You win some you lose some. Havent seen it yet but sounds interesting to say the least.
Maybe this is footy Karma for the Hawkins incident in the GF last year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You win some you lose some. Havent seen it yet but sounds interesting to say the least.
Or in St Kilda's case: The umps give you a prelim one year, a QF the next...You win some you lose some. Havent seen it yet but sounds interesting to say the least.
Bit rough to say the saints didn't deserve to win it due to a free kick that was marginal going to them. What about the goal Dawson tapped through or Stokes soft as free kick that he scored a goal from.
Sounds like there would've been less of an uproar by St Kilda fans, had it not been paid.
Fair call?
Definitely.Sounds like there would've been less of an uproar by St Kilda fans, had it not been paid.
Fair call?
More surprising to me was how Mooney got away without a 50m called against him.
Heard Cam tell the umpire that he "...cost them (cats) the game."
Just saw the free kick, and apologies to Cats' fans, but it was there.
Unfortunately, it was there.
Geelong supporters and others should not complain.There were atleast 3 bullshit free kicks payed to geelong for high,WHICH WERE SOFT AS ****.Johnson kicked a goal and stokes a point so geelong supporters stfu and cop the loss stop whinging u lucked out last yr in the grand final and now it has bitten u back.
That ump had money on the Saints. Terrible decision given the conditions, no feel for the game whatsoever.
But they clearly do.Rule don't change because of the conditions, the rules are rules wet or dry.