Round 14 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Why are you getting Stef martin? you have no ruck dpp in your rucks (thurlow ben brown type)
For me Martin is purely nice RUCK insurance if Sandi or nicnut get rested for a week
Long term I'm thinking ruck insurance, but I'll have to burn that extra trade to get rid of Currie to Brown/Thurlow. Am regretting not starting with either of these guys..
Or I can hope that Dan Currie gets another gig :rainbow::rainbow::rainbow:
There are bugger all rookie rucks available unfortunately, decisions decisions...

No mate. He's a fwd super-PREMO Will score 107 every week!
Compared to the rest of my forward line he is :D

UPDATE:
I just checked the injury list for Brissy
http://www.afl.com.au/news/injury-news/injury-list
Looneyburger is listed as 3-4 weeks. It was 6 weeks last week. It looks like he may be back sooner than first thought.

Looking at that I might hold for now, cheers lads
 
Higgins - Fyfe (Robbie Gray moved into fwd line)
Sam Lloyd - Stefan Martin [sic]

Next week: Derickx - Thurlow/Brown
 
rethought my trade plan and came up with this
team is now DONE with good cover, some possible loophole opportunities, 4 trades left, and 50k in the bank

Langford to McVeigh
Cameron to ParkerWingard

GqApL5o.jpg


thoughts?
 
Last edited:
rethought my trade plan and came up with this
team is now DONE with good cover, some possible loophole opportunities, 4 trades left, and 50k in the bank

Langford to McVeigh
Cameron to Parker

GqApL5o.jpg


thoughts?
I don't see Parker in that team
 
rethought my trade plan and came up with this
team is now DONE with good cover, some possible loophole opportunities, 4 trades left, and 50k in the bank

Langford to McVeigh
Cameron to Parker

GqApL5o.jpg


thoughts?

Did Parker morph into a Chad?
 
5 trades 206k bank

image.jpg image.jpg

Ambrose>Stefan?
Litherland>Hurn/Hanley/Hodge/Ibbo/Grimes?

Or

Ambrose>mid premo
Litherland>Grimes?

Thoughts/critiques/other left field ideas are welcomed. Cheers.
 
5 trades 206k bank

View attachment 62517 View attachment 62518

Ambrose>Stefan?
Litherland>Hurn/Hanley/Hodge/Ibbo/Grimes?

Or

Ambrose>mid premo
Litherland>Grimes?

Thoughts/critiques/other left field ideas are welcomed. Cheers.

One trade only

DEF: one of your D6/D7 to Ibbotson, Jaensch or Grimes

then wait for cows to fatten up
 
rethought my trade plan and came up with this
team is now DONE with good cover, some possible loophole opportunities, 4 trades left, and 50k in the bank

Langford to McVeigh
Cameron to Parker

GqApL5o.jpg


thoughts?
Looks like you went Cameron>Wingard.
Great final team with really strong dpp backup.
Exactly the sort of set up I was hoping for, but will probably fall just short of ... and with far fewer trades in reserve.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What's up with Breust? This week I've downgraded Jamar for a non-playing rookie so I could upgrade Bews to Hurn. I'm starting to wonder if I'm better off keeping Jamar as the ruck back-up for when Sandi gets rested / Martin makes way for Lewey (which seems like it will happen) and getting out Breust with his high B/E and current Spudliness for McGovern.

Thoughts?
 
I don't see Parker in that team
Did Parker morph into a Chad?
OOPS! I meant the Chad.
Since he's been effected by the JM curse, Wingard > Parker anyway :D

Looks like you went Cameron>Wingard.
Great final team with really strong dpp backup.
Exactly the sort of set up I was hoping for, but will probably fall just short of ... and with far fewer trades in reserve.
cheers mate! I like the look of it, just need my under performing players to lift
 
need some advice......
have a completed team with my worst players being higgins, r. murpghy and jaensch with 4 trades left which are for safety.
although i am very tempted to go higgins - wingard as my final non forced trade. higgins without his 4 100+ scores would have a fairly average 60 odd average. where as wingard has far bigger upside and with a 10 severely affecting his average. i have cover on every line and dont want to burn 2 trades trading down then up to get a full premo... thoughts??
 
Last edited:
Anyone not trading in s martin? Why?
just getting diff point of view

If you have 22 premo's on the field and a playing bench rookie on every line averaging 50-70 why waste a trade bringing Martin in? ...unless of course you believe that he is going to average 90+ based on 2 games. Personally, I won't be trading him in as I only have 6 trades left no point wasting a precious trade at this point sideways trading a benchie for him, even though potentially loopholing his scores of the forward bench is tempting, I don't believe it's in my teams long term best interest. Would rather sideways an under performing premo than making another downgrade. Which is what I would be doing if I traded him in.
 
At the moment I've gone:

Shenton> Fyfe
Ambrose> S.Martin

This leaves me 6 trades and not much cash with a team of:

scteam.PNG
In a few weeks when S.Mitch has dropped in value and Cutler has had a slight rise I will double trade Cutler and KK to J.Hunt and S.Mitch. This will open my D/F link and leave me with 100-150k to upgrade one of Cotch, Breust or Gunston to a mid premium on the eve of the finals and leave me with only 3 spare trades. Sound like a good plan?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top