![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/adelaide.png)
Definitely in reference to Dawson. Said he was Laird like with his lack of impact lately
not me, I must have missed the original post and picked up only on the reference to Laird.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Definitely in reference to Dawson. Said he was Laird like with his lack of impact lately
Well, Rachele was pick 6 and Pedlar was pick 11.......
I didn't mean Dawson-as-midfielder, or as stats-accumulator; more about his game impact.nope, wouldn't get a game in any of Port's, Dogs' or Demon's midfields.
That's a sweeping claim. How do you know that, or is it a hunch? That's not a cheap shot. If you have evidence going back directly to Nicks and raw disposal numbers, please quote them. If Nicks is a raw numbers man, I want him out and away from the AFC.You need to understand that it's only at our club where stats are used to value performance.
I remembered the Tweet-fight, summarised well here:The Greenwood dig at Roo wasn't a joke sledge, he shined a light on a genuine club philosophy.
Rachele played midfield during his draft year so I highly doubt we pigeon hole him as only a small forward when we drafted him. Jones has finally been putting up consistent numbers which he severe lacked until this year but I don't think he will reach the level of Rachele and Pedlar as top 10 midfielder pick, potentially a solid B+ grader which isn't bad for a pick 9.Rachele was drafted as an elite small forward that could potentially become a high level mid. Hoping he does, because 6 and 5 on small forwards back to back is horrific draft/trade strategy given our midfield was full of b grade draft horses. For too long we've looked at our favourable stoppage stat and deluded ourselves into believing that you don't need to spend big on elite mids. 11 is not a big spend, but (injury/body permitting) it looks like we spent it well. I rate Pedlar highly and I've backed Jones in the whole way and reckon he can be a weapon in there too.
But fact is that we've had a few sub 10 picks the last few years and Jones is the only mid we used the picks on. That's pure incompetence or flawed list strategy and/or understanding of the modern game, regardless of whether Jones lives up to the value. And I remain hopeful that he will.
I didn't mean Dawson-as-midfielder, or as stats-accumulator; more about his game impact.
Dawson's smart, an elite kick and hard two-way runner; Top 5 in AFLCA voting.
I still think any Club would be happy to have him. Where they'd play him is anybody's guess.
That's a sweeping claim. How do you know that, or is it a hunch? That's not a cheap shot. If you have evidence going back directly to Nicks and raw disposal numbers, please quote them. If Nicks is a raw numbers man, I want him out and away from the AFC.
I don't know if that's the case or not, but my hunch is that all AFL Clubs look at player stats but give more weight to the 1%ers and a player's game impact more than just raw kicks and handballs.
I remembered the Tweet-fight, summarised well here:
In the GCS/Crows game, Greenwood had 6 clearances to the Crows total 7, 10 possessions, 13 tackles.![]()
Traded AFL star in Twitter beef with old club
Can't help himself after big performancewwos.nine.com.au
Roo's jibe about "only 10 touches" was dumb, but Roo is dumb and it says more about Roo than a Club philosophy, doesn't it?
I loved Greenwood. Keays reminds me of him. I was unhappy when he was traded at the end of 2019, pre-Nicks. From memory, Greenwood wanted to stay but it was about contract length and GCS offered more years, is that right?
Greenwood's value was in the 1%ers, contested possessions, tackling (avged about 7/game) and other game impacts, here:
![]()
What the numbers say about Hugh Greenwood
He played a crucial role in Gold Coast’s win over his former club Adelaide at Metricon Stadium in Round 3, but just how do Hugh Greenwood’s numbers truly stack up?www.goldcoastfc.com.au
We certainly could have used Greenwood in the midfield yesterday!
Rachele played midfield during his draft year so I highly doubt we pigeon hole him as only a small forward when we drafted him. Jones has finally been putting up consistent numbers which he severe lacked until this year but I don't think he will reach the level of Rachele and Pedlar as top 10 midfielder pick, potentially a solid B+ grader which isn't bad for a pick 9.
No mate.
Covid restricted season in his top age year and no football in his underage year.
U16's All Australian, U 16's Nationals M.V.P. (Kevan Sheahan Medal) and U16's Vic Country M.V.P. at the U16's Nationals playing as a pure midfielder.
Connor Rozee also an U16's Kevan Sheahan medalist at the Nationals in his 16's yearplaying midfield...how long before he became a full time mid?
Connor Rozee also played mostly forward at the U18's Nationals even spent time in defence in his top age year and played forward for North Adelaide...with no Covid restrictions whatsoever
I also note with interest you conveniently only snipped what suited your argument from his Rookie Me bio...
View attachment 1692993...
