He was good, I hate the efficiency stat though. If you kick it to a contest it's regarded as an efficient disposal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He was good, I hate the efficiency stat though. If you kick it to a contest it's regarded as an efficient disposal
Only if it is 40m to or moreHe was good, I hate the efficiency stat though. If you kick it to a contest it's regarded as an efficient disposal
not a sook, an observation. Enjoy your dimmies...
We are appealing its a deadset joke, and if we don’t well few letters will be made to JeffThe Worpel “incident” is no longer on that shitty AFL website as far as I can see.
Naturally they don‘t show it on the afl.com website press release.
Perfect tackle IMO, held the guy’s arm, brought him down and did not sling him at all.
Should have been incorrect disposal.
What a farce the game has become. If nothing else, we have to appeal this for the good of the game.
Hayward and Morris banged heads. It had nothing to do with Jaeger.Jon Ralph comparing the Hunter Clark to Hayward now
Exactly but he put on Twitter it wasn’t much different which is ridiculousHayward and Morris banged heads. It had nothing to do with Jaeger.
I'm a bit confused with the Worpel suspension.
Is the rule:
'If you choose to tackle and they get hurt, you are automatically suspended'?
I thought this suspension was to stop slinging players who had long disposed of the ball, but this doesn't look to fit that criteria.
" Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Careless Contact, Medium Impact, High Contact. The incident was classified as a one-match sanction as a first offence. The player can accept a one- match sanction with an early plea. "AFL Tribunal Guideline section 4.2(B) has been amended: “Any dangerous tackle” to replace references to “spear tackle” and “driving an opponent into the ground when his arms are pinned.”
AFL Tribunal Guideline section 4.3(E)(3) has been amended: The Player being tackled is in a vulnerable position (i.e. arm(s) pinned) with little opportunity to protect himself.
So any type of tackle deemed dangerous can lead to suspension. Worps is having second bye folks. More exposure to middle for Jai.
David Parkin Leigh Mathews Blight it has been done beforeThe problem with modern AFL commentary is that it is the domain of champion footballers without much going on upstairs. Those who have a bit more capacity upstairs go into other industries where they can exploit their wealth and connections to open doors . Or if they stay in football they go into administration or coaching.
Special comments and boundary riding is the lazy last resort for champion ex players who didn’t bother planning for life after footy. The real dregs end up doing gambling commercials like Nathan Brown.
The losers in this are the viewers who have to listen to morons every week. Networks would be better off getting ex coaches into commentary to explain tactics etc. Start with Bucks please (as he also ticks the champion player box for popularity points).
He was very good. There is massive focus on what he does badly but his work rate is close to the best in the side.What did people make of Phillips' game in this one?
I thought he had one of his better games for the club if not his best.
Agree by far the worst , last week
Darcy - Cox is incredible for a player nearly 200cm to be playing wing
3 minutes later
Darcy - Cox is incredible for a player of 201 cms on the wing
Poor kid is growing during the game
Yes, agree with that. Not only 2 goals, but his disposal was neat throughout and did the non-negotiables with his contested play.What did people make of Phillips' game in this one?
I thought he had one of his better games for the club if not his best.
Hahahahahahaha the umps can't even get 15 meters right, yet some stat guy in the stand can get 40m right LMFAO - this proves how useless most stats are.Only if it is 40m to or more
given our lack of depth at the position it's probably not too late for him to string some games together and earn another 1 yr dealVery good point about Ceglar so we’ll see if he can back it up. He was played like a a guy playing for his career last night and rightfully so because his career is at a crossroads.
What did people make of Phillips' game in this one?
I thought he had one of his better games for the club if not his best.
The standard has been set. Hopefully a lightbulb moment for the squad. It didn’t hurt we got several players back into the team either but you could see there was an intent that was missing in previous weeks. Our only four quarter performance of the year.This is what I was ranting about in the last thread. I’m so happy for Clarko, now wake up and keep it up.
Uhmm!!!Over the last decade of hawks vs swans clashes if you said the winning team loaded on inside mids, won by pressure/intent, closed down a quicker outside team and got a great run with the umps you’d be 99% talking about Sydney. Tables were turned.
Swans were flat and we were hot after a 10 day break - Clarko has been pinching these type of post bye games for years. Good to see a win and Jai crack in. A response that was needed after the gcs game. Still don’t think we’re developing enough kids but a debate for another thread.
Interesting month of footy ahead.