how you try and sell itIf we are trading Noble for pick 12 And trade future 1st and 12 for Houston, then it s actually costng us Noble and future 1st. We never had 12.
YesIf McGuane gets a bid in Rnd 1 next year and we match with multiple later picks. That counts as us taking a first round pick doesn’t it?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
One of the factors with the change of Dvi is that your picks won't drop as far if you go into deficit. Clubs will find it harder to match and will be more willing to go into deficitThink the biggest question surrounding our F1 is, do Collingwood think mcguane will improve to the point where he is likely to attract a first round bid.
You might want to think about it a bit more.No it is costing 2 first round picks and Noble no matter how you try and sell it
Wonder how hard it will be for Collingwood to match a first round bid with only second and third round picks under the new system next year.He's already in first round calculations according to twomey
Imagine another year in the system where he gets to
Tough ask.You might want to think about it a bit more.
YesIf McGuane gets a bid in Rnd 1 next year and we match with multiple later picks. That counts as us taking a first round pick doesn’t it?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I think you need to do more research on Young.Nick Haynes joining the Blues & SDK will end up at the Blues next year.
I’m keen on Lewis Young for a cheap KPD. We will likely lose Howe, and Eyre, Frampton & Dean are likely on their last contract if they’re not great next year.
I guess we could have opted not to bring any free agents in and just go backwards next year.
It would be extremely poor form from a club to chase a player, make them a lucrative offer and then rescind said offer. They’ve made a commitment by offering him a deal, no way they turn around now and say “nah actually we’re getting this guy that just got delisted instead”.If Port are looking for a small forward they should divert from Richards to Ned McHenry. DFA now so no trade needed. Already in SA, has a lot more exposed form than Richards and same age.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I think all the worry about making sure we have the points for Mcguane next year is unnecessary. Correct me if I'm wrong but there has never an instance where a team had to pass on a F/S or academy player because they couldn't come up with points. There will always be mechanisms to get them, we don't need to be pulling levers this year based on guestimates for next yearThink the biggest question surrounding our F1 is, do Collingwood think mcguane will improve to the point where he is likely to attract a first round bid.
He’s already regarded as a first round prospect, his improvement from here will simply make him a top 5-10 prospect.Think the biggest question surrounding our F1 is, do Collingwood think mcguane will improve to the point where he is likely to attract a first round bid.
Hi Seedsfan. It certainly looks that way on face value, but it may becmome clearer if you consider this.No it is costing 2 first round picks and Noble no matter how you try and sell it
That is what it costs as you have to factor the price paid to acquire the picks we tradedYou might want to think about it a bit more.
If noble is being traded for one of those first rounders in the first place then it’s basically Noble and a first for Houston.No it is costing 2 first round picks and Noble no matter how you try and sell it
That’s the only circumstance the F1 and Noble for 12 works. I still wouldn’t do it, but you can at least justify it because it would take 2 1sts to get Houston if we had both.How are we getting pick 12 in that scenario?
I think we'd do deals that turn Noble, Richards and a future first into Houston and be very happy if it was possible.
And it still costs two first round picks and Noble no matter how you try and sell itHi Seedsfan. It certainly looks that way on face value, but it may becmome clearer if you consider this.
Collingwood holds Noble and future 1st.
We trade Noble for 12.
We trade 12 and future 1st for Houston.
End result-:
Collingwood now has Houston.
Collingwood no longer has Noble and future 1st
Lewis Young haha..Nick Haynes joining the Blues & SDK will end up at the Blues next year.
I’m keen on Lewis Young for a cheap KPD. We will likely lose Howe, and Eyre, Frampton & Dean are likely on their last contract if they’re not great next year.
But clubs usually plan for their F/s bids a year in advance. So they will try to execute as many trades as they can in prior trade period to get the necessary points banked up, so that they are not exploited by teams during the required draft year.I think all the worry about making sure we have the points for Mcguane next year is unnecessary. Correct me if I'm wrong but there has never an instance where a team had to pass on a F/S or academy player because they couldn't come up with points. There will always be mechanisms to get them, we don't need to be pulling levers this year based on guestimates for next year
Are you gonna sulk about McGuanes bid next year swallowing our first if we still have it then? We still don't get to use it.And it still costs two first round picks and Noble no matter how you try and sell it
Yes I posted yesterday that if we get pick 12 (now 13) Carlton will panic and cough up this and next years firsts.Does anyone else have the gut feeling that Carlton will cave and pay through their nose just to ensure that he doesn't land at Collingwood?
I dont get why people worry about a kid we are guaranteed to get, pretty sure we can even do trades after he is bid onI couldn't give a rats tossbag about where McGuane will attract a bid. If there's a way to get Houston, we get him.