List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
After all the academy & f/s matches, how much further will it fall?
That’s after that.

It’s currently 26.
26-Ashcroft
27-Lombard
28-Kako
29- Marshall
now at 30.

Other FS and academy’s that are unlikely to come before that
Welsh
Camporeale x2
Champion
And I think Giants have an NGA ruck expected around the mid 30s too
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So you wouldnt want Reid , #3 , Bolton , Warner , Hewitt & Allan combination of midfield
you rather #14 than Bolton

Crazy
Id rather my idea where the Eagles end up with 6+9+13+23 with Baker and Graham before draft complexities than making Bolton happen.
We also need bulk early picks, its not just you guys.
We would still have our F1+HawksF1 to chase Warner next year
 
Id rather my idea where the Eagles end up with 6+9+13+23 with Baker and Graham before draft complexities than making Bolton happen.
We also need bulk early picks, its not just you guys.
We would still have our F1+HawksF1 to chase Warner next year
Nah not enough in it for Richmond and rather stick with out picks and take 14 got baker and trade for 2 with north
 
Phil and Bondy after one day:

The Muppet Show Muppets GIF by Muppet Wiki
 
Nah not enough in it for Richmond and rather stick with out picks and take 14 got baker and trade for 2 with north
I literally have you guys getting the rough equivalent of pick 12 of value for free.
Eagles get pick 9 but get stuck with the huge Graham contract.

Wtf do you mean not enough for Richmond?
Thats about as fair as I could make it, if anything Richmond gets the better deal here lmao
 
Does anyone know who at the V/AFL makes the decision regarding compensation picks.

Well the decision is made by a Committee of Three, to ensure the pick is determined both with equity in mind and by consensus.

It should be noted that The AFL Commission went out of their way to ensure that the makeup of the Committee was a balanced representative group, with the selection panel factoring in: gender, race and socio economic factors, when they appointed the Committee members.

Here is the vision of the three committee members on their way to AFL House earlier today to consider the appropriate compensation.


andrewisindie-drunk.gif yes-love.gif 200-1.gif
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Saints trade if they want a ‘top’ mid.

3 + 14
For
7 + 8?
I suggested it on the Saints board earlier today and they were all keen.

They really want a mid and a KPP of some sort I believe, and it would secure us Travaglia plus hopefully one of the mids that slides if Tauru or something jumps up the rankings
 
Nah not enough in it for Richmond and rather stick with out picks and take 14 got baker and trade for 2 with north
If you don't think there's enough in it for Richmond we can send an uncontracted Baker to the PSD if they want to be unreasonable and demand overs for him.

I think the option where you end up with another top 5 pick out of thin air is better for all parties involved rather than trying to have your cake and eat it too and outright win every trade you're involved in.
 
Pretty sure the afl would step in and prevent us from rigging the system by overpaying graham to get baker for cheap. Think Essendon and saints were trying to work out something similar involving Shiel last year and there was talk the afl wouldn’t let that happen.

Also really seems like the compo has not been adjusted to reflect the cba increase so obviously there is an increase in higher paid players = more 1st round compo


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Well the decision is made up of a Committee of Three, to ensure the pick is determined both with equity in mind and by consensus.

It should be noted that The AFL Commission went out of their way to ensure that the makeup of the Committee was a balanced representative group, with the selection panel factoring in: gender, race and socio economic factors, when they appointed the Committee members.

Here is the vision of the three committee members on their way to AFL House earlier today to consider the appropriate compensation.


View attachment 2131695 View attachment 2131693 View attachment 2131688
I recognize Andrew Dillon and Mama Kane, so who is the one in the top left hand
 
The club’s off-field performance so far appears pretty insipid.

It seems we’ve been corralled into dealing with Hawthorn exclusively on Barrass. I don’t recall any statement (from the Geelong playbook) to the effect that, if he wants to get to Melbourne, there are plenty of clubs there and we’re happy to deal with whoever can provide fair value. They’ve been played like guitars by Hawthorn and Barrass so far.

It seems (from the confidence of a few of the credible footy journos) we must’ve conceded we’ll need to hand over pick 13 for Baker (albeit with some other picks possibly exchanged). This heavily dilutes the Barrass compensation and begs the question is there really any point proceeding

And from the deathly silence, it would appear we’re too shy to ask for a priority pick.

FFS guys LIFT!!!

LOL nothing has even happened and you’re melting over speculation.
 
Pretty sure the afl would step in and prevent us from rigging the system by overpaying graham to get baker for cheap. Think Essendon and saints were trying to work out something similar involving Shiel last year and there was talk the afl wouldn’t let that happen.

Also really seems like the compo has not been adjusted to reflect the cba increase so obviously there is an increase in higher paid players = more 1st round compo


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
What if we are just really keen on Graham and he wouldnt move across the country for anything less than 900k per year?

Who are the AFL to say that we dont think hes worth it?
 
I suggested it on the Saints board earlier today and they were all keen.

They really want a mid and a KPP of some sort I believe, and it would secure us Travaglia plus hopefully one of the mids that slides if Tauru or something jumps up the rankings
One of the mids will be there in the open draft, Possibly 2.

1- FOS (Rich)
2- Lalor (North go a tall if they can’t get a split)
3- Jagga (Saints, not sure who they would target)
4- Sid (Adel seems to fit)
5- Reid (Dees could also go Armstrong)
6- Smillie (Rich apparently keen)
7- Langford*
8- Travaglia*
 
Pretty sure the afl would step in and prevent us from rigging the system by overpaying graham to get baker for cheap. Think Essendon and saints were trying to work out something similar involving Shiel last year and there was talk the afl wouldn’t let that happen.

Also really seems like the compo has not been adjusted to reflect the cba increase so obviously there is an increase in higher paid players = more 1st round compo


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Yeah you're right let's not even worry about it and just trade a potential top 10 pick for baker...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top