Deliberate call was correct. If you have time and space to dispose of the footy, you must
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bresnehan had a brain fart. Too focused on running into defence instead of manning the mark to prevent Randall playing on.Great work by Randall is rewarded with a goal
Good luck against the crows in Adelaide next weekWho comes here looking forward to a North Melbourne vs Fremantle GF?
Kicked way straighter than us and still lost, so I don't think that's itUnfortunately, Adelaide haven't kicked straight for a long time. Our last six matches have seen us score 34.49. And if you exclude the 14.8 performance against GWS (who didn't put up much of a fight), it's 20.41.
I'd dearly love for them to get their goalkicking right when it really counts, but it would require a massive turnaround in form.
You're that bullish about Brisbane?Actually think it will be the winner of the other qf that wins the flag
I think Brisbane have the right make up to counter the roos, yes.Kicked way straighter than us and still lost, so I don't think that's it
You're that bullish about Brisbane?
Kicked way straighter than us and still lost, so I don't think that's it
I'm sure you're right but our backline does this to everyone, we're normally really hard to score against even when the opposition gets a lot of I50sAdelaide has had two issues. One - they have tended to miss genuine shots on goal. Not an issue tonight, at least! Two - they struggle to turn I50s into genuine shots on goal. That was on full display tonight.
I'm sure you're right but our backline does this to everyone, we're normally really hard to score against even when the opposition gets a lot of I50s
This is the point: “to be paid every day”. Just about every time this situation happens in footy, a huge amount of latitude is given to the defender. This time, this umpire decided not to. So is this situation now going “to be paid every day”? Or was this just a one-off decision that happened to swing things right back in favour of the home team at a crucial point in the game?I’d call it in the spirit of the rule. She picked up the ball when no north player was within 9 m, then just stood there before walking it back over the line. I’m happy for that to be paid every day
I would have been annoyed at the player for being stupid, but yes I would also want it to be paid more consistently too. There aren't many that blatant in my recollection.This is the point: “to be paid every day”. Just about every time this situation happens in footy, a huge amount of latitude is given to the defender. This time, this umpire decided not to. So is this situation now going “to be paid every day”? Or was this just a one-off decision that happened to swing things right back in favour of the home team at a crucial point in the game?
Let’s face it, all of us would have been highly pissed if this had been paid against our team.
The issue was compounded by the fact Ferguson (and to a lesser extent Wright) had her worst game of the season. I wouldn't expect Ferguson to play that poorly again in the GF if they were to meet again.Adelaide has had two issues. One - they have tended to miss genuine shots on goal. Not an issue tonight, at least! Two - they struggle to turn I50s into genuine shots on goal. That was on full display tonight.
This is the point: “to be paid every day”. Just about every time this situation happens in footy, a huge amount of latitude is given to the defender. This time, this umpire decided not to. So is this situation now going “to be paid every day”? Or was this just a one-off decision that happened to swing things right back in favour of the home team at a crucial point in the game?
Let’s face it, all of us would have been highly pissed if this had been paid against our team.
Plus we will get Kearney backThe issue was compounded by the fact Ferguson (and to a lesser extent Wright) had her worst game of the season. I wouldn't expect Ferguson to play that poorly again in the GF if they were to meet again.
If North lost the flag it would be one of hell of a choke. Just far too good all season long.
Harsh but true to say the AFL don't have much use for Fremantle and Port Adelaide after this week, as they'd obviously much rather Essendon and Richmond to be the away teams in the semis. And they'd probably want the first prelim to be NM vs Haw/Rich on a Friday night.
In the meantime, though, they might be useful for ticking over the turnstiles. With last night's crowd announced as 3689, the other matches this weekend should draw as follows:
Frem v Ess - 5638PA v Rich - 4553Haw v BL - 5963(Total: 19,844 - up 4.5% on 2023)
That's assuming the difference between NM men's home crowds (in Melbourne) and Frem/PA/Haw men's home crowds (in their respective home cities) is proportionate to AFLW figures.
I'm personally not expecting Hawthorn will get that many, whereas Port Adelaide should comfortably clear 4.5k (given they drew 4.1k last Sunday at 4.35pm vs GWS).
Fremantle is the big unknown. Record attendance for da boyz this year (4th highest in the league despite failing to make finals). But crowds for da girlz this year are well down on the league average, despite finishing 5th on the ladder. And you could perhaps intuit that from another wacky editorial choice by the paper over there...