He's started again
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
No.Take it to the bank?
At the end of his show The Ox just popped out "Tom Scully to the Hawks."
He's started again
He also said Shiel to Carlton, take it to the bank.At the end of his show The Ox just popped out "Tom Scully to the Hawks."
In a perfect world I wholeheartedly agree with you regarding the merits on how we entice players to come to hawthorn, and for the previous 8-9 years (before 17) we could sell a dream of success. The said dream is far more fanciful than reality at this present moment, we have to understand that the elite players don’t need us, we actually need them more and we may need to pay more than we’re comfortable with.
Make no mistake, alarm bells would be ringing.. like any good business operator, if you have 3-4 big swings at deals/opportunities then you’re going to reflect and look to do things differently because there’s something not right in your approach. Wrighty has the runs on the board, but it’s probably fair to say he has a bit of work to do to get back into the top bracket of operators in the league. I am sure, and I like to think it’s true that GW and Co and working on their philosophies and approach as a matter of urgency right now.
8 days to make our list better, that’s what they have, otherwise it’s to the draft where he has struggled in recent times to get quality players in with our first pick.
We might have been right in it, but the fact that the 3 other clubs supposedly in the hunt for Shiel are all basketcases makes me okay with missing out on him. I think most people were more worked up for one of the absolute best FA's, Shiel was the more realistic but slightly meh option.I know you do the negative thing and that's cool, but I think you've got this one wrong.
Did anyone from Hawthorn ever actually say that we were after Shiel this past month?? I mean from the club directly.
Because I don't remember it. It seems like a few convinced themselves that he was a monty and have worked themselves into a tizz about missing out on something that might of never been in play...
Im chuffed we keep it close with no leaks, what does that gain?
It makes your competitors pay overs now and gives them a cap issue in the future and eliminates them from chasing your real targets. Don't you watch Game of Thrones?
Lol it’d be nice to see them held to account every now and thenSadly, Tom Browne has been wrong on all fronts regarding player trade movements.
We’re fu****.
If anyone had an opinion on it around here ya ain’t gunna hear about it any time soon ....
Can not be ****** with the Bullshit it would bring if we missed !!
Sadly, Tom Browne has been wrong on all fronts regarding player trade movements.
We’re fu****.
Lol it’d be nice to see them held to account every now and then
Why not let's load up on 30+ year olds.Barlow has been delisted and would give him a crack for say 250k for a year as I think a pretty good player?
Could do worse for next to nothing..
Shiel can suck the blood from my plums. We move on. Shiel who?I think this is a pretty big assumption.
If Shiel was always 100% committed to us he wouldn't have entertained other clubs. No matter what so many on here wanted to say about it. If Shiel was determined to get to HFC, he would have. GWS would have had no other bidders.
As such, if Shiel wasn't 100% committed the onus was always on us to convince him. Neither Shiel or Connors should be thought of negatively for taking perhaps a far longer term, more lucrative offer. He was never ours to have and he only needs to answer to himself and his family.
Many on here are pissed at Shiel and Connors primarily because some on here tried to convince the majority it was a done deal. It wasn't.
I love the club and in all honesty I'm not too fussed we have missed on Shiel when the bidding got to insane amounts.
However, you do have to wonder if we ****** this up with a 'wait and see approach to Lynch' or a temptation with 'the Chad'.
Perhaps two weeks ago we had him at 800k a year and then we started thinking we could get a hotter bird, before ultimately coming crawling back at 1am drunk on the dance floor.
Any way we can create a new thread and lock out the flogs from here who don't understand that things change and it is never a business of certainty?
I for one would be shattered to lose the ITK input of posters like yourself and Topiary.
The opposite of NFI.Could someone please explain what "ITK" stands for?
You'd cut (or trade out) a Miles (for example) for a Shiel or a Wingard. But a Barlow?
In actual practice, space needs to be made for this trade bravado. Thats why we have pros doing it.
People are hung up on next year. Look Shiel isn’t going to make a huge difference. He’s a mid and a statistically average one. Losing all our picks and paying him a million a year makes no sense when coniglio kelly and a range of other players become available.
I would have been devastated if we lost out on a better player next year because we shot our load on an average one this year