Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I want to see the old collared jumpers tucked in and socks up!Wonder what the likelihood is of us wearing pour swooping magpie guernsey for retro round this week
It’s his leg speed I’m worried about. Nothing to do with the bicep.Pendles was playing good footy before the bicep injury. No one will convince me otherwise that he was not and is still not right from that injury.
He’s always been slow but it hasn’t stopped him. He was playing fine before the injury.It’s his leg speed I’m worried about. Nothing to do with the bicep.
Lippa didn’t attend a single centre bounce. He’s a part of the forward group that’s getting hung out to dry from lack of supply.True But when Lippa Pendles and Crisp get about 30 touches collectively for the night you know things are crook in Tullarook. It is like our midfield has concrete in their boots
He’s got quick hands. I’d put him at centre bounces to try and extract to Nick.Lippa didn’t attended a single centre bounce. He’s a part of the forward group that’s getting hung out to dry from lack of supply.
Sounds like a relegation battle soccer club tactic.Listening to Fly's presser, he seemed to be suggesting that we allowed Geelong to play uncontested mark to mark because they weren't getting anywhere by doing so. It seems like we are playing according to a theory that allowing some uncontested possession is Ok, as the opposition is not achieving anything by doing so if we position ourselves correctly. This might have a limited degree of truth, but clearly it needs to be balanced by front on pressure and man to man where necessary. It seems like we are not understanding the balance.
Hope you’re right.He’s always been slow but it hasn’t stopped him. He was playing fine before the injury.
ExactlyIt’s exasperating, isn’t it..
Listening to Fly's presser, he seemed to be suggesting that we allowed Geelong to play uncontested mark to mark because they weren't getting anywhere by doing so. It seems like we are playing according to a theory that allowing some uncontested possession is Ok, as the opposition is not achieving anything by doing so if we position ourselves correctly. This might have a limited degree of truth, but clearly it needs to be balanced by front on pressure and man to man where necessary. It seems like we are not understanding the balance.
What's your point?
You want a member to your 'everything is negative' gang?
I never said we were playing well.It's okay to admit that we are playing like shit.
Big difference between 40 minutes of VFL and playing in a virtual elimination final.They said McStay won’t play but Reckon he could
Our Season on the line now
Who is they?They said McStay won’t play but Reckon he could
Our Season on the line now
Sub? I know you may need a sub early, but maybe could play him as a sub to limit minutes.Big difference between 40 minutes of VFL and playing in a virtual elimination final.
That’s an argument for playing him just as much as not playing him.Big difference between 40 minutes of VFL and playing in a virtual elimination final.
I think Dave is referring to the VFL livestream commentatorsWho is they?
Ok so not worth rating their opinions thenI think Dave is referring to the VFL livestream commentators
The people in TD’s TVWho is they?
It’s only a problem if holding on to them didn’t result in a premiership. But it did…. and those two in particular were integral to that when it mattered
Steele still easily best 22 and has another year in him, maybe as a super sub rather than destroying careers of the likes of McInnes and macrae by playing them as sub too often and never giving them a fair crack.
starting to worry about Pendles though.
But list decisions are for another thread.