-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Traded Jack Watts [traded to Port Adelaide]
- Thread starter crowsfan2017
- Start date
- Tagged users None
ThePuppetMaster
Yay
I got a different angle
Realistic head size too!
ThePuppetMaster
Yay
Not for us.
- Jun 30, 2015
- 552
- 1,116
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Think Watts needs to go to a club that's playing finals. He'd just end up a scapegoat for any struggling side.
- Sep 26, 2012
- 36,378
- 56,217
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Worth a pick in the 50's
- Banned
- #231
Let me guess. 2 1st rounders?
- Jun 9, 2009
- 1,373
- 1,925
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- The Indomitable Lions
Clearly, your coach & captain think otherwise.
- Sep 26, 2012
- 36,378
- 56,217
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Could be a deadly duo with Mayne if we get him
I don't really like Jack Watts. But Marshall our future forward is 2-3 years from making a big impact. Watts would help until then. At least he can kick straight.
In saying that wouldn't want to pay overs... Sounds like Melb's want him to go, surely that lowers his value!?!?!
In saying that wouldn't want to pay overs... Sounds like Melb's want him to go, surely that lowers his value!?!?!
- Jul 13, 2012
- 43,675
- 21,198
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Charlotte Hornets, Chelsea, Striker
Watts would definitely fit port. They really miss a genuine 2nd forward as a foil for Dixon.
That would allow the hoff to play his more natural role up the field, or sweeping back when required.
That would allow the hoff to play his more natural role up the field, or sweeping back when required.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,813
- 70,171
- AFL Club
- West Coast
If Watts is going to be of any value to a decent side he needs to play like Tom Lynch from the Crows.
If he goes to Port and they play him as a 'second forward' inside 50 he'll be shit.
If he goes to Port and they play him as a 'second forward' inside 50 he'll be shit.
Muzzaraki
Debutant
- May 23, 2016
- 111
- 200
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
He played 2nd forward since 2016 (with stints in the ruck) and has been superb. But do agree that he could play a Tom Lynch role but would prefer he does it with us.
ThePuppetMaster
Yay
29 alone should be enough IMO.
Dees want cap relief for Lever and for their impressive list of young talent, and don't want to risk losing a young gun in the next year or so due to cap issues.
Watts is highly dispensable.
Smart to offload now in my opinion.
- Banned
- #241
we'll get back to you.
We don't need cap relief at all.
Muzzaraki
Debutant
- May 23, 2016
- 111
- 200
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Well, obviously his contested game is weak but he went up a level playing consistently as a key forward. But yeah, probably need to get Pederson/McDonald in the role to play Watts as the roaming 3rd tall
- Oct 16, 2015
- 24,279
- 30,559
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Jack Darling?
- Oct 16, 2015
- 24,279
- 30,559
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
So crows or port for watts?
- Apr 12, 2014
- 32,161
- 57,016
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Crows have no use for him, Tom Lynch is a similar player but a much better version.
29 + Aaron Young
IIRC Young kicked 38 goals last year so the talent is there. Could be of great use to Melbourne should they lose Watts and get Young right
IIRC Young kicked 38 goals last year so the talent is there. Could be of great use to Melbourne should they lose Watts and get Young right
People saying pick 29 have NFI, this draft is rubbish and Watts is worth closer to pick 10 at least although I grant we won't get that.
Definitely worth a top 15 pick this year. He is being underrated and I wouldn't trade him personally.
Definitely worth a top 15 pick this year. He is being underrated and I wouldn't trade him personally.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,813
- 70,171
- AFL Club
- West Coast
LeverPuller
BigFooty Tanker
- Jun 23, 2011
- 35,112
- 40,635
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Newcastle United Seattle Seahawks
Have heard both North and Hawthorn are keen.
Similar threads
