Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Ben Cousins never got charged with anything and he was sacked and delisted.
take your one-eyed blinkers off people.
what Patrick is saying about Pratt is true. He has been found guilty of the biggest price fixing cartel in our history.
700 Million dollars of OUR money he and his mates stole.
If Pratt is allowed to get away with this by Carlton and the AFL, how can they possibly punish anyone for a wrong doing?
If Pratt is allowed to remain, then it is open slather.
Anything is allowed.
As a lifelong Carlton supporter i would state the above if Pratt was President of Carlton or Collingwood or Sydney or whoever.
What he did was not trivial. He should go.
700 Million dollars of OUR money he and his mates stole.
I would appreciate you providing documented proof that an amount of 700 million dollars was stolen.mate u are wasting your time with this mob. according to them a little 700 million dollars worth of price fixing is no big deal - as long as he is doing a good job at Carlton.
So, do you think we should give the money back he has so far given to the club because it's (by your opinion) tainted. Or are you willing to accept all that and then just ask Dick to leave?
What about all the good he has done since being President, shall we also forget all that as well?
Dick Pratt has put years of love, work and money into this club. Not just in the past 12 months or so, but a lifetime of it.
Any amount of price-fixing is wrong, but you should be wary of bandying the $700M figure. It's an guesstimate from a lawyer, it's shared between Visy and Amcor, and who knows what percentage each is liable for? I wouldn't assume 50/50.mate u are wasting your time with this mob. according to them a little 700 million dollars worth of price fixing is no big deal - as long as he is doing a good job at Carlton.
Our first comparison of Pratt to Chopper Reid.It is not just a matter for the courts and thats the end of it. By that logic, you could have Carey or Ablett as your President. By that logic, you could have Vizard as president. By that logic, you could have Chopper Reid as president.
take your one-eyed blinkers off people.
what Patrick is saying about Pratt is true. He has been found guilty of the biggest price fixing cartel in our history.
700 Million dollars of OUR money he and his mates stole.
If Pratt is allowed to get away with this by Carlton and the AFL, how can they possibly punish anyone for a wrong doing?
If Pratt is allowed to remain, then it is open slather.
Anything is allowed.
As a lifelong Carlton supporter i would state the above if Pratt was President of Carlton or Collingwood or Sydney or whoever.
What he did was not trivial. He should go.
mate u are wasting your time with this mob. according to them a little 700 million dollars worth of price fixing is no big deal - as long as he is doing a good job at Carlton.
Going by that logic it wouldn't matter if the prime minister was completely crooked as long as he was running the country well.
Our first comparison of Pratt to Chopper Reid.
You are officially a ****wit.
Read what i said properly.
Your response to nutcase888 showed intelligence and thought.
this one didn't.
Dramoth,
lol
nice tirade
oh dear............
Let's get one thing straight, Pratt/Visy did not steal $700m of anyone's money. This is just a figure plucked out of the air by those thieving hyenas at Slater & Gordon when they were trying to drum some reward based business called a "class action" for people that were supposedly disadvantaged by the Visy/Amcor action.
Have a look at what Pratt said and, what has not been disproved - Amcor approached Visy about a price arrangement because they were being slaughtered by Visy in the market. Visy agreed and then went on doing exactly what they had been doing, undercutting Amcor's price. Pratt's testimony (again not challenged) was that prices actually fell or did not rise as much as they would have during this period because of Visy's aggressive market approach.
Also, if those hyenas at Slater & Gordron had such a wonderful case, then why haven't they proceeded with a class action. That is because there is nothing for them to chase.
Finally, why did Amcor get off scott free just because they were caught with their hand in the till and rolled over and put their legs in the air. The fact of the matter is that Pratt and Samuel have some history and Samuel has been waiting for some time to have a crack at DP.
He finally found something that he could go to the papers with and Pratt accepted that that had done the wrong thing (in principle) and copped a wack. Since then Samuel has been running around saying "look at me look at me aren't I wonderful" when he actually did bugger all other than work on the paperwork provide by Amcor.
As an Investatigive Organisation the ACCC is a joke and so is Samuel.
It's on this argument that people like Fatprick have been carrying on about DP without ever bothering to check the facts.
Finally, Visy accepted that they had done the wrong thing, copped a fine and have moved on. So should Smith and everybody else.
Blind parochialism is something that has always intrigued me and something i will never understand.
*Some* carlton supporters will defend Pratt till the death no matter what he did because....he is OURS
its like *some* Indians will support Harbijan till the death because...he is OURS
its like *some* Americans will support Bush till the death because...he is OURS.
people should be treated on their merits and actions , irrespective of parochialism.
Pratt has been terrific for Carlton.
BUT
What he did was reprehensible and the AFL should not tolerate him as one of its 16 presidents.
It is the people's game. The same people Pratt defrauded.
People are so ignorant and apathetic of white collar crime. If he held up a bank for $200,000 i wonder if peoples reactions would be different.
So where is the proof regarding your statement that Pratt and his mates stole $700 million?Blind parochialism is something that has always intrigued me and something i will never understand.
*Some* carlton supporters will defend Pratt till the death no matter what he did because....he is OURS
its like *some* Indians will support Harbijan till the death because...he is OURS
its like *some* Americans will support Bush till the death because...he is OURS.
people should be treated on their merits and actions , irrespective of parochialism.
Pratt has been terrific for Carlton.
BUT
What he did was reprehensible and the AFL should not tolerate him as one of its 16 presidents.
It is the people's game. The same people Pratt defrauded.
People are so ignorant and apathetic of white collar crime. If he held up a bank for $200,000 i wonder if peoples reactions would be different.
As President he sets the example. Simple fact of life.
It is not just a matter for the courts and thats the end of it. By that logic, you could have Carey or Ablett as your President. By that logic, you could have Vizard as president. By that logic, you could have Chopper Reid as president.
You can have all the gratitude you like for what Pratt has done for Carlton but the simple fact of life is he has been found guilty of the biggest cartel in our history. And contrary to the case made a few posts back , that IS stealing OUR money....and in massive quantitys.
I state again, if Pratt is allowed to go unpunished at the football level, then it is open slather. You cannot punish ANYBODY. If that is the precedent the AFL or Carlton want to set, then fine. If not, then he must GO.
simple.
I am sure that if it was someone of a lesser stature, like Rod Butterrs or Ray Horsburgh etc, they would be long gone.
Pratt has done a lot of good for Carlton, but what he did was inexcuseable and he should GO.
Now.
So where is the proof regarding your statement that Pratt and his mates stole $700 million?
So you state something as fact and then when challenged can't back it up. What a surprise.Sherb,
the proof of his guilt is in his guilty plea.
lets not get into semantics about how many hundreds of millions of dollars he illegally skimmed.
400?...500?...600?....700?....a billion