What utter bullshit....JHF never missed one game in his underage or top age year...not one...Rachele played only a handful in his top age year and never played at all in his under age year.So covid affected only his development? Not the other players in that draft.
What utter bullshit....JHF never missed one game in his underage or top age year...not one...Rachele played only a handful in his top age year and never played at all in his under age year.
Who from his draft is doing a whole lot better than him, certainly not JHF who never missed a game or any training throughout his development.
You're way off here whith your usual negativity.
Go track down Hamish's comments after we drafted Josh if you want to see/hear why we picked him...
Strange for someone we don't consider as a midfielder, we have been having him attend CBA's...
Keays and Sloane both shouldn't be in our midfield. Sloane needs a good rest for 2-3weeks. I reckon this is his final year so it's best to send him out with some good performances 2nd half of the year. I think the major problem with our midfield lately is that Dawson has been down some games. Laird has been injured as well and not at his best. The rest of our midfield is young but give them another 50 games and we will be in better shape. We do need to recruit another big bodied ball user that can also win it. Maybe we are going after Parish.Keays as a mid in 2021/22 offered more as a mid than Sloane is offering now.
McHenry (who has been in good form) would probably offer more than Keays as a half forward.
Sloane has played some good games but it's becoming problematic to have a guy who can barely run in there.
Better than Keays I guess. I never watch him tbh but he's the player I hear being brought up that we might be into. He's never really caught my eye in Essendon games. We need to be bringing someone in as our midfield is up there as one of the worst going around.Parish is a big bodied ball user?
If you’re looking at getting Parish, you get him as a Laird replacement. He’s not the fix to our midfield issues, otherwiseBetter than Keays I guess. I never watch him tbh but he's the player I hear being brought up that we might be into. He's never really caught my eye in Essendon games. We need to be bringing someone in as our midfield is up there as one of the worst going around.
Day was the one we needed but Hawks opened up the cheque book. Maybe we can still get him when ooc or possibly during.If you’re looking at getting Parish, you get him as a Laird replacement. He’s not the fix to our midfield issues, otherwise
Wow.
And some people think we’re on the improve? It’s a fake improve, because this midfield isn’t going to get us anywhere near it.
No class, no speed. No one close to elite, and I don’t think anyone on the list who could even potentially get to elite. Laird? Will rack up 30 today with zero impact. So far from elite.
Shameful drafting and list management.
Rubbish Izak went at pick 3 in his draft year and Nick Watson will go top 5 in this year's draft, Liam Henry went pick 9 a couple of years ago, Ben Aisworth went pick 4, Jarrod Pickett also went at pick 4.
You think Kysaiah Pickett wouldn't draw a pick inside 5 or 6 if he was to be traded?
What do you think Toby Greene would have brought pick wise if he was on the market at Izak's age?
You think not one club would jump at the chance to get Rachele for a top 10 pick right now even if he wast just a small forward?
Rankine is a quality finisher but I expected more for what we gave up. He must finish off the goals where he is running at the goal from 50 out. He's done it twice now. I also want to see him get more involved in general play. We basically need more from him.Outside of McAsey pick when we could have had Serong (or even Day) when could we have got one
There was no midfielder of note when we draft Thilthorpe that has done well/ didn’t have issues
Rachele I think will be a gun mid
I think Rankine adds the X factor required to win big games and so that pick was okay
Wasn’t Jones better than Butters leading into his draft
Let’s not argue Rankine - we got a quality player
What would you have done differently list wise
Who would you target now?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Keays as a mid in 2021/22 offered more as a mid than Sloane is offering now.
McHenry (who has been in good form) would probably offer more than Keays as a half forward.
Sloane has played some good games but it's becoming problematic to have a guy who can barely run in there.
Parish is a big bodied ball user?
Sloane is nearly 34. Most players are done by 30-31. Sloane was never going to be the answer to our midfield woes. The fact he is playing in there shows how bad our list management and recruiting has been for mids. That's pretty damning with some of the best picks the club has ever had over the last 5 years. The draft that really stands out is the rozee and butters draft. Add them into our midfield and we are a completely different team. Add Serong in there as well and we are competing for flags.Sloane had returned as a breath of fresh air. But we've started running him into the ground and his ego loves being a mid. Our coaches are incredibly weak and largely stupid.
Rubbish Izak went at pick 3 in his draft year and Nick Watson will go top 5 in this year's draft, Liam Henry went pick 9 a couple of years ago, Ben Aisworth went pick 4, Jarrod Pickett also went at pick 4.
You think Kysaiah Pickett wouldn't draw a pick inside 5 or 6 if he was to be traded?
What do you think Toby Greene would have brought pick wise if he was on the market at Izak's age?
You think not one club would jump at the chance to get Rachele for a top 10 pick right now even if he wast just a small forward?