Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 12
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
l think this will happen against the DeesScott keeps promising the Hawkins-Cameron-Neale combo at some point.
But is that just to keep his counterpart coaches on their toes?
I can't say the idea appeals to me that much. Hawkins is not 100% at the moment and you've got O Henry playing like a key position, so the balance of the forwardline just seems to me you either play Hawkins or Neale, but not both.
I thought the beauty of Stengle's game last week was that he did it without really feeding off the crumbs of our key forwards too much.
People will say it wasn't a night for key forwards but I actually disagree. They usually become pivotal structurally in the wet even if it's harder for them to be on the end of the scoring chain.
So for me, I don't think the answer is to go taller in dry conditions. Gotta just create the space in the f50 to make it even easier for guys like Tyson to hurt them where there might be a tiny bit of a weakness for them.
Should be a fascinating encounter.
Yes. SDK to whichever sits deepest (presumably Curnow), Kolo to McKay. If De Koning drops back, then Plan A is Jack Henry, with team defensive structure to cut across and not allow a one-v-one. If De Koning gets on the end of a couple, Blicavs or O'Sullivan are other options.So do you have a thought on handling the the Carlton trio of tall forwards?
I think we'll see Hardie first, just on the grounds of Poor Bloke Deserves A Go.Meat Tray
IN: Stanley, Tuohy, Knevitt.
OUT: Conway, Stewart, Clark.
SUB: Knevitt
Yes. SDK to whichever sits deepest (presumably Curnow), Kolo to McKay. If De Koning drops back, then Plan A is Jack Henry, with team defensive structure to cut across and not allow a one-v-one. If De Koning gets on the end of a couple, Blicavs or O'Sullivan are other options.
Playing too many tall forwards can also be a trap. The vast majority of entries inside 50 do not result in contested marks; they usually result in ground balls, and mobility is king on the way out.
I think we'll see Hardie first, just on the grounds of Poor Bloke Deserves A Go.
I'd like to see him come in for Clark. Clark has had a good run and will be back in through injury, suspension, form soon enough.I think we'll see Hardie first, just on the grounds of Poor Bloke Deserves A Go.
Fair point. But Neale plays primarily forward, so I don't know that it helps with nullifying Gawn too much.l think this will happen against the Dees
neale to help combat Max
It's not necessarily about height, though. Agree with Guthrie into Stewart.Charlie Curnow - 194cm
Harry McKay - 200cm
Jake Kolodjashnij - 195cm
Sam DeKoning - 204cm
The match ups are obvious imo. Zach Guthrie to take Stewart's intercepting role.
Just to expand on this. Scott said at the beginning of the year that Clark had a specific role within the team that he was most suited to. I believe that Parfitt has gone well past Clark in this role making him somewhat redundant for the time being.I'd like to see him come in for Clark. Clark has had a good run and will be back in through injury, suspension, form soon enough.
Hardie deserves his crack in my opinion.
Agreed I have slightly differing heights off AFL tables but match ups remain the same,what are you doing with Tom De Koning who will start forward also 203cm do we play Sam on him and hope Harry McKay has a shit day with the boot AFL table has him at 204cm as well.Charlie Curnow - 194cm
Harry McKay - 200cm
Jake Kolodjashnij - 195cm
Sam DeKoning - 204cm
The match ups are obvious imo. Zach Guthrie to take Stewart's intercepting role.
Yeah, but I think we already have Blitz for that. We'd trying to chase a marginal advantage by creating a ground level disadvantageIt's not something I'd normally endorse but taking a lesson from the Blues Giants game with Pittonet back in the ruck freeing Tom De Koning to go forward we need to be able to counter a formattable trio in McKey 204/99 Tom De Koning 203/97 and of cause Curnow, without Stewart we look completely out gunned this week in the air down back.
Two or three weeks of being the Big Dog in the VFL side would do that young man no harm whatsoeverJust to expand on this. Scott said at the beginning of the year that Clark had a specific role within the team that he was most suited to. I believe that Parfitt has gone well past Clark in this role making him somewhat redundant for the time being.
Yes but we need another solid ruck to go up against him when Stanley has a break and l would prefer to let blitz play other rolesFair point. But Neale plays primarily forward, so I don't know that it helps with nullifying Gawn too much.
It's not necessarily about height, though. Agree with Guthrie into Stewart.
That is a pretty good meat tray and I would like the invited to the bbqLast week's game v Brisbane was a slog. The VFL game had basically no rain. I can see us bringing in fresh legs, any of Stanley Tuohy, Hardie, Knevitt, O'Sullivan, Bews, Rohan, Clohesy, Mannagh, even Humphries. We wouldn't be giving anything away bringing any of these guys in.
Feels like Stanely and Tuohy are definite ins. Conway and Stewart are definite outs. Not sure who else gets a spell, maybe Duncan though he already missed round 2. At the other end of the age spectrum, Clark could use a full game in the VFL.
Meat Tray
IN: Stanley, Tuohy, Knevitt.
OUT: Conway, Stewart, Clark.
SUB: Knevitt
kolo on curnow?Charlie Curnow - 194cm
Harry McKay - 200cm
Jake Kolodjashnij - 195cm
Sam DeKoning - 204cm
The match ups are obvious imo. Zach Guthrie to take Stewart's intercepting role.
The only real way to defend against 2x Coleman medallists forward is through the midfield.Charlie Curnow - 194cm
Harry McKay - 200cm
Jake Kolodjashnij - 195cm
Sam DeKoning - 204cm
The match ups are obvious imo. Zach Guthrie to take Stewart's intercepting role.
Because SDK is more comfortable than Kolo on the last line of defence. Kolo is better at reading the game further up the front and creating 2v1 contests.Why make Kolo give away 5cm when he doesn't have to?