Matt Rendell...

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah the football media in this country just gets worse and worse, they are in such a hurry to sensationalise and create a scandal out of a situation that they quite often overlook the facts either deliberately or through lack of research.

You only have to look at the media's disgraceful behaviour during the Kim Duthie saga of a year or so ago. The media were quick to vilify St Kilda and it's players based on Duthie's version of events without actually researching the facts, then when it subsequently came out that it was all lies they quickly washed their hands of it and didn't apologise for all the mud they had thrown at St Kilda and it's players.

The same thing has happened in the Rendell case with the media jumping to conclusions and insinuating that Rendell is racist based on one out of text comment without actually researching the true context of his comments and the real issue he was trying to address with the drafting of indigenous players. Of course now that he has been sacked and his reputation sullied there won't be a word of an apology from the media, in fact morons like Caroline Wilson have the audacity to suggest that Rendell still owes them and everyone else an apology. It's laughable.

On top of that Demetriou, who chastised the media for not showing due diligence when reporting on the Duthie saga, is equally as guilty as the media in this instance of jumping to conclusions without researching the facts. I'm guessing we won't be hearing an apology from him or the AFL either for the treatment of Rendell, they will just try to deflect and sweep the issue under the carpet like they do with everything else that makes them look bad.

well said :thumbsu:

If anything, Wilson owes Rendell an apology after last night. Vlad of course is never wrong.
 
So let me get this straight.

A man allegedly attacks and stabs his cousin with a machette and gets support and understanding from the AFL.

A man allegedly makes a comment in a private conversation that allegedly if taken out of context could be considered racist - AFL demands his resignation.

What a world we live in.
Exactly what I was thinking. Baffling and seemingly ridiculous. :confused:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: Matt Rendall...

The assumption is that is a bad thing that there is large attrition rate on indigenous kids. (I am not convinced the attrition rate is higher than for non-indigenous recruits but that is another matter). Really, the kids that leave by their own wishes probably think it is great they have just escaped from a gulag and can now just going back to playing footy for fun.
 
Re: Matt Rendall...

Robbo was already suspect on Vlad and the AFL, and that was an hour before both On the Couch and Footy Classified.

Should be interesting on AFL 360 tonight.

Interesting??? Yeah right.

Don't expect Robbo to take this issue up to Demetriou. No way Jose!
He'll just write up what we already know that MR is the scapegoat to a flawed recruiting process that hasn't been thoroughly been investigated by the league and that's why the retention number is dropping. Whether Robbo dares to emphasis that Demetriou has his head in the sand regards to what MR's concerns are, are another matter altogether that won't get touched now.

Demetriou rules the roost whether you like or not. Just keep working people, pay your subscriptions to the AFL and let this blow over. End of story.

Great post by Plugger35 (post425). AFL media = shameless pathetic.
 
Re: Matt Rendall...

The assumption is that is a bad thing that there is large attrition rate on indigenous kids. (I am not convinced the attrition rate is higher than for non-indigenous recruits but that is another matter). Really, the kids that leave by their own wishes probably think it is great they have just escaped from a gulag and can now just going back to playing footy for fun.


No shit sherlock... thats half the point.
 
Rendell: *Spends 15 minutes explaining comments, why he made them and the context of the original conversation*

Wilson: Well you still haven't explained why you made the silly comment in the first place.
 
Re: Matt Rendall...

I can't be bothered with you all now. I just now know how Tony Abbott gets so many votes.

Bigger picture people, bigger picture.

Wasn't Rendall looking at the bigger picture when he used an admittedly extreme EXAMPLE of what COULD happen in the future if things continue the way that they have.

Too many posters trying to look opinionated for the sake of looking opinionated.
 
Re: Matt Rendall...

