He’s of the view that picks in the late teens net you nick daicos every timeThis is all it’s about. For whatever reason Seedy doesn’t want Houston.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He’s of the view that picks in the late teens net you nick daicos every timeThis is all it’s about. For whatever reason Seedy doesn’t want Houston.
Agreed. IMO, they’re all long shots aside from Tomlinson whose main issue is being the wrong side of 30. I don’t hold out hope for either of Eyre or Dean so I’d cop turning them over if the club chooses that path.If we're going to carry a developing tall from the 2020 draft like Dean/Eyre or even Reef, I'd rather give the opportunity to a player that was a pick 6 and hopefully has more upside and talent. Would happily delist Eyre and Reef and pick up DGB to develop and Tomlinson for immediate depth
Every time we have traded a future first we have done worse the following year than expected.
No way when we got Treloar in did we expect to miss finals again. We finished 12th then 12th
Beams we went from 2nd to 3rd.
2020 we went from 6th to 17th after trading our future first.
2023 we went from 1st to 9th
There's no way that's just a coincidence. I reckon the players love future firsts and stop trying if we trade them. That 2nd to 3rd was a particularly dire example of a plummet.
Heritier De Man?Exactly, that’s what all the players play for. To see the next 17-18 year old kid enter the club. Pendles would gladly trade his premierships if it meant he got to see more teenagers at the club before he retired.
Honest I bet a bunch of the draft crowd can’t even spell HDM’s full name.
It’s not a conspiracy it is what has happened every time we have traded out our future first. It’s why we should be cautiousI love a good conspiracy theory as much as anyone but I honestly reckon that’s just a whole bunch of coincidences more so than a pattern defined by trading the first round pick.
Trading our first pick for Schultz wasn’t the reason Mitchell, McStay, Elliott, De Goey, Pendlebury and Cox missed massive chunks of the season
Trading our first pick wasn’t the reason the umpires repeatedly screwed us over late in games to cost us wins
Trading our first pick wasn’t the reason Fly inexplicably decided to bring Richards on with 47 seconds left in the Sydney game
Trading our first pick wasn’t the reason we were sluggish off the shortest pre-season in history and hungover from a Premiership
hed be advising them in the backgroundWright will step in as CEO at the end of next year, right? So he has nothing to with Houston at all.
Exactly, that’s what all the players play for. To see the next 17-18 year old kid enter the club. Pendles would gladly trade his premierships if it meant he got to see more teenagers at the club before he retired.
Cautious doesn't mean not doing it.It’s not a conspiracy it is what has happened every time we have traded out our future first. It’s why we should be cautious
The last 4 times I tossed a coin I got tails. Conclusion: it's impossible to get heads. I will never toss a coin again.Every time we have traded a future first we have done worse the following year than expected.
No way when we got Treloar in did we expect to miss finals again. We finished 12th then 12th
Beams we went from 2nd to 3rd.
2020 we went from 6th to 17th after trading our future first.
2023 we went from 1st to 9th
Now we're talking.The real twist is that the one that hurt the most on field hurt the least off field. Future 1st for Owies manicpie
Trading future firsts isn't the problem if its for stars. Trading future firsts for average return is bad.It’s not a conspiracy it is what has happened every time we have traded out our future first. It’s why we should be cautious
Are you superstitious?
It shows that you have to be careful. We have had our share of bad luck.There's no way that's just a coincidence. I reckon the players love future firsts and stop trying if we trade them. That 2nd to 3rd was a particularly dire example of a plummet.
OCDAre you superstitious?
All I am saying is if Richmond is getting 6 and 23 for Rioli we should not be rolling over and giving up our future first and Noble for 13 and 29. That’s a horrid deal by comparison. Their respective worth is not that far apartCautious doesn't mean not doing it.
The pile on for posters not advocating the Houston trade is a laugh. It's a different train of thought and either way is a risk. Risk drafting a player that doesnt come on or development time wastes our preimership window? Risk getting Dan at the expense of a future star or Dan's form / injury is a bust?
Wouldn't pay much attention to this bloke. Says Carlton needs more midfielders, when their defence nearly cost them a finals berth this year.Collingwood: Need players all over.
“They need players in all different parts of the ground. They have an ageing list and there is some discussion around that the might fall off the cliff. I think they need some young, quality players.”
Snap judgments: The area each AFL club needs to address this trade period and off-season
Mark Bickley's blink analysis.www.sen.com.au
Given the absolute lottery nature of the draft versus trading for a known commodity, this comment is legitimately hilarious.It’s like a problem gambler saying this time I’ll win
While your point is generally valid, how much of a risk is Houston really?The pile on for posters not advocating the Houston trade is a laugh. It's a different train of thought and either way is a risk. Risk drafting a player that doesnt come on or development time wastes our preimership window? Risk getting Dan at the expense of a future star or Dan's form / injury is a bust?