Play Nice Hawthorn culture and Fagan

Remove this Banner Ad

This is going to be a very touchy subject.

There will be a very broad range of opinions about the correct way to handle this.

I'll remind everyone to post respectfully at this time - sniping at each other is not going to help.

Any continued pointless back and forth will get a day or more to cool off. If you want to avoid this fate, let it go.
 
Last edited:
See, this is something that REALLY frustrates me.....

We can't even get the number of interviewees confirmed ahahaha



"Clarkson and Fagan were not interviewed as part of the review that started as a wellbeing check on the 21 Indigenous players."

21 there,,,,,,



"Egan spoke with 17 First Nations former players, partners and staff members, five of whom were willing to go on the record with their experiences, with some text messages, emails and written transcripts shared with the report authors."

.....but 17 here.

:drunk::drunk::drunk:
They did a well-being check on 21 players.

Only 17 would speak with them.

Of those 17, only five would go on the record.

I don't see the discrepancy.
 
They did a well-being check on 21 players.

Only 17 would speak with them.

Of those 17, only five would go on the record.

I don't see the discrepancy.

Sure, I can do the maths too lol.

The point being, we have to infer from 2 reports.

There is a number that were interviewed. That number is a fact.

How hard is it to get everyone reporting on this to simply deal with known facts?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sure, I can do the maths too lol.

The point being, we have to infer from 2 reports.

There is a number that were interviewed. That number is a fact.

How hard is it to get everyone reporting on this to simply deal with known facts?

Respectfully I think it’s not as hard to understand as you’re making it out.
 
Respectfully I think it’s not as hard to understand as you’re making it out.

It shouldn't even be an issue BRAB lol.

But when I have to fact-check the most elementary of statements, it irritates me at the sloppiness of the reporting.

I mean, I took up a HS sub just for this story - so the sensational reporting has worked ahaha - and for my $1.00/week I EXPECT 100% ACCURACY AT ALL TIMES :D

It's not somethingt that needs harping on about, but it IS a reflection on the reporting standards, in this case of the HS Sports desk.

I'd rather one or two correct, well-written pieces than eleventy articles with some grainy brown nugget of fact squirreled away inside.
 
It shouldn't even be an issue BRAB lol.

But when I have to fact-check the most elementary of statements, it irritates me at the sloppiness of the reporting.

I mean, I took up a HS sub just for this story - so the sensational reporting has worked ahaha - and for my $1.00/week I EXPECT 100% ACCURACY AT ALL TIMES :D

It's not somethingt that needs harping on about, but it IS a reflection on the reporting standards, in this case of the HS Sports desk.

I'd rather one or two correct, well-written pieces than eleventy articles with some grainy brown nugget of fact squirreled away inside.

Yeah but I think it’s more of a reading comprehension issue on your part than anything else.
 
And it continues
All about Clarkson so at least no mention of Fagan

*Told Mitchell to hand in his mobile phone - along with the rest of the team - on the eve of an interstate game against Sydney during a period in which one of his twin babies was being frequently admitted to hospital.



 
I'm with jonnobackpocket here. I also don't see why this has to be seen thru the racial spectrum. I guess it's because it was a race based review to start with. A review of the whole playing group and not just the indigenous players I'm sure would have revealed the same hard line applied to all players. If that's the case it's not a racial thing but a failure of man management techniques and procedures.

Sometimes in clubland you have to protect players from themselves, from distracting mates, from interfering family, from self destructing behaviour. Regardless of colour.

I personally don't think there's a racist bone in Fages body. There's been absolutely no hint of that in his time here. Quite the opposite really. His support and development of Kiddy Coleman, the obvious mutual affection shown too and by Charlie Cameron and the other indigenous players. Early in his stint here the support given to Bundy and his problems. I really hope the great indigenous boys we have here at the club believe their own eyes and experiences here and are not influenced by as yet untested allegations from 8-12 years ago.

To me, it's an unbalanced review if all players weren't interviewed to assess commonality with these issues. If that had happened a much clearer indication whether its racial or poor management techniques that are at question here.