This Im not so sure on. The Crows have been pretty reactive with the odd incident lately, and while even Demetriou says he spoke to Trigg, its just as likely that the Crows opted to fire him so they didnt look like idiots

The most powerful form of influence is one that doesn't need to be made explicit...it is simply 'understood' by those it affects (in this case Trigg/AFC) and acted upon as if a direct order had been given.
 
Re: Matt Rendall...

The most powerful form of influence is one that doesn't need to be made explicit...it is simply 'understood' by those it affects (in this case Trigg/AFC) and acted upon as if a direct order had been given.


AFC have had a couple of good weeks on the field and an absolute shocker off it. I don't mean Vince or Rendell either, but more so the admin's weak willed dealings with both issues. What ever happened to standing by your man? In my eyes both did virtually nothing wrong, yet on both occassions the Crows heirachy have bowed to either percieved public/media pressure or worse Vlad's pressure without it seems knowing the full story. This not a dig at the Crows for the sake of it, I just think if the shoe was on my foot and it was my club, I'd be livid with them. On both occassions they should have got all the facts and then told everyone politely to **** off.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Rendell: *Spends 15 minutes explaining comments, why he made them and the context of the original conversation*

Wilson: Well you still haven't explained why you made the silly comment in the first place.

This.....

I couldn't believe it at the time....it said to me that her mind was well and truly made up, even before she'd heard his version of events....a mistake many seem to have made in recent days. :mad:
 
Re: Matt Rendall...

AFC have had a couple of good weeks on the field and an absolute shocker off it. I don't mean Vince or Rendell either, but more so the admin's weak willed dealings with both issues. What ever happened to standing by your man? In my eyes both did virtually nothing wrong, yet on both occassions the Crows heirachy have bowed to either percieved public/media pressure or worse Vlad's pressure without it seems knowing the full story. This not a dig at the Crows for the sake of it, I just think if the shoe was on my foot and it was my club, I'd be livid with them. On both occassions they should have got all the facts and then told everyone politely to **** off.

Agreed - :thumbsu::thumbsu:

Very disapointed in my clubs reactions to the latest incidents.
 
Re: Matt Rendall...

Jesus Christ, there is some pretty appalling chest-beating going on in this thread right now. Let's just get some clarity here, shall we?:

1) Matt Rendell probably didn't have any malicious intent when he said what he did. His life has been completely upended as a consequence of a "throw-away line" and he deserves some sympathy for this. Racism is a problem in this country, but a torch and pitchfork mentality won't solve anything. Whatever misdeed he committed he has already paid for 1000 times over and any further public obloquy is pretty much redundant.

2) Given that, what he said was unacceptable and cannot be rationalised away by invoking the spectre of over-reaching political correctness. He was a man employed to assess the footballing talents of teenage boys and he insinuated (and failed to retract the statement) that white parents are fitter parents than indigenous parents. You're being wilfully blind if you can't recongise the latent bigotry in that. I don't believe he has been strongly misrepresented on this point, either: his "solution" on Footy Classified that indigenous boys should be taken away from their communities and put into urban schools for the sake of their football smacks of the racial paternalism (well-meaning though it may well be) that has blighted relations between our two communities since the point of first contact. It is not for him to decide what is best for the indigenous people.

3) Andrew Demetriou wasn't involved, and the conspiracy theories that are dredged-up on this site every time his name is mentioned are becoming tiresome. Adelaide may or may not have been correct to sack Rendell: I think the solution was - to say the least - "harsh", but it was a decision completely within their own power to make. Nothing Rendell said in that interview contradicts this, or implies the involvement of a power beyond that of the president of the Adelaide FC. You can't just presume the involvement of the big, bad AFL every time something happens in this sport that you just happen to disagree with. They're businessmen, not sub-Arctic base-dwelling super-villains.

Is that you andrew??you're very naive if you think andrew demetriou had nothing to do with this. Heres how it goes..

