Sorry but No...Would you guys be interested in 18, future 3rd & Jack Steven for 24, 36 & 37. Essentially points wise would be Jack Steven for 37 and you'd trade up the draft which I hear is what you want. We'd get chips for other trades.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Sorry but No...Would you guys be interested in 18, future 3rd & Jack Steven for 24, 36 & 37. Essentially points wise would be Jack Steven for 37 and you'd trade up the draft which I hear is what you want. We'd get chips for other trades.
Other than Kelly whose situation was vastly different to 99% of draftees, when was the last time we lost a player to the go home factor?After the whole Tim Kelly debacle id just like us to draft Vic kids, stuff the interstaters, stick with Flanders etc. Not worth the risk of them wanting home to mummy after a year...unless they are like Clark and cant wait to get out of there.
I should clarify why I wouldn't... Next year's draft is meant to be the weakest in years, so you giving a future 3rd round is worth peanuts.. And I speak for majority cat's fans here, taking Jack Steven for anything higher what Wells wants to give is a huge risk... Why I say that Enter Mitch Clark, we gave up a guy called Varcoe who would of still been playing for us, as taking a risk with a guy who has Mental Health Issues is a huge risk where we could take a 18 year old or even a mature age player that could be long term better for us...Would you guys be interested in 18, future 3rd & Jack Steven for 24, 36 & 37? Essentially points wise would be Jack Steven for 37 and you'd trade up the draft which I hear is what you want. We'd get chips for other trades.
Would you guys be interested in 18, future 3rd & Jack Steven for 24, 36 & 37? Essentially points wise would be Jack Steven for 37 and you'd trade up the draft which I hear is what you want. We'd get chips for other trades.
Other than Kelly whose situation was vastly different to 99% of draftees, when was the last time we lost a player to the go home factor?
Does Henry Playfair to Sydney count?Other than Kelly whose situation was vastly different to 99% of draftees, when was the last time we lost a player to the go home factor?
After the whole Tim Kelly debacle id just like us to draft Vic kids, stuff the interstaters, stick with Flanders etc. Not worth the risk of them wanting home to mummy after a year...unless they are like Clark and cant wait to get out of there.
Other than Kelly whose situation was vastly different to 99% of draftees, when was the last time we lost a player to the go home factor?
Hill link doesn't surprise me, exact player we need.
as a FA perfect..
How about from 08 to 15? Did he have the golden touch throughout these years?Ratugolea, Narkle, Clark, Parfitt, Kelly, Henry (rookie pick), Constable, Stewart, Atkins, O’Connor, etc. etc. Wells hasn’t lost any touch, if you’ve been paying any attention at all.
Cant see how we get Hill on the dollars he would want
Depending on where your finish next year that could be an ordinary trade to a bad trade. It has a estimated deficit of 450 points so thats JS at around P37 .. at best about P48 if you finish near last. I cant see that trade happening ... I think you may have JS for another 12 months..
Ho
How about from 08 to 15? Did he have the golden touch throughout these years?
Pretty good suggestionWould you guys be interested in 18, future 3rd & Jack Steven for 24, 36 & 37? Essentially points wise would be Jack Steven for 37 and you'd trade up the draft which I hear is what you want. We'd get chips for other trades.
Freo probably want Menengola, pick 14 & 17.
Pretty good suggestion
We definitely want 18
Jack Stevens is worth approx 37-45
We need a future 3rd next year as we will have list spots to fill in 2020
Essentially we are getting 18 for and a future 3rd (46ish) for 24 and 36. Moving up to 18 is worth far more points than 200 points in the real world so who cares if we end up on the wrong side of the points slightly. I also think ppl are getting spooked by next year's draft and all the academy picks getting talked up. For every one taken a pick is used. So go up and some evaporate so 45 would be very valuable next year on a number of fronts.
Leaves us with 14,17,18, this year and 2 first rounder, a second and a 3rd next year. Ppl need to remember we will only have 3 list spots free this year. We could also float 2 of the 5 1st rounders to get as higher pick as possible this year which everyone seems obsessed by.
Might end up with Flanders, Kemp and Jackson/Stephen yet. With Steven as well that is a pretty decent offseason.
If we get Brad Hill, does Blicavs move to the other wing?
Freo probably want Menengola, pick 14 & 17.
Duncan was a great get and shame about Menzel and his knee.2009 was a reasonable draft - Duncan, Menzel, Christiansen. Vardy and Hogan to a lesser extent.
If only it was an exact science, hey?
If nothing else a few of these trade options mean that the next few days should be interesting...
Interesting outcome..
Flanders , CopperS , and a couple Wells types say Bergman... we will add some sort of tall at some stage..
I really want Flanders. Like those other names you floated too.