List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dunno if it's been said anywhere that Freo would take Baker for 11 independently of the Bolton deal?

It's a different pot calling the kettle of fish black if it helps get Bolton over to their club. I'm sure Dockers fans would be melting at the prospect of adding Baker for that pick alone without Bolton being part of the discussion too. Happy to be corrected here though.
 
If Freo have offered pick 10,11 and 18 for Bolton and Baker then the only reason Richmond haven't accepted it is because we are working something out to get Baker.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So why do you ignore that we can get flankers with picks outside the first round? And all the major phantom drafts, why do none of them have flankers in the top10? You're being different for the sake of being different. Sort of what fearthers do. It's why I asked the question.
What pick did Lockie Whitfield go?

Luke Hodge?

I see Travagalia as that exact type of player.

And he will only cost a pick around 7 to 10.

My perfect draft is we get Travalgalia AND a Lindsay or if we do land another top 10 pick a sliding mid like Langford or Smillie. Lindsay at 10/11 would be just as good.

This draft is very hard to judge. The best mid may well just get taken after pick 10.

You call this being different for the sake of it. Well just focusing on using our lowest pick on a mid is simplistic without understanding the depth of this draft. And disregarding what the modern game has become or what our list needs are.
I actually agree with Obeanie1 I think Travagalia may well end up being one of the top 3 in the draft.
 

AFL legend Paul Roos says Hawthorn is playing a dangerous game with its negotiations on a trade for West Coast's Tom Barrass.

The two teams' discussions had been centered around Hawthorn's first-rounder (currently pick 14), before the Hawks stunned the league by trading that pick to Carlton on Friday.

Reports around the trade suggested Hawthorn had grown tired of negotiations with the Eagles.

"This is a slap in the face from Hawthorn. They're going, 'F you, we're going to get him anyway'," Roos told the ABC AFL Daily podcast.

[PLAYERCARD]Tom Barrass[/PLAYERCARD]'s potential move to Hawthorn appears to be in jeopardy at this stage.
Tom Barrass's potential move to Hawthorn appears to be in jeopardy at this stage.(Getty Images)
"If Hawthorn misses out on Barrass it's a bonehead decision, an absolute bonehead decision.

"It stains them with the managers. This is what people don't understand. If Hawthorn don't do the deal for Barrass, let me tell you, the next time a Hawthorn person rings up (to discuss) a player who's contracted, let me tell you what the discussion is going to be: 'Not interested'.

"Some clubs are really easy to deal with, and the managers know that. The managers dictate when players will go and where they go.

"This is a stain on the Hawthorn Football Club if the Barrass deal doesn't get done by Wednesday."

Paul Roos goes whack on Hawthorn's approach. Tapping up a contracted player all year and then decides to trade away the draft pick that would certainly be involved in getting him over.
 
Is the Tassie team likely to have this arrangement, at least temporarily?
They can't claim to not be a traditionally AFL state.

Not yet, but it will be coming.

Tasmania currently falls under North Melbourne's NGA - hence why there are moves to swap them out for access to Darwin now that Gold Coast have been scaled back from having access there.

Once the alignment occurs between the Devils and the VFL, prior to the initiation of the team in AFL, the Tasmanian NGA zone will be set for them.
 
The change to NGA matching was announced back in July:
‘Excitement machine’: AFL’s biggest winners of NGA change... and unlucky losers of years past


The complaints from St Kilda had a different, and far more shameless motive however.

St Kilda president A.Bassett aired his public complaints about drafting during their awards night on 30th September:
‘Sick and tired’: Saints boss slams AFL draft system over premiers’ access to prodigy as departing star snubbed

St Kilda then receive pick 8 compensation for J.Battle on 4th October:
Updated Hawks win the Battle: Compo pick confirmed as Saint completes move


But it's not compromised... Just complicated of course.
When are they gonna stop teams from trading away picks so they can bundle a bunch of low picks?
How long has that even been in place?
 



Paul Roos goes whack on Hawthorn's approach. Tapping up a contracted player all year and then decides to trade away the draft pick that would certainly be involved in getting him over.

Great to read.

Some sense coming out of the Vic media finally. It's just a shame so many nuffie journos just chase clicks with silly headlines.

No surprise. Roos knows how the system works.

Over to you Hawks. ;) :thumbsu:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If Freo have offered pick 10,11 and 18 for Bolton and Baker then the only reason Richmond haven't accepted it is because we are working something out to get Baker.

Freo might have tabled those picks but we haven't heard what they have requested to come back the other way with those players. My guess is it's not as juicy an offer as it sounds given we're only hearing half of it.
 
Freo might have tabled those picks but we haven't heard what they have requested to come back the other way with those players. My guess is it's not as juicy an offer as it sounds given we're only hearing half of it.
Great point. Frankly, if they want to pay 3 R1 for those two, then Richmond is best off accepting them. Realistically, I can't see Feathers ever wanting to overpay for anything.
 
Great point. Frankly, if they want to pay 3 R1 for those two, then Richmond is best off accepting them. Realistically, I can't see Feathers ever wanting to overpay for anything.

If the deal was as straightforward as that I reckon Tigers would be on media street saying we have an in principle agreement with Fremantle subject to West Coast matching or exceeding the offer to split Baker out of the deal. It's too good to be true and not the way Freo have operated in the recent past.

Has got the hallmarks of us offering our F1 for Curtin last year despite noone reporting that we had asked for a F2 back.
 
I might be in the minority, but I would love Parish at the Eagles. Parish and a Future 1st for Pick 3 would definitely help. Parish is definitely the sort of player that would be a perfect fit next to Harley.
I agree that Parish would be perfect for our midfield but he's like Baker in that I wouldn't want to spend any serious capital on him. 3 for 9 + Parish would be much more palatable than 3 for 6/8 + Baker though.
 
Great point. Frankly, if they want to pay 3 R1 for those two, then Richmond is best off accepting them. Realistically, I can't see Feathers ever wanting to overpay for anything.
Sure seems like the real story is that you can't trade players against their will and obviously Baker is much more keen to come to us than Freo. I'm sure Richmond are the main ones pushing the Freo option.

On a related note, Gettable just reported we're focused on getting the Baker deal done first with some other way of getting it done. No specific talk of pick 3 in that.
 
Gettable.

Eagles preference was future picks rather than 14 from the Hawk. Want F1 and F2 for TB but Hawks want F3 back which Eagles aint prepared to do atm. Imo clearly didn’t want to hand pick 14 straight over for Baker.

Eagles want to get into the bidding for pick 13 but need to get the TB trade done first and needs to be down soon and Roos closing in on 13.

Hawks F1 + Our F2 would have to go close?

Not sure how the Baker deal happens. Would have to be pick 3 involved if it has nothing to do with the TB trade
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top