"Andrew this rendall guy is hitting a little too close to home,our secret about aboriginals dropping out of the system and us not doing anything about it might get out"

Demetriou-"what was that comment he made about one white parent??maybe we can get him for that mwahahahahaa"

demetriou to adelaide.."look if you dont sack rendall im taking away all adelaides money,and other priveleges."

adelaide "ok mr demetriou whatever u say".

Thats HOW IT WENT DOWN.Like adrian anderson on andrew demetriou. It was always gonna happen.
 
I think Rendell deserves this to all be out in the open given what he has gone through.

Firstly we need to hear from Misfud and see if he can confirm what Rendell said on Footy Classified is true.

Then a massive explanation from Demetriou and Trigg as to why they unfairly treated Rendell the way they did.
 
I think the AFL will find that Mifsud's position is also now untenable. Well, you would think having a trusting relationship with recruiters and other club personnel would be essential for his role.

So in walks Mifsub to your club and asks how are things: mmm - "yeah good mate no problems!"

I think there will be a few influential AFL figures who have now had enough of AD's pontificating. His conceit seems to be growing exponentially on a daily basis. His job is to run the AFL not to advertise his credentials for the labour party preselection.

That Matt Rendell had to go through what he has is quite simply unforgivable. The game is not there for Andrew's cultural crusades, it is not there to conduct witch hunts. It is not there for Caro and Pat Smith to salivate over their now predictable post modern witch hunts.

Anyone with Rendell's contribution deserves at least some chance, some consideration. The tolerance shown to Jurrah's machettie weaving is owed to all of us.
 
"Alleged" machete (or axe) weaving. Otherwise a good post.

As for those who think that Rendell was suggesting that by saying what he did (to get Misfud to realise what could happen if nothing was done about the situation) that those with one "white parent" and one "indigenous parent" are "superior" than those with two of the latter, he was not implying that at all. He was simply implying that they would likely have a better chance of handling big city life and all the structures and so on that are in place in an AFL club, because at least one of the parents would most likely have a good understanding and experience of living that way.

Just like how someone who had one indigenous parent and one "white" parent would be more likely to be able to handle the opposite move, from the big city to a remote indigenous community, than someone who had two "white" parents, who only know about living in a city/suburban environment.
 
Firstly we need to hear from Misfud and see if he can confirm what Rendell said on Footy Classified is true.

Then a massive explanation from Demetriou and Trigg as to why they unfairly treated Rendell the way they did.

Why would the AFL do that?

They have established a company line;

Rendell made inappropriate comments
They were brought to AD's attention, he in turn contacted Adelaide
Adelaide raised the matter with Rendell, he chose to resign
AFL is committed to an extremely strong anti-racism policy and have established numerous programs to assist indigenous youth.

End of discussion.

The AFL has nothing to gain by allowing questioning of Mifsud, the 3rd person or indeed of Trigg.

I would think Anderson & Demetriou are the only people likely to be heard on this issue and they will follow the company line I've suggested above.

Presenting anyone else for scrutiny would only allow questions to be asked regarding the 'official' version and that is something the AFL would seek to avoid.
 
People should be very careful saying things in a joking way that they don't mean. Those who had been their friends, but when they feel they have a grievance, would take those words out of context and use them as weapons. Happened to me when I joked about one of the Inspectors would get promoted. The other guy went to my boss, and to cut a long story short, all sorts of stories came out and my career was affected.

Over the years, since then, I am now learning that keeping my moth shut is often better than voicing an honest opinion which could be misconstrued. Obviously, Rendell didn't say what he was accused of, and certain people used the occasion to make themselves look like virtuous humanitarian heroes at his expense. Sorry he had to lose his job, and that his reputation suffered.
 
I think Rendell deserves this to all be out in the open given what he has gone through.

Firstly we need to hear from Misfud and see if he can confirm what Rendell said on Footy Classified is true.

Then a massive explanation from Demetriou and Trigg as to why they unfairly treated Rendell the way they did.

You really think Demetriou would explain anything? After all, he considers himself the Pope of the AFL and he is Infallible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top