Review Good/Bad v Port Adelaide, Round 3

Remove this Banner Ad

If I recall correctly, they went on a 8-0 centre clearance tear halfway through the third, then we dried it up.
Did they score from these clearances?

Or were our backs able to repel alk the f50s from these centre clearances?

I watched the game again last night I reckon they only had one scoring shot from that run.

The scores they did get were from turnovers caused by us or where they were able to get a kick through our forward press.

They are not a centre clearance scoring side. Mainly because they dont have good marking forwards. Look at the marks inside 50 differential against them.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Did they score from these clearances?

Or were our backs able to repel alk the f50s from these centre clearances?

I watched the game again last night I reckon they only had one scoring shot from that run.

The scores they did get were from turnovers caused by us or where they were able to get a kick through our forward press.

They are not a centre clearance scoring side. Mainly because they dont have good marking forwards. Look at the marks inside 50 differential against them.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Reminded me very much of us circa 2012. In fact, their whole game plan was out of the Sando handbook.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Reminded me very much of us circa 2012. In fact, their whole game plan was out of the Sando handbook.

Reading their autopsy thread was giving me flashbacks to 2014 Sando.
 
We seemed to waste so many opportunities in the second quarter. I thought we should have been well ahead at half time considering our general dominance.
Yes, I keep saying this each week myself. We cannot continue to waste so many opportunities, especially when we may struggle to get these opportunities constantly in some games.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Review Good/Bad v Port Adelaide, Round 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top