This whole thing has been handled poorly. The unbalanced review to not include all players as a control, to not allow those accused to have a right of reply before the review was finalised, to leak details to the ABC that again only reported half the story, the rest of the media's presumption of guilt.
 
I might not have a full understanding but why is it being stamped as racism? Did whatever happen, happen because the players were indigenous ? or because of the situation they found themselves in? Was a hard line (I understand this maybe an understatement if some of the allegations are true) taken with non indigenous players as well? Obviously exactly what happened will help answer the question…….

I haven’t really heard it be described directly as ‘racist acts’ like calling names etc.

I think the accusations more relate the welfare issues.

The accusers claim to have been subjected to similar instances of control, manipulation, bullying and intimidation that other players claim they didn’t, the accusers are all indigenous.

Secondly, the accusers all came from remote communities and didn’t have the same ability and life experience to protect them selves, with a strong existing network around them.

It would have been a lot easier to subject isolated indigenous families, to what has been accused, than say - a white player with a strong family network around them and people to turn to.

It is viewed where their welfare should have been paramount it was taken advantage of, their independence was not valued as much as others.

That is why, the accusations are being made on racial lines, the more serious accusations are claimed to only happened to indigenous players and given they were isolated and disempowered, it is claimed they took advantage of their difficult position.

I am genuinely just answering your question as to why some are drawing this along racial lines not trying to argue or be combative, so please don’t feel the need to go at me in response.

I also used claimed, allegations etc - I am not arguing that it is true or Fages is responsible.
 
Luke Hodge has just put out a statement



Hodgey using his family as an example of how he values Fages opinion is very powerful - so powerful that virtue seeking commentators like Stan Grant will find it difficult to ignore.
Bloody hell, Hodgey is as up front as a leader off field as he was on.
 
The initial stories, and so far the worst accounts, are from the indigenous review and reports.

It's entirely possible that it was just a controlling and potentially abusive environment across the board, but so far the statements have been denying everything rather than saying "we did it to everyone". The examples for non-indigenous players at Hawthorn are controlling, but a lot more restrained by comparison.
2012 on your club website:
The first indigenous player to get to 100 games is very relevant to club culture.

Is 2012 in the timeframe? Were the players (unnamed) on the list then.
 
And it continues
All about Clarkson so at least no mention of Fagan

*Told Mitchell to hand in his mobile phone - along with the rest of the team - on the eve of an interstate game against Sydney during a period in which one of his twin babies was being frequently admitted to hospital.



Are we lucky Mitchell isn't indigenous or is this allegation just as serious as the others? Interested to hear other BF posters opinions.

I guess Sam at least put his name to it rather that stay under the cloak of anonymity.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Spot on, not many mentioning this in threads on Big Footy, some even use it as a subtle cudgel against the coaches, Fagan and Clarkson would be mad not to Lawyer up considering the severity of the allegations... it is career ending stuff as well as reputation destroying.
I agree. I believe some have a hidden agenda or personal points make. It's the only conclusion I can come to, when some are passing judgement on this terrible situation without ALL the facts.

I feel for the people who have made the accusations, in that I hope they have been accurately quoted in these media release, as being misrepresented can tarnish reputations and any further statements they make.

I also feel for the people that have been named in the accusations as they have not had the opportunity to tell their story in public domain.

As I have mentioned before the only way for both parties to get a fair and impartial hearing is in the courts.

AFL has too much invested to allow anything to come out that would be detrimental to it's brand and by the same token it should be removed from the public domain (media) by way of gag orders and suppression orders as the media have a lot invested in this story.
 
With the revelations about Sam Mitchell and his relationship with Clarkson having a light shone on it now.... IMO it is reasonable to assume that whatever happened in incidents revealed in the Hawthorn review while concerning they were not racially motivated ie. racism.

Seems like controlling behaviour and misguided but coming from a place of wanting to be in the best space to win footy games and wanting the best playing wise for the players concerned, maybe culturally insensitive but not racism. This sort of domineering persona from coaches would have been very typical in footy clubs all over the world at the time, it is only recently that the father figure/empathetic coach has been widely viewed as the best way to go now and into the future.

