Original Moody Blue
Cancelled
- Nov 14, 2020
- 1,166
- 1,496
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Don't have that luxury now.Why only 8? Sticks played 136 games games in the SANFL before joining Carlton, didn't do him any harm!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Don't have that luxury now.Why only 8? Sticks played 136 games games in the SANFL before joining Carlton, didn't do him any harm!
12% of our salary cap.All this focus on Harry is so unfortunate.. just imagine a fit Charlie standing right next to him..
Lets all prey to god that he he comes good like Doc.
Really owes us12% of our salary cap.
He'll stay in.Hey guys, is Parks a good chance to stay in or do you think he comes out? Need him for cover in fantasy this week lol
8 games?! Why would he be held to a different standard than anyone else, particularly a 100% guaranteed best 22 player? How many reserves games did Doc have to play to prove his body could stand up to the rigors of AFL?
Her- I bet he's thinking of other women
Bluemahogany- Just imagine a fit Charlie playing along side HarryView attachment 1120507
Don't expect me to cure world hunger if I get a free wishHer- I bet he's thinking of other women
Bluemahogany- Just imagine a fit Charlie playing along side HarryView attachment 1120507
Hey guys, is Parks a good chance to stay in or do you think he comes out? Need him for cover in fantasy this week lol
T-shirts please
12% of our salary cap.
If he's dropped, make sure you come back here for the melts.Hey guys, is Parks a good chance to stay in or do you think he comes out? Need him for cover in fantasy this week lol
Hey guys, is Parks a good chance to stay in or do you think he comes out? Need him for cover in fantasy this week lol
The Pies did it to Plow also.
How do we let this happen?
Teague has had enough time to have a plan to combat this tactic.
And he started a blue!Really? Owies kicked 3, laid tackles in the F50, and crucially, also ran all the way to FB to lay a tackle. Murph would never have done the defensive things.
If he's dropped, make sure you come back here for the melts.
We'll be losing our sh*t in here.
TDK in, Murphy subEvidence?
Stepping in for plow here... Evidence?TDK in, Murphy sub
Superb visionThis is going to be an interesting one, because we match up really well against them. Their mids aren't the 'smash it wide' style that Cripps struggles against, so expect him to go a bit better. They have weird lapses which can last whole games, and they had one last week; in the past, those lapses have consumed months before, and there's been precious little to explain what prompted them or caused the team to switch back on again.
See, I think the big wins we've had against them have not come against them when they're switched on; rather, we've got them at a good time. I really don't know for certain what we're going in against this week; could be that last week was the beginning of a lapse that will last a month, and we're going to hit them fairly hard, or it could be that they're a better side now and those lapses have gone the way of the dodo. The funny thing is that everything they've shown this year is completely within the bounds of the expected from them; we've known they can play footy this way for a while now, and the only unexpected part of this was Bruce's 10 in round 3. What would be unexpected for them is if they can sustain this level for longer than 10 weeks.
I back this to be close, but it would take one of two things for us to win: one, Cripps plays well. I'm talking, he drags us over the line himself. He has enough clearances to top the Dogs himself, he kicks 3-4 goals (not from set shots, or he'll need 10 of them to get there) and his contribution will mean that Walsh can just be amazing beside him. They spend all game kicking it to Jones and Weitering, and their rebounders - JJ and Daniels - keep getting pressured into mistakes. Weitering blankets Norton while Jones plays off Bruce, and Doc and Saad both rebound to their heart's content. We win the time in possession count, and the contested possession count.
The other way we win is if they're off. Their good players play poorly - not Bont, because he's pretty consistent. They rely on others to be win/loss - and their poor players just keep giving the ball back. Bruce keeps missing the ball. Norton keeps missing the goals. Easton Wood pretends the ball's a magnet and he can't get the polarity right.
I can't pick us to win, but gee it'd be pretty fun if we did.
Well the sub isn’t announced until an hour before the bounce, so at least half of that is a guessStepping in for plow here... Evidence?