MountPrettyBoy
Senior List
Sur
Sure fooled me..: talks the same way the rest of yas do
*you do
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Sur
Sure fooled me..: talks the same way the rest of yas do
*their
*you do
I just thought if I'm going to see people from low socio-economic areas insult my club, might as well do some good for society and improve their grammar.
But yes, I've seen our boys plenty of times trash talk on the field.
As long as it helps their game and we win, and it doesn't extend beyond the game and/or it isn't racial/homophobic/personal, then "play on".
Whatever helps Ya sleep at night champ...I just thought if I'm going to see people from low socio-economic areas insult my club, might as well do some good for society and improve their grammar.
But yes, I've seen our boys plenty of times trash talk on the field.
As long as it helps their game and we win, and it doesn't extend beyond the game and/or it isn't racial/homophobic/personal, then "play on".
I just thought if I'm going to see people from low socio-economic areas insult my club, might as well do some good for society and improve their grammar.
But yes, I've seen our boys plenty of times trash talk on the field.
As long as it helps their game and we win, and it doesn't extend beyond the game and/or it isn't racial/homophobic/personal, then "play on".
What are the 3 clubs you consider not.. And also do u think that every player that plays for the club lives in that area..?I admit I'm generalising, but there is a 75% chance they're a supporter/player from a club in a low socio-economic area (as there are only 3 clubs I consider not, including us).
See that is your clubs problem thinking your better than everyone else.I admit I'm generalising, but there is a 75% chance they're a supporter/player from a club in a low socio-economic area (as there are only 3 clubs I consider not, including us).
I admit I'm generalising, but there is a 75% chance they're a supporter/player from a club in a low socio-economic area (as there are only 3 clubs I consider not, including us).
you'll probably be here next year anyways mate so don't get ahead of yourself... Much rather own my house in berwick than live in my parents back room in mount waverly like yaself anyday....Yeah it was good to get to travel to nice areas like Black Rock last year.
Definitely a nicer change than to the usual places we have to travel to.
Thanks Ed.
You just paying inadequate players and just making up the numbers.
Got the wrong bloke there.
Now you look like a real toolFair enough. If it's not Ed, I apologise.
I was told it was.
I'll stop with the trash-talking now.
I'll let our footy do the talking instead.
Good luck everyone next week.
Fair enough. If it's not Ed, I apologise.
I was told it was.
I'll stop with the trash-talking now.
I'll let our footy do the talking instead.
Good luck everyone next week.
surely cannizzo can no longer be using the inexperienced excuse any longer, it is quite evident he is out of his league, albeit a very lowly league that he has brought further to its knees. the board will not remove him as he is their puppet. the debacle of the div 3 grand final a couple years back should have been his last judgement, but nope, he continues to make fk up after fk up. hes a little partial to throwing people under the bus, but rest assured, if u think the handouts hes throwing to lyndhurst are excessive, wait til u see what else he has in store. sorry, what the board will have cannizzo believe he has in store. cannizzo is the concrete boots of the sfl. next time your club is up at the tribunal, query yourself if your evidence is actually considered??? the verdicts are deterimed before you even arrive. applying for finals, forget it, thats been decided well before acceptances even opened. rough trot from the umpires? maybe thats because his opinions are openly expressed within the umpiring fraternity. label me a novellist? scratch the surface, these bones arent laid to deep.
Surely you would have worked out how to win a premiership in the last few years with your superior socio economic class. You would hate to loose to a team like doveton this weekendI just thought if I'm going to see people from low socio-economic areas insult my club, might as well do some good for society and improve their grammar.
But yes, I've seen our boys plenty of times trash talk on the field.
As long as it helps their game and we win, and it doesn't extend beyond the game and/or it isn't racial/homophobic/personal, then "play on".
You
you'll probably be here next year anyways mate so don't get ahead of yourself... Much rather own my house in berwick than live in my parents back room in mount waverly like yaself anyday....
You've been in this same position plenty of times in the last 5 years and the end result has always been the same
Is it in effect in div 3? I thought it was only being used in div 1.I know I'm harping on this but why isn't the SFNL publishing what points each club is using per game ??? seems pointless unless they do.They hammered each club pre-season only seems fair and logical they did.
Why would you say that all clubs had to give their points per player in Div 3 unless it's changed, wasn't it supposed to be across the 3 divisions of the comp.Is it in effect in div 3? I thought it was only being used in div 1.
Lyndhurst would be the highestIt's across all divs. I'd be very surprised if any div 3 clubs are even close to the cap