Is Tait a risk for the World Cup?

[Your]

I feel that Shaun Tait could be a risk for the Australians. Although he is fast, I fear that his erratic bowling, and tendecy to bowl really fast may be really expensive.

I have seen Tait before, and he does not impress me one bit. He is a dud, soon the selectors will realise this and start picking some real bowlers- like Stuart Clark.

 

[likka]

New at this trolling business?

Back under your bridge.

P.S. You may be onto something though

 

[bus24]

I feel that Shaun Tait could be a risk for the Australians. Although he is fast, I fear that his erratic bowling, and tendecy to bowl really fast may be really expensive.

I have seen Tait before, and he does not impress me one bit. He is a dud, soon the selectors will realise this and start picking some real bowlers- like Stuart Clark.

Henry Lawson, how you going?

 

[Your]

New at this trolling business?

Back under your bridge.

P.S. You may be onto something though

Trolls are better-looking than me.

 

[Your]

Henry Lawson, how you going?

I don't support NSW. I support Tasmania.

But I believe that Clark is a better one day bowler that Tait.

 

[Mr P@H]

It'll come off or it won't, look at 2 bowling performances in the CB series. 1/65 odd and then around 3/25 or something like that... He'll bowl 2 snorters followed by a wide which could give the batsmen a let off, depends who is bowling along with Tait could change everything

 

[bus24]

I don't support NSW. I support Tasmania.

But I believe that Clark is a better one day bowler that Tait.

Well perhaps Tassie is more isolated than we thought?

At List A level

Clark - Average 29.50, SR - 40.04

Tait - Average 21.90, SR- 27.43

 

[Your]

Well perhaps Tassie is more isolated than we thought?

At List A level

Clark - Average 29.50, SR - 40.04

Tait - Average 21.90, SR- 27.43

Doesn't prove a thing.

 

[bus24]

Doesn't prove a thing.

What a pathetic response. Of course it means something.

Difference of 7.6 between the averages, thats HUGE.


Difference of 12.61 in Strike Rates, thats even Bigger.

Back under your bridge mate.

 

[Your]

What a pathetic response. Of course it means something.

Difference of 7.6 between the averages, thats HUGE.


Difference of 12.61 in Strike Rates, thats even Bigger.

Back under your bridge mate.

Come back to me when Tait proves himself at Internationsal level.

Clark is an excellent bowler.

 

[eddiesmith]

Tasmanian, well that ends the credibility of this thread

 

[spell_check]

I feel that Shaun Tait could be a risk for the Australians. Although he is fast, I fear that his erratic bowling, and tendecy to bowl really fast may be really expensive.

I have seen Tait before, and he does not impress me one bit. He is a dud, soon the selectors will realise this and start picking some real bowlers- like Stuart Clark.

Your an alias, surely.

Next!

 

[Your]

Your an alias, surely.

Next!

No.

Next!

 

[Your]

Tasmanian, well that ends the credibility of this thread

I actually live in Queensland, use to live in Tassie.

 

[NSWCROW]

As compared to the risk of taking 2 injured blokes and a bowling attack that looks toothless ATM ????

 

[Your]

As compared to the risk of taking 2 injured blokes and a bowling attack that looks toothless ATM ????

Didn't say anything about those injuries.

This is about Tait and the gamble the selectors are taking.

 

[eddiesmith]

I actually live in Queensland, use to live in Tassie.

Ouch, a real lethal combination

 

[Your]

Ouch, a real lethal combination

Not as leathal as a Victorian.

 

[ManWithNoName]

Come back to me when Tait proves himself at Internationsal level.

Clark is an excellent bowler.

Come back to me when Clark proves himself at ODI level.

Tait is an excellent prospect for the future.

 

[Grimreepah]

I feel that Shaun Tait could be a risk for the Australians. Although he is fast, I fear that his erratic bowling, and tendecy to bowl really fast may be really expensive.

I have seen Tait before, and he does not impress me one bit. He is a dud, soon the selectors will realise this and start picking some real bowlers- like Stuart Clark.

I like the way you make 'bowling really fast' sound like a fault.

Can mods move cricket threads to Bay13?

 

[The_Reaper]

and stuart clark has proven himself ast ODI level

Tait has the best strike rate of any bowler to have taken more than 30 wickets in the Australian domestic OD comp ever

Thats good enough to ge selected in my book

 

[NSWCROW]

Didn't say anything about those injuries.

This is about Tait and the gamble the selectors are taking.

So is that a yes or a no ??

 

[likka]

I feel that Shaun Tait could be a risk for the Australians. Although he is fast, I fear that his erratic bowling, and tendecy to bowl really fast may be really expensive.

Are you the Oracle?

 

[Corrosion]

and stuart clark has proven himself ast ODI level

Tait has the best strike rate of any bowler to have taken more than 30 wickets in the Australian domestic OD comp ever

Thats good enough to ge selected in my book

Domestic competition and International Competition are completely different.

Also, who was comparing Clark's strike rate, to Tait's? Of course Tait's is better, he has played two games, FFS!

 

[bus24]

Domestic competition and International Competition are completely different.

Also, who was comparing Clark's strike rate, to Tait's? Of course Tait's is better, he has played two games, FFS!

I included, Strike Rate at Domestic level.