I honestly do not mind, but we have come this far so i want to see how it works, as a fan you sorta forget the pay scale within the team when you are watching.
Doubt the players think that way especially as this one will be on the public record.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I honestly do not mind, but we have come this far so i want to see how it works, as a fan you sorta forget the pay scale within the team when you are watching.
One of teh things about contracts is that they are flexible and can include options, as long as the AFL know about it, I can't see it a a problem, he's not signing a standard first year or rookie contract. All sports do it, I can't imagine the AFl would be exempt from contract law
Doubt the players think that way especially as this one will be on the public record.
Very true.
The AFL will be very keen to ensure GWS are only priced out on a like for like deal.
For example, if he's given a massive 1-2 year deal by the swans, I think the AFL will make sure the next contract is similar in size, or else it's obvious some of the first contract evens out the second.
There is no problem with front-loading, except it has to done in the one contract available to all teams to consider.
You mean we're not the AFL's love child anymore? How distressingI'm not sure of the actual definition of draft tampering but I imagine it to be pretty broad.
Any form of manipulation to get him past vlads baby giants will bear very close scrutiny
TBH, I think it's just GWS drumming up free publicity, over 4 years, with a developing squad, do they want to be locked into huge deals at this pointWonder if Tippett just puts a 4 year deal on his head, if he is going to gws he is probably stuck there anyway may as well get a nice four year deal
TBH, I think it's just GWS drumming up free publicity, over 4 years, with a developing squad, do they want to be locked into huge deals at this point
Didn't say they did, probably don't mind someone getting more to come across provided they perform, if we land Tippett pressure is on, he needs to be a lot more consistent and dominant
One of teh things about contracts is that they are flexible and can include options, as long as the AFL know about it, I can't see it a a problem, he's not signing a standard first year or rookie contract. All sports do it, I can't imagine the AFl would be exempt from contract law
You nominate money over years in the draft, that's all that has to be met. You can't nominate 3.5 million over 2 years with another 2 year at $200k if draft by the Swans.
He's gone, along with your depth and your Col most likely. Trade period from hell for the Swans and Crows this year.
Oh and feel free to retort with some childish remark about GF. I'd love to hear it.
You nominate money over years in the draft, that's all that has to be met. You can't nominate 3.5 million over 2 years with another 2 year at $200k if drafted by the Swans but just the first 2 if not.
He's gone, along with your depth and your Col most likely. Trade period from hell for the Swans and Crows this year.
Oh and feel free to retort with some childish remark about GF. I'd love to hear it.
Surely GWS can afford him?
I wonder how it will play out from here, assuming Tippett's goal is to price himself out of reach of GWS. I'm guessing this will mean the swans will be paying top dollar if he is successful.
The AFL will be all over plans for a massive first year salary with "an understanding" that Tippett will extend the contract next year at a much lower price.
Oh and feel free to retort with some childish remark about GF. I'd love to hear it.
View attachment 6340
These blokes are gone, we still have a premiership winning list, Tippett or not. You have bunch of over rated flogs who couldn't get past a Canadian rugby player. The COL is not gone and won't be, get used to it, just because a few dim bulbs are resentful doesn't change things for teh AFL. Tippett isn't gone until he's gone. I doubt GWS can committ big money for 4 years, their larger concessions dry up and to retain their young players, they will have to pay overs. Suck up your tears and move on
I think Tippett would be smarter if he put a 1 yr contract and a big salary as he enters the draft. Sends a clear signal to every club that "hey I know I need to obey the rules of the draft but in my heart I want to be at Sydney and I'll be trying to get there in 12 months time if you pick me". That would immediately scare off the GWS/GC who will want a long term player with a long term commitment. Hard to see any others biting and he gets through to the Swans.
While it's not necessarily in the spirit of the draft it is within the rules and will get Tippett want he wants and the same for the Swans.... if they still want him.
You nominate money over years in the draft, that's all that has to be met. You can't nominate 3.5 million over 2 years with another 2 year at $200k if drafted by the Swans but just the first 2 if not.
He's gone, along with your depth and your Col most likely. Trade period from hell for the Swans and Crows this year.
Oh and feel free to retort with some childish remark about GF. I'd love to hear it.
Always happy to comment on your team choking against a team that no one rated aa even a top 4 chanceLike clockwork.
Always happy to comment on your team choking against a team that no one rated aa even a top 4 chance
I think Tippett would be smarter if he put a 1 yr contract and a big salary as he enters the draft. Sends a clear signal to every club that "hey I know I need to obey the rules of the draft but in my heart I want to be at Sydney and I'll be trying to get there in 12 months time if you pick me". That would immediately scare off the GWS/GC who will want a long term player with a long term commitment. Hard to see any others biting and he gets through to the Swans.
While it's not necessarily in the spirit of the draft it is within the rules and will get Tippett want he wants and the same for the Swans.... if they still want him.
Always happy to comment on your team choking against a team that no one rated aa even a top 4 chance
Dont embarass the Hawthorn fans that are doing the hard yards making a genuine effort at finding excuses and attracting sympathy, whilst attempting to drum up support for some AREA 51 style afl conspiracy theories.Guess it beats addressing the actual subject of the thread,which is that you've had a pretty bad trade period having weakened your squad and brought on a review of your massive salary advantage, all for a player your now not getting.