- Dec 19, 2015
- 2,413
- 4,685
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Hoyne is very irritating the way he speaks. I don't mind some stats and they can provide fodder, but I hate the way he speaks as if his stats are the undeniable truth. Last week Nick Daicos was 231st for ball use and it was stated along the lines... "him winning more of the ball comes at a cost, if you want his efficiency he can't be an inside midfielder etc"Champion Data's rankings are close to the biggest load of BS in football.
Compiying stats and selling them to consumers is the only thing they're good at.
When it comes to making judgement & subjective calls based on raw data (ie: their ranking systems), they are so for off the mark it's not funny.
I seriously doubt Hoyne has watched too many games of football. He simply runs his numbers through an algorithm and thinks he's some sort of football guru.
Champion data had Daniel Menzel ranked as an elite player in the year we delisted him (2018?), yet Joel Selwood wasn't. Laughable.
As well as Holmes has been playing of late, how he could be rated above Daicos or Warner (2 players off the top of my head) is also laughable.
Wha? everyone knows if you're winning more ball under pressure you're not going to be as effective but Daicos is elite, whatever the circumstances are you want him winning the ball. His 231st ranking was across a period where he earnt 39 of a possible 40 coaches votes.
This week "Daicos played the best game of anyone this year, noone has had more impact with ball use". Well blow me down. Funnily enough the coaches didn't even rate him the best player in this game.