- Sep 8, 2008
- 12,268
- 24,237
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- T**ty Bong two's
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Really interested to see who gets delisted from the senior list. I think out of kennedy, mabon, sierakoswki, firrito and maybe gysberts only one will survive the cut.
yea he is the one i'm thinking will play on next year out of that lot and we will delist kennedy,sierakowski, mabon and also gysberts potentially (hope we keey gys also).I doubt very much Firrito will be one or you would have assumed it would have got out by now, especially when tomorrow could be his farewell game.
Some of these Harper calls are hilarious. Player X didn't play this year so he has all of a sudden become trade bait, out of favour, no good. Did anyone actually watch him play last year? You want to get rid of someone with that outside potency? Seriously, what would we trade to get in something like that?
His endurance is just not good to take in along with all the other mids who can't run out games. He just can't play until his tank is built up.
He has worked hard over the pre-season to build on his fitness (he was only playing 59% ToG last year), he has struggled with the load, he will have another solid endurance building pre-season and they will build his strength and endurance up.
Harper is going to be icing on the cake, he kicked 25 goals last year only playing 59% ToG, get him up to 85% ToG at the same potency and that is 36 goals, if we can make it as a top 4 side without him then when he comes into the side he is going to give us that firepower to blow teams off the park.
Del Santo is a free agent. We don't need to trade for him.
I think it's a clause that can be activated by the club that kicks off a further year based on his physical condition. When the home club are putting clauses into a contract based upon a wearing body then I think there might be one or two alarm bells.Dal Santo has some sort of contract trap that requires negotiation with StKilda. I don't know what it is, but he isn't a straight free agency arrangement and nor is he a restricted free agent. There's something else going on there.
I do not think the delistings will be all that difficult. There are 8 players on list who could be traded or delisted.
Their numbers are: 4,11,15,19,24,28,33,and 36
I do not think the delistings will be all that difficult. There are 8 players on list who could be traded or delisted.
Their numbers are: 4,11,15,19,24,28,33,and 36
Levi almost certainly will request trades.
We must do everything possible to retain Levi.
I fear Spitta being out and having to rely on more kids.
In my eyes when Spitta went down Levi became a required player.
Actually I think he was pretty required before that although I also see him wanting to part ways now.
I'd have him in the first backup if Ziebell, Cunners or Swallow goes down. I'd be keeping him to play potentially for the first 2-8 weeks while Swallow is out.
However i don't think Brad sees it that way. Jacobs is in front of him, even though most of us believe Levi is more valuable at this stage.
Is a kid.
Jack, Spitta, Levi, and Cunners play like men.
There is a gap in hardness between Levi and Jacobs.
We must do everything possible to retain Levi.
I fear Spitta being out and having to rely on more kids.
In my eyes when Spitta went down Levi became a required player.
Actually I think he was pretty required before that although I also see him wanting to part ways now.
We must do everything possible to retain Levi.
I fear Spitta being out and having to rely on more kids.
In my eyes when Spitta went down Levi became a required player.
Actually I think he was pretty required before that although I also see him wanting to part ways now.
I'd definitely prefer to keep Levi for another year too, but I wonder if he sees it that way.
We might get away without Levi next year if Garner continues his attack on the pill... we also have Jacobs as well who can play inside. if the right deal comes- along pull the trigger.I'd definitely prefer to keep Levi for another year too, but I wonder if he sees it that way.
I doubt we would actively look to trade him out considering the issue with Spitz, unless we were offered summit good and he wanted to walk for more guaranteed opportunities.
We might get away without Levi next year if Garner continues his attack on the pill... we also have Jacobs as well who can play inside. if the right deal comes- along pull the trigger.