I am starting to see a way out of this where Clarkson and Fagan will be able to continue with their coaching.
 
I haven’t really heard it be described directly as ‘racist acts’ like calling names etc.

I think the accusations more relate the welfare issues.

The accusers claim to have been subjected to similar instances of control, manipulation, bullying and intimidation that other players claim they didn’t, the accusers are all indigenous.

Secondly, the accusers all came from remote communities and didn’t have the same ability and life experience to protect them selves, with a strong existing network around them.

It would have been a lot easier to subject isolated indigenous families, to what has been accused, than say - a white player with a strong family network around them and people to turn to.

It is viewed where their welfare should have been paramount it was taken advantage of, their independence was not valued as much as others.

That is why, the accusations are being made on racial lines, the more serious accusations are claimed to only happened to indigenous players and given they were isolated and disempowered, it is claimed they took advantage of their difficult position.

I am genuinely just answering your question as to why some are drawing this along racial lines not trying to argue or be combative, so please don’t feel the need to go at me in response.

I also used claimed, allegations etc - I am not arguing that it is true or Fages is responsible.
Are you assuming all white players have a strong family network around them? In my time in the system back in the late 70's/early 80's there were some pretty sad stories of white players lives who were in a world of pain.... not sure what the balance was compared to indigenous issues were. I guess what I am saying is that regardless of any color, creed, sexual preference or gender, none of us are exempt from hard times. Even white peoples culture plays a role in that.
 
Are you assuming all white players have a strong family network around them? In my time in the system back in the late 70's/early 80's there were some pretty sad stories of white players lives who were in a world of pain.... not sure what the balance was compared to indigenous issues were. I guess what I am saying is that regardless of any color, creed, sexual preference or gender, none of us are exempt from hard times. Even white peoples culture plays a role in that.
As a white person myself I always find it hard to define what modern Caucasian culture is.:think:

Maybe?- celebrity worship, fame whoring, alcohol, gluttony, consumerism.

Personally the things that matter to me are family and being proud of the way you treat others and lead your life.. is that culture?
 
As a white person myself I always find it hard to define what modern Caucasian culture is.:think:

Maybe?- celebrity worship, fame whoring, alcohol, gluttony, consumerism.

Personally the things that matter to me are family and being proud of the way you treat others and lead your life.. is that culture?
I thought it was burn outs and VB???
 
Are you assuming all white players have a strong family network around them? In my time in the system back in the late 70's/early 80's there were some pretty sad stories of white players lives who were in a world of pain.... not sure what the balance was compared to indigenous issues were. I guess what I am saying is that regardless of any color, creed, sexual preference or gender, none of us are exempt from hard times. Even white peoples culture plays a role in that.

No, I do not assume all white players have a strong family network around them.

Yep, all people fall on hard times and in that situation, whether it’s desperation, isolation, poverty, mental illness etc - the way those in positions of power interact with those in vulnerable positions, becomes especially important.

Welfare becomes paramount, especially in big organisations.

Feels like the defence is becoming (not from you, just generally) ‘they probably treated everyone like shit’.. which I don’t know is going to be especially helpful.
 
As a white person myself I always find it hard to define what modern Caucasian culture is.:think:

Maybe?- celebrity worship, fame whoring, alcohol, gluttony, consumerism.

Personally the things that matter to me are family and being proud of the way you treat others and lead your life.. is that culture?
I think that description is a big part of a certain person's culture. Family values, understanding, acceptance of others are all traits of the culture you do or don't grow up in. Many more traits not mentioned but we all probably have unique cultures to a certain degree depending on who brought us up, where & how we lived, what principles were instilled in us from a young age.
 
Feels like the defence is becoming (not from you, just generally) ‘they probably treated everyone like s**t’.. which I don’t know is going to be especially helpful.
IMO that makes a huge difference, takes out the racism accusation, makes it misguided domineering behaviour, not anywhere near the same level of abhorrence as blatant racism.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Hawthorn culture and Fagan

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top